Trusts 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Bridge of Ayr - restoring not rebuilding - wanted trust to fail but this was unsuccessful

A

Templeton v Burgh of Ayr

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Trustees can be office holders

A

Parish Council of Kilmarnock v Ossington’s Trs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Trustees can be appointed by name or reference - ‘same trustees as my brother’

A

Martin v Ferguson’s Trustees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can accept offie expressly or by implication from actions

Prolonged inaction not enough to constitute resignation, has to be done expressly

A

Ker v City of Glasgow Bank

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Professional trustee
Court will consider whether its in the best interest of the trust for trustee to step down and someone replace them

A

RBS Plc, Petitioner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sheriff held that so long as resignation is written and expressed to other trustees then there are various means by which it can be done

A

McKenna v Rafique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Malversation of office required for removal of trustee

A

Ciarocca v Ciarocca

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Trustee not replaced by heirs or executors when they die. Death divests trustee of title. Property automatically passes to other trustees.

A

Shenken v Pheonix Life Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Beneficiaries have personal rights to trust patrimony

A

Inland Revenue v Clark’s Trustees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Directions in private trust to put up statues of family members of testarix. Held to be contrary to public policy.
‘Waste of money’ - ‘Vanity’

A

McCraig’s Trs v Kirk of Session of United Free Kirk of Lismore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Wanted shops (that testator owned) to be knocked down in order to build bronze statute of him.
Contrary to public policy - would make the town ‘ridiculous’

A

Aitken’s Trs v Aitken

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

£50 each to all pets ‘Celia to have charge of them’
Held to mean the money would go to Celia for the benefit of their pets = reasonable

A

Flockhart’s Trs v Bourlet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Trustees own trust property but it is immune from their private creditors

A

Mackenzie v Watson and Stuart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

‘Trust’ not essential in declaration

A

Macpherson v Macpherson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Declaration must include:
- Beneficiaries
- Trust property
- Purpose

A

Clark Taylor and Co Ltd v Quality Site Development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Declaration of trust must be intimated to at least one beneficiary

A

Allan’s Trs v Lord Advocate

17
Q

Performance of act by trustee can only be at variance with terms of trust when it isn’t expressly prohibited

A

Marques of Lothian’s CB

18
Q

If trustees appoint agent and loss is incurred, trustees won’t incur liability due to the negligence or fraud of that agent.
(Will be if they fail to exercise due care and supervision of the agent)

A

Thomson v Campbell

19
Q

Must monitor agent’s work and replace them of they perform badly
Must not give too many discretionary powers to agent

A

Scott v Occidental Petrol (Caledonia) Ltd

20
Q

Power to advance capital ONLY where beneficiary has VESTED or CONTINGENT right in the capital AND advance is necessary for purposes of education and maintenance of beneficiary

A

Macfarlane v Macfarlane’s Trs

21
Q

Trustees with personal interest cannot take part in vote

A

Shanks v Aitken

22
Q

Lack of consultation re appointment of new trustees meant appointment invalid

A

Wyse v Abbott

23
Q

Consultation unnecessary where trustee uncontactable

A

Malcolm v Goldie

24
Q

Duty of care: same degree of diligence that an ordinary man would exercise over his own affairs

A

Raes v Meek

25
Q

Duty of care an objective test
Immunity clause will be interpreted narrowly and restrictively

A

Knox v Mackinnon

26
Q

Duty to keep trust accounts implied in every trust but can be expressly excluded or by implication

A

Leitch v Leitch

27
Q

Breach of trust because hadn’t considered whether investment was in interest of the trust - reasonable person wouldn’t just leave their investment and let it sit

A

Melville v Nobles Trs

28
Q

No ultra vires breach where trustees took all possible steps to establish the facts

A

Lamond Trs v Croom

29
Q

No ultra vires breach where trustees obtained legal advice as to the extent of their powers

A

Warren’s JF v Warren’s Ex

30
Q

Transaction in breach of fiduciary duty can be reducible by beneficiaries

A

Johnson v Macfarlane

31
Q

If trustee profits from breach of fiduciary duty they must pay profit into trust patrimony regardless of whether patrimony has suffered a loss

A

Cherry’s Trs v Patrick

32
Q

Co-trustees have duty to take steps if funds are misappropriated by another trustee

A

Millar’s Trs v Polson

33
Q

Clause absolving trustees from liability for retained investments held ineffective

A

Clarke v Clarke’s Trs

34
Q

Professional trustee loaned money to someone who said they’d pay back double the next day - never paid this back = worthless security

A

Lutea Trs v Orbis Trs Guernsey

35
Q

Intra vires contracts = trust patrimony only is liable

A

Cuningham v Montgomerie

36
Q

Trustee may be personally liable if they don’t make it clear to 3rd party that they’re acting as trustee

A

Brown v Sutherland

37
Q

Constructive trust made for benefit of beneficiaries to protect property from creditors due to misconduct

A

Mortgage Corporation v Mitchells Robertson

38
Q

Beneficiaries can insist on seeing trust accounts

A

Tod v Tod’s Trs
Nouvillan v Nouvillan’s Trs

39
Q

Where one has a duty of care they shouldn’t put this duty in competition with their own interests

A

Huntington Copper & Sulphur co V Henderson