{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "name": "Brainscape", "url": "https://www.brainscape.com/", "logo": "https://www.brainscape.com/pks/images/cms/public-views/shared/Brainscape-logo-c4e172b280b4616f7fda.svg", "sameAs": [ "https://www.facebook.com/Brainscape", "https://x.com/brainscape", "https://www.linkedin.com/company/brainscape", "https://www.instagram.com/brainscape/", "https://www.tiktok.com/@brainscapeu", "https://www.pinterest.com/brainscape/", "https://www.youtube.com/@BrainscapeNY" ], "contactPoint": { "@type": "ContactPoint", "telephone": "(929) 334-4005", "contactType": "customer service", "availableLanguage": ["English"] }, "founder": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Andrew Cohen" }, "description": "Brainscape’s spaced repetition system is proven to DOUBLE learning results! Find, make, and study flashcards online or in our mobile app. Serious learners only.", "address": { "@type": "PostalAddress", "streetAddress": "159 W 25th St, Ste 517", "addressLocality": "New York", "addressRegion": "NY", "postalCode": "10001", "addressCountry": "USA" } }

Underlying Law Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Constitutional Standing Provisions

A

Cases and Controversies Clause, Art. III, § 2, cl. 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Constitutional Standing Cases

A

Lujan, Massachusetts v. EPA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

APA Standing Provision

A

§ 702 (Zone of Interest).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Non-Delegation Principle Provision

A

Vesting Clause, Art. I § 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intelligible Principle Provision

A

Separation of Powers, Vesting Clause, Art. I § 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intelligible Principle Cases

A

Hampton, Schechter, Witman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Major Question Provisions

A

Separation of Powers, Accountability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Major Question Cases

A

West Virginia v. EPA, Tobacco, [OSHA (Subject Matter)]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(INVALID) Legislative Veto Provisions

A

Violates the Presentment Clause, Art. I §7, cl. 2 & 3. Violates bicameralism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(INVALID) Legislative Veto Cases

A

Chadha

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Appropriations Provisions

A

Formalistic Requirement of Vesting Claus, Art. I § 1. & Spending Power art. I, § 8, cl. 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Appropriations Cases

A

Robertson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(INVALID) Line Item Veto Provisions

A

Unconstitutional legislating, violates the vesting clause, Art. I § 1. etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(INVALID) Line Item Veto Case

A

Clinton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Presidential Powers Provisions

A

Art. II, § 1, cl. 1 (unitary executive); § 2, cl. 1 (commander in chief); § 3 (faithfully execute).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Presidential Powers Cases

A

Youngstown Steel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Executive Orders Provisions

A

Faithfully execute, Art. II, § 3.

18
Q

Executive Orders Cases

A

Trump, DAPA, Tabacco.

19
Q

Appointments Provisions

A

Art. II, § 2, cl. 2.

Ineligibility and Incompatibility Clause: Art. I, § 6, cl. 2.

20
Q

Appointments Cases

A

Buckley, N.L.R.B. Canning.

21
Q

Removals Provisions

A

Art. II, § 2, cl. 2.

22
Q

Removals Cases

A

Myers, Humphrey’s Executor, Morrison, Saila Law, Free Enterprise.

23
Q

APA Definitions and Scope

24
Q

APA Cause of Action Provision

A

§ 702 (“Any person suffering a legal wrong…”).

25
APA Cause of Action EXCEPTIONS Provisions
§ 701 (enabling act & action is in agency discretion).
26
APA Application/Review Provisions
§ 706.
27
APA Application/Review Cases
New Rule: Overton Park. 
 Rescission: State Farm, DHS. 
 Change: DoC (Pretext), Fox. 
Inaction: Massachusetts v. EPA.
28
Fact/Policy Review—De Novo Provision
§ 706(2)(F).
29
Fact/Policy Review—Arbitrary & Capricious Provision
§ 706(2)(A).
30
Fact/Policy Review—Arbitrary & Capricious Cases
- New Rule: Overton Park. 
 - Rescission: State Farm, DHS. - 
Change: DoC (Pretext), Fox. - Inaction: Massachusetts v. EPA.
31
Fact/Policy Review—Substantial Evidence Provision
§ 706(2)(E).
32
Fact/Policy Review—Substantial Evidence Case
Universal Camera.
33
Interpretation of Statute—Deference Provision
§ 706 (“the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions…”).
34
Interpretation of Statute—Deference Cases
- Who Interprets?: Hearst Publication, Skidmore, Chevorn. 
 - Step One: MCI Telecommunications, Babbitt, (National Cable & Telecom). - Extraordinary Cases: Tabacco, Massachusetts v. EPA. 
 - Step Two: Utility Air, (National Cable & Telecom). - Step “Zero”: Mead Corp., City of Arlington.
35
Interpretation of Regulation—Deference Provision
§ 706 (“the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions…”).
36
Interpretation of Regulation—Deference Cases
Auer, Kisor.
37
Informal Procedure Provisions
§ 553: 
 (b) Notice; 
 (c) Comment; 
(c) Concise General Statement.
38
Informal Procedure Cases
- Formal vs. Informal: Allegheny-Lundlum Steel, Florida East Coast Ry.
 - Notice: Chocolate Manufacturers, Long Island Care. 
 - Concise General Statement: Nova Scotia Food. 
 - Comment: HBO, Sierra Club, Volpe, Association of National Advertisers.
39
Judicially Create Procedure Cases
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Vermont Yankee.
40
Informal Procedure Exceptions Provisions
§ 553: 
 (a)(1) military or foreign affairs; 
 (a)(2) agency management; 
…
 (b)(3)(A) interpretative rules; (b)(3(B) for good cause.
41
Informal Procedure Exceptions Cases
- Interpretative Rules: National Family Planning; Hoctor; Texas v. United States. 
 - Agency Management: Lincoln.