U3 AOS 2: Resolving a civil dispute Flashcards Preview

VCE Legal Studies > U3 AOS 2: Resolving a civil dispute > Flashcards

Flashcards in U3 AOS 2: Resolving a civil dispute Deck (34)
Loading flashcards...
1

Factors to consider when initiating a Civil claim

- Costs
- Negotiation options
- Limitation of actions
- Scope of liability
- Enforcement issues

2

Negotiation

Plaintiff should consider whether they can try and negotiate a resolution of the dispute without initiating a claim

3

Costs

A party involved in a civil spite may incur costs in resolving a civil dispute. The costs include fees for legal representation, court costs and other disbursements (ie fees paid to export witnesses) as well as possible costs to be paid to other party if plaintiff is not successful

Costs depend on
- Complexity of the case
- Court matter will be held in
- Nature of the case
- Length of legal proceedings

4

Limitation of actions

Plaintiffs have to bring their cases to court within a time limit. Referring to the restriction on time within a civil action can be commenced. The plaintiff will need to commence the proceeding in a certain amount of time / years, once the period has passes the defendant maybe be able to raise a defence that the plaintiff is out of time.

Why?
- Evidence does not last and people can't remember
- Disputes can be resolved ASAP = promoting social cohesion

PHYSICAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE = NO TIME LIMIT

5

Scope of liability

Before initiating the plaintiff needs to consider
- Who are the possible defendants
- What extent defendant may be liable.

6

Enforcement issues

.

7

Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV)

AKA Complaints body, offer dispute resolution services to people who make a complaint on another party. Business unity go VIC governments, department of justice and regulation.

8

Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)

Tribunal - Dispute resolution body. Deal with limited area of the law. Process of dispute resolution is less formal than the courts, intended to be cheaper and more efficient way of resolving disputes. Aiming to improve accessibility using phones, video ect. while reducing waiting time

Decisions are binding.

9

Civil pre-trial procedures

The plaintiff decides to issue a proceeding in County / Supreme Court, party must complete various pre trial procedure before ready for trial, most are mandatory however judge may order certain steps.

10

Responsibilities of key personal

.

11

Judicial powers of case management

- Judges and Magistrates have power to manage civil disputes
- Powers come from statute and rules of court
- To achieve the just, efficient, timely and cost - efficient resolution of the real issues in disputes. Judges can exercise their powers to manage cases.

12

Mediation

A meeting between 2 parties resolving a dispute with the 3rd party of a mediator who's role is to facilitate discussion between the parties. However the resolution must be made by the parties voluntarily

13

Conciliation

A meeting between 2 parties resolving a dispute with the 3rd party of a conciliator who's role is to facilitate discussion between the parties as weak as suggest solutions However the resolution must be made by the parties voluntarily with the conciliators advice

14

Arbitration

A meeting between 2 parties resolving a dispute with the 3rd party of an arbitrator who's role is to listen to evidence and arguments of the parties and make a decision. The resolution is decided by the arbitrator and is legally binding.

Used in Magistrates court when claims are less than $10000 and commercial disputes

15

Purposes of remedies

To restore the party who has suffered loss / injury to the original position they were in before the act / omission (wrongdoing) took place. Usually done in the form of compensation. An injured party can claim compensation for pain / suffering due to a civil wrong

16

Possible options of negotiation

- Parties interact directly w/ each other to try and resolve the dispute with or w/o legal rep
- A mediation with or w/o legal rep arranged themselves
- Arranging a negotiation or other dispute resolution method through a body such as the Dispute Settlement Centre of Victoria

17

When negotiation is not an option

- One of the parties do not want to resolve the issue
- There is a power imbalance between parties
- When the negotiation is unlikely to be successful

18

Before initiating a claim the plaintiff should consider

If the plaintiff imitates a claim in court and is unsuccessful they not only will have to pay their own legal costs, but also may be ordered to pay for some of the defendants costs.

19

CAV Jurisdiction

CAV is limited to assisting in settlement of disputes within jurisdiction in which they obtain power through vic statures.

CAV can assist with:
- Supply of goods and services
- Residential tenancies
- Retirement villages
- Owners corporations

20

Purposes of CAV

Only accept complaints from plaintiffs from consumers and tenants not businesses / landlords
1) Advises VIC gov on consumer legislation (eg laws on sale and purchase of goods)
2) Provides info to educate people on consumer laws and enforces compliance with consumer laws
3) Provides consumer + traders, landlords + tenants with a dispute resolution process
4) CAV help settle disputes effectively and constructively without cost and assistance in agreeing on resolution without imposing a decision.

21

Purposes of VCAT

To provide Victorias w/ low-cost, accessible, efficient and independent tribunal delivering high-quality dispute resolution processes. Provides parties with alternative to resolve certain types of civil disputes through its various lists.

22

Appropriateness of CAV

1) Whether dispute is written within CAV jurisdiction
2) Whether dispute is likely to settle
3) Whether there are other / better ways to resolve dispute ( if available )
4) Will not conciliate dispute that courts / VCAT have already made a decision or where cases are pending

23

Compulsory conferences

Confidential meetings in which parties discuss way to resolve w/ VCAT member, lead by VCAT member and may suggest forms of settlement and likely outcomes of hearings

24

Final hearings

If the matter is not solved in mediation / compulsory conference it will be listed for a final hearing by a VCAT member. Parties will have a chance to present their case including, hearing evidence and asking questions of witnesses and provide documents to support case.

VCAT may make a binding decision
VCAT has obligation to make proceedings with little formality and technicality as possible

25

Appropriateness of VCAT

- Whether disputes are in VCAT jurisdiction

26

VCAT Jurisdiction

- Purchase: goods / services
- Tenants / landlords
- Sexual harassment
- Discrimination
- Domestic building works

27

Advantages VS Disadvantages CAV

Advantage
- Conciliation service is free & informal process

Disadvantage
- Jurisdiction is limited & no power to compel parties to undergo conciliation

28

Pleadings

Pleadings: Series of documents filled and exchanged between parties to a court proceeding. Set out and clarify the claims and defences of parties and help define issues in dispute.

Statement of claim: Filed by plaintiff setting out detail of claims made against the defence and remedy sought.

Defence: Filled by defendant = response to the claims.

Avoids surprised and sets out clear details

29

Discovery

Enables parties to get copies of the documents that are relevant to dispute issue / listed in a formal document. Assisting in reaching out-of-court settlement. Requires all relevant documents disclosed. Dependant of the likelihood of success and strength of other sides case.

30

Expert evidence

Experts can be called by parties in a civil claim to give opinion on issue of the case (medical, finance) often given via a written document by an independent expert

Purposes:
Determine strength: Allows each party to determine the strength of other sides case and determination likely hood go success
Understand damages asked for: Allows defendant to understand amount of damages that plaintiff is seeking to enable the defendant to consider whether it may be better to settle out of court
Reduced element of surprise: Reduce surprise at trial and avoid a 'trial by ambush' particularly where evidence is disclosed in writing before trial.