Unit 1 - Concept Flashcards

(8 cards)

1
Q

Tweddle v Atkinson (1861)

A
  • Man and woman engaged to be married.
  • Fathers agreed with each other to pay money to Tweddle’s son when married.
  • Father of bride died before paying.
  • Contract said Tweddle’s son had right to sue.
  • But doctrine of privity prevailed: action against the father’s estate failed.

[cf. Contracts (Rights of Third Parties Act 1999]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dunlop v Selfridge (1915)

A
  • Dunlop had an agreement with wholesaler.
    • said must not resell tyres below a set price.
  • Action against retailer failed: not party to contract (and so could not be bound).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

A

s1
Third party can enforce a term if
– s1(1)(a) contract expressly says that they may; or
– s1(1)(b) term purports to confer a benefit on them.
» it is not enough for a contract simply to name a third party.

But:
– s1(2) not if it appears from the contract that the parties did not intend the third party to enforce; or
– s1(3) the third party must be expressly identified by name, member of class, or by answering a particular description.
» though the third party needn’t exist when the contract is formed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Definition of a contract

A

An agreement giving rise to obligations that can be enforced or recognised by law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Legal requirements for formation of an enforceable contract.

A
  • Offer and acceptance (agreement)
  • Intention
  • Consideration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Doctrine of privity (definition and relevant case law)

A

Only the parties to a contract can SUE or BE SUED on it.

E.g. Tweddle v Atkinson (1861), Dunlop v Selfridge (1915).

Except cf. Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 s1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s the case?

  • Man and woman engaged to be married.
  • Fathers agreed with each other to pay money to groom when married.
  • Father of bride died before paying.
  • Contract said groom had right to sue.
  • But doctrine of privity prevailed: action against the father’s estate failed.
A

Tweddle v Atkinson (1861)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What’s the case?

  • Manufacturer had an agreement with wholesaler.
    • said must not resell tyres below a set price.
  • Action against retailer failed: not party to contract (and so could not be bound).
A

Dunlop v Selfridge (1915)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly