Unit 1 Flashcards
(43 cards)
Possession vs Ownership
Typically the one who has possession over property is the rightful owner. Possession doesn’t need to be continued - once you possess, you don’t have to always occupy land - you can leave.
Ownership derived from ownership .
Attributes of Ownership
Bundle of Sticks:
- Right to exclude
- Right to transfer
- Right to possess (difference in real vs personal property)
- Right to use
- Right to destroy
Property Theories & Justifications
- First Occupancy
- Labor Theory
- Utilitarianism
- Liberty/Civic Republican Theory
- Personhood Theory
-The Capture Rule - Finders of Personal Property
First Occupancy
Discovery: must “call dibs” (make intention to possess known) & must actually control (obtain possession - control). Used in actual “unowned land” contexts
Doctrine of Conquest: how the rights of one sovereign nation can be taken over by another sovereign nation
If you conquer entire land, all people stay there & own their land but nation changes
People get property rights in real property from the sovereign. Root of title (sovereign) -> first owner -> second owner -> third owner -> current owner
Locke’s Labor Theory
- Human effort & labor is what transforms natural resources into property.
- Because everyone inherently has a property interest in his own person, everybody has a basis to claim the products of his labor as his property as well
- By adding your labor to something a common resource, that improved resource becomes your property
-Caveat: Locke suggests that this principle is justified only when “there is enough, & as good left in common for others”
Utilitarianism
- Indv’s desire to self-maximize will increase landowners wealth & aggregate wealth
- Assumes that humans are natural maximizers, & exist to create value
Civic Republican Theory
- Private property facilities democracy
- Independence of property & land means less reliant on the State
- Landowners hold the majority of power in this society
Personhood Theory
- People become emotionally connected to tangible things
- Those tangible items then become part of their identity
The Capture Rule
- The first person to take possession of a thing owns it; prior in time wins
- The capture rule only applies to wild animals, not domesticated animals
- If you trespass onto someone’s land to capture a wild animal you usually can’t keep it
- Pierson v Post
Finders of Personal Property
Ganter v. Kapiloff
Rule of law: Finders not Keepers. The finder has a superior possessory right over all except for the true owner. Once the true owner (TO) is identified, the finders possessory interest ceases
Benjamin v. Lindner Aviation
Rule of law: mislaid property is awarded to the Locus Owner.
3 types of found property
1. Lost: TO unintentionally parted with it, & is not aware of its location
2. Mislaid: TO intentionally placed it somewhere, but forgot where they placed it
3. Abandoned: the TO no longer intends to reclaim the property
Lost & abandoned property go to the finder; mislaid property goes to the locus owner
Categories of Property
Personal property: movable property, including belongings exclusive of land & buildings
- Tangible: things other than land that are of value solely for what they are, & don’t create a financial claim against someone else
- Intangible: things not of intrinsic value in & of themselves, but which are valuable for what they can purchase or which create financial claim (stocks, bind, bank accounts, money, etc.)
Real property: land & things affixed to land, such as buildings; may sometimes include rights to water, minerals, & airspace rights
Surface Water vs Groundwater
Surface water: encompasses all waters found on the earth’s surface
Groundwater: water which occurs or moves, seeps, filters, or percolates through the ground under the surface of the land
Hydrologically, all kind of same thing/connected. Our law doesn’t recognize that though - 2 separate systems
Approaches to Regulating Surface Water
Riparian system: owners of land adjacent to river are entitled to reasonable use
Prior appropriation: first person to beneficially use water gets it, whether adjacent or not (first claim + beneficial use)
Statutory appropriation system: can use the water in the way the permit specifies - regulated
Doctrine of accession: a person is given the right to use the stream by just owning the property next to it
Regulating Surface Water Drainage
Common Enemy Rule: allows landowners to take any measures to remove or divert surface water, without liability for any damage caused to neighboring properties
Civil Law Rule: requires lower landowners to accept the natural flow of surface water from higher land but prohibits upper landowners from altering drainage in a way that harms other
Reasonable Use Rule: permits landowners to alter surface water drainage as long as the chances are reasonable & don’t cause unnecessary harm to neighboring properties
Surface Water Rights
Prior Appropriation Rule: first in time to validly appropriate = senior right to the water (over later appropriators of surface water). No requirement to share or use reasonably. The use must be beneficial
Absolute Ownership/Capture: focused on possession. The minute you pull water up, it’s yours
Groundwater Rights
Ad coelum + reasonable use: a landowner can extract water beneath their property but only for beneficial use
Rights to Groundwater Extraction
Absolute Dominion Rule (“English Rule”): focus is possession. Landowners have an unlimited right to extract groundwater from their property.
Reasonable Use Rule (“American Rule”): focus is productivity. Landowners can use groundwater for beneficial purposes, but their use cannot unreasonably interfere with the rights of other landowners.
Correlative Rights Doctrine: focus is proportionality. Landowners overlying the same aquifer have a right to a reasonable share of the groundwater supply, with priority given to on-tract use.
Rest: focus is equity & fairness. Uses factor balancing test to determine reasonableness
Prior Appropriation:
The first in time, first in right principle, where those who first legally used groundwater have priority rights.
Property Tort: Conversion
A tort claim for interference with another’s ownership or right to possession of personal property, treating it as if it were D’s own.
Damages are awarded for the full value of the property
What’s needed for a conversion claim: (1) intent to have control & (2) over property of another
Remedies: (1) replevin (give me back my thing) & (2) trover (give me economic value of the thing)
Property Tort: Trespass
A tort involving the unauthorized entry or interference with another’s land or property
Can apply to real property (land) or personal property (chattel)
Jacque v. Steenberg Homes: principle is we don’t want people crossing their land & people should respect that
What’s needed for a trespass claim: (1) knowingly & intentionally go into their property (2) without the landowner’s consent
Don’t need to show actual damage. Doesn’t matter whether or not it creates harm because people will feel loss of autonomy
Competing values: right of access. Legal excuses for trespass: necessity (don’t want property rights to be elevated over human life) & custom
State v. Shack: there’s a limitation on an owner’s right to exclude due to public policy. Cannot harm the rights of others through this exclusion
Balancing test: right to exclude vs right tto access
Property Tort: Nuisance
A person has the freedom to use their property but not in a way to injure someone else
Never have to be on their property (being on would be trespass) but that you create an unreasonable aspect
Liability requires harm
Types: private & public
Nuisance per se: an activity that creates (public) nuisance no matter where it’s located
Nusiance per accidens: a problem of incompatible proximate uses; only nusiance due to location. If both can’t survive, to decide which stays is efficiency calculator
Crosstex North Texas: liability for nuisance requires conduct that substantially interferes with others’ use & enjoyment of property & causes unreasonable discomfort & annoyance
Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co: permanent damages, rather than an injunction, are appropriate if the damages resulting from a nuisance are significantly less than the economic benefit derived from the party causing the harm
Spur Industries Inc: if the public develops land in the vicinity of a public nuisance, the action creating the nuisance must be ceased by the party responsible for its creation, but said party is entitled to compensation
Defenses: P consented or acquiesced; coming to the nusiance (they were there first & you moved next to them knwoing about the nuisance); right-to-farm statutes
Remedies: injunction (typically based on balance of equities) or damages
Private Nusiance
Affects right of indv owner of land or tenant
Public Nusiance
Affects public in general & normally addressed by public ordinanc
Conquest & Capture
The first person to take possession of a thing owns it; prior in time wins (Pierson v. Post & Ghen v. Rich)
Popov v. Hayashi: if a person completes a significant portion of the steps to achieve possession of an time but is thwarted due to the unlawful conduct of another, that person is entitled to a pre-possessory interest of the item
Gov’t Power to Regulate & to Take
Access & Public Accommodations
Eminent Domain
Nuisance & Zoning