Unit 1 Flashcards

(43 cards)

1
Q

Possession vs Ownership

A

Typically the one who has possession over property is the rightful owner. Possession doesn’t need to be continued - once you possess, you don’t have to always occupy land - you can leave.

Ownership derived from ownership .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Attributes of Ownership

A

Bundle of Sticks:
- Right to exclude
- Right to transfer
- Right to possess (difference in real vs personal property)
- Right to use
- Right to destroy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Property Theories & Justifications

A
  • First Occupancy
  • Labor Theory
  • Utilitarianism
  • Liberty/Civic Republican Theory
  • Personhood Theory
    -The Capture Rule
  • Finders of Personal Property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

First Occupancy

A

Discovery: must “call dibs” (make intention to possess known) & must actually control (obtain possession - control). Used in actual “unowned land” contexts

Doctrine of Conquest: how the rights of one sovereign nation can be taken over by another sovereign nation
If you conquer entire land, all people stay there & own their land but nation changes

People get property rights in real property from the sovereign. Root of title (sovereign) -> first owner -> second owner -> third owner -> current owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Locke’s Labor Theory

A
  • Human effort & labor is what transforms natural resources into property.
  • Because everyone inherently has a property interest in his own person, everybody has a basis to claim the products of his labor as his property as well
  • By adding your labor to something a common resource, that improved resource becomes your property
    -Caveat: Locke suggests that this principle is justified only when “there is enough, & as good left in common for others”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Utilitarianism

A
  • Indv’s desire to self-maximize will increase landowners wealth & aggregate wealth
  • Assumes that humans are natural maximizers, & exist to create value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Civic Republican Theory

A
  • Private property facilities democracy
  • Independence of property & land means less reliant on the State
  • Landowners hold the majority of power in this society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Personhood Theory

A
  • People become emotionally connected to tangible things
  • Those tangible items then become part of their identity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Capture Rule

A
  • The first person to take possession of a thing owns it; prior in time wins
  • The capture rule only applies to wild animals, not domesticated animals
  • If you trespass onto someone’s land to capture a wild animal you usually can’t keep it
  • Pierson v Post
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Finders of Personal Property

A

Ganter v. Kapiloff
Rule of law: Finders not Keepers. The finder has a superior possessory right over all except for the true owner. Once the true owner (TO) is identified, the finders possessory interest ceases

Benjamin v. Lindner Aviation
Rule of law: mislaid property is awarded to the Locus Owner.

3 types of found property
1. Lost: TO unintentionally parted with it, & is not aware of its location
2. Mislaid: TO intentionally placed it somewhere, but forgot where they placed it
3. Abandoned: the TO no longer intends to reclaim the property

Lost & abandoned property go to the finder; mislaid property goes to the locus owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Categories of Property

A

Personal property: movable property, including belongings exclusive of land & buildings
- Tangible: things other than land that are of value solely for what they are, & don’t create a financial claim against someone else
- Intangible: things not of intrinsic value in & of themselves, but which are valuable for what they can purchase or which create financial claim (stocks, bind, bank accounts, money, etc.)

Real property: land & things affixed to land, such as buildings; may sometimes include rights to water, minerals, & airspace rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Surface Water vs Groundwater

A

Surface water: encompasses all waters found on the earth’s surface

Groundwater: water which occurs or moves, seeps, filters, or percolates through the ground under the surface of the land

Hydrologically, all kind of same thing/connected. Our law doesn’t recognize that though - 2 separate systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Approaches to Regulating Surface Water

A

Riparian system: owners of land adjacent to river are entitled to reasonable use

Prior appropriation: first person to beneficially use water gets it, whether adjacent or not (first claim + beneficial use)

Statutory appropriation system: can use the water in the way the permit specifies - regulated

Doctrine of accession: a person is given the right to use the stream by just owning the property next to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Regulating Surface Water Drainage

A

Common Enemy Rule: allows landowners to take any measures to remove or divert surface water, without liability for any damage caused to neighboring properties

Civil Law Rule: requires lower landowners to accept the natural flow of surface water from higher land but prohibits upper landowners from altering drainage in a way that harms other

Reasonable Use Rule: permits landowners to alter surface water drainage as long as the chances are reasonable & don’t cause unnecessary harm to neighboring properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Surface Water Rights

A

Prior Appropriation Rule: first in time to validly appropriate = senior right to the water (over later appropriators of surface water). No requirement to share or use reasonably. The use must be beneficial

Absolute Ownership/Capture: focused on possession. The minute you pull water up, it’s yours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Groundwater Rights

A

Ad coelum + reasonable use: a landowner can extract water beneath their property but only for beneficial use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Rights to Groundwater Extraction

A

Absolute Dominion Rule (“English Rule”): focus is possession. Landowners have an unlimited right to extract groundwater from their property.

Reasonable Use Rule (“American Rule”): focus is productivity. Landowners can use groundwater for beneficial purposes, but their use cannot unreasonably interfere with the rights of other landowners.

Correlative Rights Doctrine: focus is proportionality. Landowners overlying the same aquifer have a right to a reasonable share of the groundwater supply, with priority given to on-tract use.

Rest: focus is equity & fairness. Uses factor balancing test to determine reasonableness

Prior Appropriation:
The first in time, first in right principle, where those who first legally used groundwater have priority rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Property Tort: Conversion

A

A tort claim for interference with another’s ownership or right to possession of personal property, treating it as if it were D’s own.

Damages are awarded for the full value of the property

What’s needed for a conversion claim: (1) intent to have control & (2) over property of another

Remedies: (1) replevin (give me back my thing) & (2) trover (give me economic value of the thing)

19
Q

Property Tort: Trespass

A

A tort involving the unauthorized entry or interference with another’s land or property

Can apply to real property (land) or personal property (chattel)

Jacque v. Steenberg Homes: principle is we don’t want people crossing their land & people should respect that

What’s needed for a trespass claim: (1) knowingly & intentionally go into their property (2) without the landowner’s consent

Don’t need to show actual damage. Doesn’t matter whether or not it creates harm because people will feel loss of autonomy

Competing values: right of access. Legal excuses for trespass: necessity (don’t want property rights to be elevated over human life) & custom

State v. Shack: there’s a limitation on an owner’s right to exclude due to public policy. Cannot harm the rights of others through this exclusion

Balancing test: right to exclude vs right tto access

20
Q

Property Tort: Nuisance

A

A person has the freedom to use their property but not in a way to injure someone else

Never have to be on their property (being on would be trespass) but that you create an unreasonable aspect

Liability requires harm

Types: private & public

Nuisance per se: an activity that creates (public) nuisance no matter where it’s located

Nusiance per accidens: a problem of incompatible proximate uses; only nusiance due to location. If both can’t survive, to decide which stays is efficiency calculator

Crosstex North Texas: liability for nuisance requires conduct that substantially interferes with others’ use & enjoyment of property & causes unreasonable discomfort & annoyance

Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co: permanent damages, rather than an injunction, are appropriate if the damages resulting from a nuisance are significantly less than the economic benefit derived from the party causing the harm

Spur Industries Inc: if the public develops land in the vicinity of a public nuisance, the action creating the nuisance must be ceased by the party responsible for its creation, but said party is entitled to compensation

Defenses: P consented or acquiesced; coming to the nusiance (they were there first & you moved next to them knwoing about the nuisance); right-to-farm statutes

Remedies: injunction (typically based on balance of equities) or damages

21
Q

Private Nusiance

A

Affects right of indv owner of land or tenant

22
Q

Public Nusiance

A

Affects public in general & normally addressed by public ordinanc

23
Q

Conquest & Capture

A

The first person to take possession of a thing owns it; prior in time wins (Pierson v. Post & Ghen v. Rich)

Popov v. Hayashi: if a person completes a significant portion of the steps to achieve possession of an time but is thwarted due to the unlawful conduct of another, that person is entitled to a pre-possessory interest of the item

24
Q

Gov’t Power to Regulate & to Take

A

Access & Public Accommodations

Eminent Domain

Nuisance & Zoning

25
Access & Public Accommodations
Uou as the owner, if you open your property to the public, you can govern the property/have right to govern, but no longer have the right to exclude Access can only be restricted by an announced, equally applicable, reasonable rule
26
Eminent Domain
The Takings Clause: nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation 4 Elements: - 1. Private Property: needs to be property involved (typically land) - 2. Taking: gov’t compels the takings of the property (takings clause of 5th amendment) - 3. Just compensation: must pay when gov’t takes, generally is fair market value (FMV) - Public use: must be for the benefit of the public. Typically private a state, but not always (see Kilo)
27
Public Use in Eminent Domain
Narrow view: property will be used by the public Broad view: property will somewhat benefit the public Kelo: Economic benefits are a permissible form of public use that justifies the gov’t in seizing property from private citizens Going from public use (for the public to use) to public purpose requirement (if you can find a justifiable use that you say will benefit the public will allow you to take property) 5 Levels of "Public Use" 1. Taken for public ownership for public or gov’t use 2. Taken for private ownership for public use (Thomas would draw the line here) 3. Taken for private ownership to eliminate a public harm (This is where O’Conner would draw the line) 4. Taken for private ownership to create a public benefit (Where Kelo majority & federal line drawing is) 5. Taken for private ownership for private-only benefit
28
Nuisance & Zoning
Authority is police power. Zoning is regulatory law Cumulative zoning: those at the top in the zoning hierarchy could fit into bottom zoning but bottom zoning couldn’t fit in the top Economic Problems of Shared Resources: tragedy of the commons (overuse of a shared resource) & freeriders/public good (insufficient maintenance of a shared resource) Rational Basis Test: to be valid, the zoning must be rationally related to a legitimate state interest
29
Police Power vs Eminent Domain
Police power - Sovereign’s inherent power to regulate property & behavior in the jurisdiction - Employed to achieve public purposes: health, welfare, safety, morals, etc. - Everyone is burned & everyone is benefited - No one is paid to compensate for losses caused by the regulation - Zoning is always police power Eminent domain - Sovereign's inherent power to take title to property [by paying “just compensation”] - Employed to achieve public purposes and/or to obtain property for public use - Burden is only on the owner whose property is taken. The public benefits - The owner whose property is taken is paid (taxpayer money) to compensate for their loss
30
Abandonment
Intent to relinquish ownership + loss of possession Unlike personal property, no real way to abandon ownership in real property/land unless someone is willing to take it
31
Adverse Possession
1. Actual 2. Open & notorious 3. Hostile 4. Continuous 5. Exclusive & longer than the statutory period
32
Adverse Possession: Actual
Acts of occupation like that of a true owner) Have to physically go on the land
33
Adverse Possession: Open & Notorious
Sufficient to put true owner on notice Something that’s good enough use that will put true owner on notice but doesn’t have to subjectively inform them (if they were paying attention they would've realized they were using the land) Reasonable person standard - reasonable use of land Would a reasonable person dropping by property be on notice that you’re in possession/making this ownership type of claim
34
Adverse Possession: Hostile
Possession without permission of true owner Going to presume hostility unless owner can show permission All jurisdictions agree: possession with permission does not qualify as “hostile” One way to defeat adverse possession is to give someone permission to be there At minimum have to show the possessor objectively acted as the owner (not just a guest, etc.) of the property Hostility Approaches: 1. Objective Standard (Majority Rule): the possessor's use of the land is inconsistent with the rights of the true owner, regardless of intent 2. Subjective Intent Approach: this is divided into two main categories: a. Good Faith (Mistaken Belief) Standard Definition: the possessor must genuinely believe they own the land (good faith belief in ownership) b. Bad Faith (Intentional Trespasser) Standard Definition: the possessor must know they do not own the land but intend to claim it anyway 3. Permission as a Defense If the true owner grants permission, the possession is not hostile and adverse possession fails
35
Adverse Possession: Continuous
Pattern of occupation like that of a true owner Don’t need to be there all the time, use it in way someone with that property would use it When someone starts trespass (coming onto land without permission) they start the adverse possession clock Statute of limitations: how long you have to commence action in court Continuity means no break in possession with claim of right
36
Adverse Possession: Exclusive
Possession exclusive of true owner & strangers Exclusive one claiming dominion in a way that am owner would
37
Adverse Possession: Color of Title
When a grantee believes (in good faith) they have actual title, but the conveyance was defective in some way Legally significant for 3 reasons: 1. Possession under color of title is deemed to be hostile & under claim of rights 2. In some states, holding under color of title reduces the statutory period (not MO) 3. Color of title cna support a claim of constructive adverse possession Can help define the area of adverse possession But can’t only have deed - need to meet elements of adverse possession
38
Adverse Possession: In Good Faith
Jurisdiction dependent Majority view is objective: intent doesn’t matter as long as possession is hostile & not in line with true owner wants Minority view: must be good faith
39
How to Acquire Title
Affirmative action: the adverse possessor can institute a "quiet title action." It's the way you formalize your ownership after an adverse possession claim. Can either formalize as true owner defeating adverse claim or adverse possessor & want something on record that you own it (prove all elements). Formal announcement you own title. You are deemed to start ownership if you win claim when you first occupy the land Defense: ejectment action. The true owner may bring an ejectment action, & the adverse possessor may respond with adverse possession as an affirmative defense
40
Adverse Possession: Statutory Period & Notice
Typically, the time period starts on the day the adverse possessor began, but the date of discovery is also a possibility Marengo Cave Co. v. Ross (“the cave case”): possession of land is open & notorious only if it would give clear & unequivocal/obvious notice to the true owner or his agent visiting the land that the owner’s rights are being invaded Boundary Lines (Mannillo v. Gorski): if an encroachment on a small area is not immediately apparent, a court cannot presume that an owner has actual knowledge of it. However, even if the possession is not sufficiently open to put the owner on notice, an innocent adverse possessor might not be able to relinquish the property without great expense or difficulty. In that case, the true owner might be required to turn over the land in exchange for fair market value.
41
Adverse Possession: Tolling
What can delay the statutory period: under age of majority, being insane, & sometimes deployed out of the country or in prison Tolling effects when statutory periods starts - it doesn’t stop it midway. Disabilities that start after the clock starts to run, do not toll the statute of limitations Some have normal period after disability ends of 5 years But weird 20 year limit of that is maximum time
42
Adverse Possession: Tacking
Tacking is for the adverse possessor to claim more time Combining the times/periods of use for those “in privity” Privity: when 2 or more parties own interest in a property, or between an intended successor & the current property owner/adverse possessor
43
Constructive Adverse Possession
If adverse possessor: - Has a document of title (deed/will) even if invalid (color of title), & - Takes possession of the part of the property described by the document, then - They’re entitled to the whole property described in the document, as long as the other adverse possession elements are met