Unit 1 Flashcards
(77 cards)
Preamble is a part of the Constitution
Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala
Harmonious Construction
Minerva Mills
Judicial Review (case and article)
Marbury v Madison, 13 (2)
Basic structure doctrine mentioned for the first time
Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan
Doctrine of severability
Princicples were laid down in
RMDC v Union of India
Whether or not something is a basic structure will be determined when put to question to the court
Minerva mills and Indra Gandhi v Raj Narain
Rule of Law is a basic structure and cannot be amended
Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala
FR and DPSP to be considered harmoniously and cannot override each other
IR Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu
It is difficult to restrict the sovereign legislative power by judicial interference except so far as the express provision of a written constitution (judicial review)
AK Gopalan v State of Madras
FR comes above DPSP
state of Madras v Champakam
Harmonious Construction introduced in?
Quarashi Mohd. v State of Bihar
(also Kerala Education bill)
The Right to live human dignity, free from exploitation enshrined under Article 21 derives its life and breath from the Directive Principles of State Policy and particularly clauses (e) and (f) of Article 39 and Article 41 and 42
Bandhu Mukti Morcha case
Right to education is an FR well within in the meaning of article 21
Unnikrishnan v state of Andhra Pradesh
Determine what is part of the state and not
RD Shetty v international airport authority
Articles 19 and 21 were not mutually exclusive and had to be read in consonance, a link between 14, 19 and 21 was established
Maneka Gandhi v Union of India
Right to Sleep
Ramlila Maidan Incident
Right to Privacy
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Sabarimala Judgment
Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors. v. The State of Kerala & Ors.
DNA, fingerprint and handwriting can be accepted and is not violative of article 20(3)
MP Chandra v Satish Chandra
Brain fingerprinting analysis, polygraph test, etc. and other scientific methods are not accepted and is violative of article 20(3)
Selvi v State of Karnataka
Caste cannot be the sole determining factor for reservations
MR Balaji v State of Mysore
Introduction of reservation
state of Madras v Champakam
OBC reservation is constitutional
Ashok Kumar Thakur v Union of India
Freedom of Religion which articles
25-28