Trickier Terms and Concepts Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

Overt vs. Covert?

A

Overt = aware

Covert = unaware

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Alternative hypothesis

A

Will predict the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Null hypothesis

A

States that the independent variable will not have the predicted effect on the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

One-tailed hypothesis (directional)

A

Specific effect predicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Two-tailed hypothesis (non-directional)

A

Effect predicted but not specified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Opportunity sampling

A

Same as convenience sampling, e.g. using students at a university.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Time-point sampling

A

Records data at fixed intervals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Time-event sampling

A

Fixed period of time set for an observation (different to event sampling)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Likert scale

A

Range of answers to rate between, e.g. strongly agree to strongly disagree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Semantic Differential Scale

A

Place between 2 descriptive words e.g. strong/weak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Nominal Level Data

A

When data is split into simple categories of behaviour and how often they occur.

Think ‘NOM’ as name, e.g. named data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ordinal Level Data

A

Individuals’s data, can then be ranked and ordered in terms of performance.

Think ranked in ORDer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Interval Level Data

A

Has equal intervals and shows difference between participants instead of just the order.

Think equal INTERVALs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Type 1 Error

A

When the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis rejected incorrectly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Type 2 Error

A

When the null hypothesis is accepted and the alternative hypothesis rejected incorrectly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Internal reliability

A

Consistencies of results of a test across items within the test.

17
Q

External reliability

A

Extent of variance of a test score from one time to another.

18
Q

Inter-rater reliability

A

Same results obtained from different observers.

19
Q

Split-half reliability

A

Tests internal reliability by testing the first half and then the second half and comparing results.

20
Q

Test-retest method for reliability

A

Tests external reliability by retesting the same study. Requires a high level of standardisation.

21
Q

Internal validity

A

How well researcher is measuring the effect of the IV on the DV.

22
Q

External validity

A

How generalisable a study can be considered.

23
Q

Face validity

A

How good a study looks to be at testing what is meant to be tested.

24
Q

Construct validity

A

Whether the study measures the behaviour it sets out to be measuring.

25
Concurrent validity
Whether a test gives the same results as another study claiming to measure the same behaviour.
26
Criterion validity
How much one measure predicts the validity of another measure.
27
Ethical Consideration Origins
British Psychological Society (BPS) produced the Code of Ethics and Conduct.
28
Abstract
Comes 2nd in a practical report. Summarises the study.
29
Appendices
Comes last (8th) in a practical report. Gives materials, raw data and other things a reader may need to understand the research.
30
Deduction
When you create a hypothesis and then conduct research to prove or disprove this.
31
Induction
The concept of having results or observing behaviour and then developing a hypothesis off this.