U3AOS2B Flashcards
Civil Law (45 cards)
What are the needs for legal practitioners?
A legal practitioner is an expert who has undergone training to practice the law and presents a case on behalf of a party. They will have knowledge in certain areas of law and will prepare and conduct a case to try and achieve success.
Why do we need legal practitioners?
Legal practitioners have experience in: following court processes, collecting evidence, presenting cases and maintaining proper decorum in court.
If someone was to represent themselves they may struggle with:
- Presenting their case
- Understanding legal jargon
- Cross-examining witnesses
- Remaining fully objective
What are the strengths to obtaining a legal practitioner?
- are experts who will be able to help the parties navigate the civil justice system
- have objectivity in being able to make decisions in the civil case, such as whether to agree with the other party to negotiate a settlement
- can help avoid delays that may arise with self-represented parties
What are the weaknesses to obtaining a legal practitioner?
- not all legal practitioners are equal or have the same level of experience and skills. Some legal practitioners are more experienced than others, which may **impact on the quality **of the legal services
- not everyone is able to afford legal representation, so some people may be left to represent themselves. However, often self-represented parties do not have the necessary skills, experience or objectivity to be able to make the right choice
- even if a self-represented party can afford a lawyer, this could potentially be a great expense to them or their family, particularly if they lose, and are ordered to pay the other party’s legal costs too
What are class actions?
(or group proceedings) are considered a group dispute in which multiple people may join together to commence a civil action.
What must a class action have?
- Seven or more people
- Claims relating to the same, or similar, circumstances
- The same issues needing to be decided
What are the costs for class actions?
- the lead plaintiff alone is responsible for the costs (including any adverse costs orders) if the class action fails
- most firms work on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis and so the plaintiffs will not need to pay
- litigation funder have become common with class actions, and they will often pay the cost of a failed class action
- if the class action is successful, then the group members will share the damages awarded with the litigation funder or firm involved
What is the appropriateness for class actions?
- Are there seven or more people with a claim against the same defendant?
- Are the claims about the same or similar breaches of rights?
- Is there a law firm or litigation funder willing to pay for the claim?
- Is there a person willing to be the lead plaintiff?
- What is the size and nature of the claims?
- Has one group member suffered significantly more than others?
What are the strengths of class actions?
- it is a more efficient way of dealing with a number of claims because the court does not have to deal with multiple claims about the same issue, thus saving court time and resources
- group members are not responsible for the payment of any costs (though they will share the costs if the claim is successful). This therefore increases access to justice for group members who may not otherwise be able to afford the costs of initiating a claim themselves
- it is a more convenient way for group members who wish to pursue a claim but do not want the burden and inconvenience of having to actively participate in proceedings
What are the weaknesses of class actions?
- class actions impose a large cost burden on the lead plaintiff if the class action fails and there is no litigation funder or no ‘no win no fee’ agreement with the plaintiff law firm
- even though it avoid multiple claims, the size of the class action is normally such that it takes up a significant amount of court resources and time. The approval process for a settlement can also be significant
- litigation funders have been criticised for taking a large percentage of the total amount awarded to the group members, which then substantially reduces the amount paid to group members and does not reflect their actual loss
What is Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV)?
Is a complaints body that provides information about consumer law and free dispute resolution services.
What are the roles of CAV?
- Advises the Victorian Government on consumer legislation
- Provide information and guidance to educate people about consumer laws
- Enforces compliance with consumer laws
- In rare cases, they can provide a dispute resolution process for consumers and traders (and landlords and tenants)
What are the purposes of CAV?
- To help people come to an agreement about how to resolve their disputes efficiently without any cost. This means that the resolution will not be at their expense, or take too long to resolve.
- To try and help the parties reach a resolution that is consistent with the law. In helping the parties, CAV has a compliance focus to ensure that any person who has not followed the law is aware of their breach and does not do it again.
What is the jurisdiction of CAV?
- disputes about a product that is faulty damaged, not fit for purpose or cannot be repaired
- disputes about a service that is not completed with care and skill, took too long, caused damage or it not fit for purpose
- disputes about buying cars, such as in relation to warranties, the price charged or the condition of the car
- disputes about rental agreements, rent, signing or ending a lease, or rental applications
- disputes about repairs
What is the appropriateness of CAV?
- Is the dispute within CAV’s jurisdiction?
- Has the consumer or tenant tried to resolve the matter themselves?
- Does the complaint need CAV’s involvement?
- Has there been a breach of legislation?
- Is the consumer vulnerable or disadvantaged?
- Has the issue already been dealt with by CAV or VCAT?
- Is the issue likely to be resolved?
- Are there other or better ways to resolve the dispute?
What are the strengths of CAV?
- CAV’s conciliation service is free, meaning that it is accessible to all Victorians, regardless of their ability to pay
- the conciliation process is informal, and can be conducted over the telephone, which removes many anxieties people have with the formalities of a courtroom
- CAV ensures procedural fairness by allowing both sides the opportunity to present their side of the story and challenge the other side’s case as part of the conciliation process
What is the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT)
Is a tribunal that provides a cheaper and less formal dispute resolution for courts.
What are the purposes of VCAT?
- To provide low cost dispute resolution to the parties
- To make achieving a resolution as accessible as possible
- To make the dispute resolution process more efficient
- To ensure their members are independent and unbiased
How does VCAT achieve their purposes?
Low cost:
- no hearing fees for many claims such as cases $100,000 or less are heard in less than a day
- parties only need to pay a small amount in filing their claim
- in many lists, parties do not have to go through pre-trial procedures
- parties can represent themselves
Accessible:
- conducts hearings in various locations
- allows people to make applications online and conducts hearings online or via phone
- less formal than court proceedings
Efficient:
- aims to reduce waiting times
- generally does not use pre-trial procedures or formal procedures
Independent:
- VCAT’s members are independent and will act unbiased
What is the jurisidiction for VCAT?
unpaid rent, repairs, maintainence, damages or changes to property, excessive rent increases, costs disputes between lawyers and clients, disputes about a decision made by a government agency, products and services bought or sold, quality of domestic or commercial building works, loss or damage of water flowing onto property, discrimination complaints, review about a decision by council to grant or not grant a permit, disputes about the valuation of a land for the purposes of paying rates and taxes
What are some cases VCAT cannot hear?
- Class actions
- Disputes between employers and employees
- Disputes between neighbours
- Disputes between drivers in car accidents
- Disputes involving federal or state law where VCAT has not been given power to hear the matter
- Disputes where the parties are residents of different Australian states, or if the Commonwealth is one of the parties
What are the dispute resolution methods that VCAT uses?
1. Mediation
Is a cooperative method of resolving disputes. It is a process in which the parties discuss the issues involved, develop options, consider alternatives and reach an agreement through negotiation.
2. Compulsory conferences
Are confidential meetings during which the parties discuss ways to resolve their dispute in the presence of a VCAT member. VCAT members who assist in the compulsory conference generally will not hear the case at the final hearing.
3. Final hearing
If the matter has not been settled at mediation, at compulsory conference or in any other way, it will be listed for a final hearing before a VCAT member. A VCAT member will oversee the hearing and make a binding decision on the parties.
What is the appropriateness for VCAT?
- Is the dispute within VCAT’s jurisdiction?
- Can the dispute be resolved through negotiation or mediation?
- Is the applicant able to pay the fees for that list?
- Do the parties want more avenues of appeal?
- Will the parties take VCAT seriously? Or is the court needed?
- Is the size and complexity suitable for VCAT?
- Do the parties want a formal way of resolving the dispute?
What are the strengths to VCAT?
- is normally cheaper than courts due to low application fees, usually lower or no hearing fees, the costs saved by not having to undertake expensive pre-trial procedures and parties being able to represent themselves
- generally offers a speedy resolution of disputes - the average time from application to resolution of disputes in its busiest list has been as low as 2-3 weeks
- an informal atmosphere ensures that parties can put their case forward in their own way, which can make people feel more comfortable with the process