Triune God Midterm Flashcards
(54 cards)
Definition of divine incomprehensibility
The knowledge of God cannot be contained by the mind of the creature.
How does 1 Kings 8:27 establish the incomprehensibility of God?
God cannot be contained. The finite can’t contain the infite.
In what two senses do we say God is incomprehensible?
God cannot be grasped in his entirety.
Fundamental difference between creature and creation.
In reference to our understanding of God, what is the difference between ‘comprehending’ and ‘knowing’?
We can attain some knowledge but we can never fully comprehend God.
Fill in the missing word from this statement by Herman Bavinck: ‘If we cannot speak of God ________________, then we cannot speak of him at all.’
Analogically
If God is unknowable in himself, how and where does he make something of himself known to us?
Through his revelation
Who names God? Why?
God names himself, for our benefit. We are unable to comprehend him so we rely on Him to name Himself.
What means does God use in condescending to reveal himself to creatures?
language and imagery of creation.
What is Archetypal knowledge?
The knowledge that God has of himself, his self-consciousness.
What is Ectypal knowledge?
The human knowledge of God derviced from His revelation.
What are the three ways of expressing God’s attributes?
Way of negation or removal
Way of eminence
Way of causality
What is the meaning of the term ‘aseity’?
God is “of himself” or “from himself”.
What is the meaning of God’s independence?
God neither needs nor receives anything from outside himself for the full actuality of his existence, essence, and activity.
Does God’s aseity mean that he is self-caused? Why or why not?
No, by suggesting that God produces himself, it seems to require the possibility of God’s nonexistence as a kind of background to his being.
The meaning of God’s infinity
Means that God is wholly unbounded in his essence and existence.
What is the meaning of divine simplicity?
God is not composed of parts.
How does the doctrine of creation ex nihilo support the doctrine of divine simplicity?
Requires that God himself is purely actual, He would require a mover in order to exist and operate.
How do God’s independence and aseity support the doctrine of divine simplicity?
All that is God must be God. He cannot be the result of some principle.
If God was composed of parts then he would receive some actuality from another and would be dependent on both the parts and agent composing them.
According to those who hold to God’s simplicity, why can he not be composed of parts?
Without the whole part, it would be different.
How does divine simplicity support the truth that God is utterly reliable and dependable?
No possibility he will go to peices, He doesn’t depend for his perfection of essence on something other than himself.
What is the meaning of God’s immutability?
God cannot change
What are two biblical passages that support the doctrine of divine immutability? What do they say?
Malachi 3:6 - God says he doesn’t change
Romans 11:29 - the gifts and the callings of God are irrevocable.
How does the fact of God’s pure actuality support the belief that he is immutable?
God as the first cause of being: that which lacks passive potency has no capacity for change.
How would an adherent to divine immutability respond to the charge that immutability renders God uninvolved with the world and somewhat static and lifeless?
Perfect fullness of actuality and life that God cannot be moved.