unit 1 - moral decision making Flashcards
(34 cards)
characteristics of individuals
cognitive biases
individual differences (personality etc.)
process of individual ethical decision-making behavior (3)
ethical awareness
ethical judgement
ethical behavior
characteristics of organizations
group and organizational pressures
organizational culture
process of individual ethical decision-making behavior
Step 1. Recognize you are facing a moral issue (ethical awarenss)
Step 2. Enter decision making (Ethical judgment)
Step 3. Once decision is made you will engage in ethical behavior (ethical behavior)
moral awareness: recognize moral issues when…
- Peers consider it morally problematic
- Moral language is used when problem is presented
- Decision could cause serious harm
ethical decision making - 8 steps
Step 1: Gather the facts
Step 2: Define the ethical issues
Step 3: Identify the affected parties
Step 4: Identify the consequences
Step 5: Identify the obligations
Step 6: Consider your character and integrity
Step 7: Think creatively about potential actions
Step 8: Check your gut
ethical decision making - 8 steps (further explained)
FEPCO-CAG
Step 1: Gather the facts
Need information
Step 2: Define the ethical issues
Takes work
Balance the obvious and secondary issue
Characteristics of the situation
Step 3: Identify the affected parties
Some judgment rules go further with this (content or people
See who will be impact by your decision
Step 4: Identify the consequences
Look at the consequences of your decision
Step 5: Identify the obligations
Also if you made a promise not just how it would impact others
Step 6: Consider your character and integrity
Think about whether a person with good integrity would do the thing you’re about to do…
Step 7: Think creatively about potential actions
No obvious answer
Solve problem a little slower but looking at alternatives for your solution
Step 8: Check your gut
See if your intuition and see if you did x how you feel about it
moral disagreement theory
“Moral disengagement theory (see Chapter 3) also supports the idea that if people can tell themselves that “everyone is doing it,” they are more likely to engage in unethical conduct.”
illusion of morality
“One important symptom of groupthink is the group’s “illusion of morality,” the sense that the group simply wouldn’t do anything wrong. “
ethical awareness (moral awareness)
With ethical awareness, a person recognizes that a situation or issue is one that raises ethical concerns and must be thought about in ethical terms
neutral vs euphemistic language
neutral language can be used to make an unethical action seem less problematic
euphemistic language can easily keep individuals from thinking about the ethical implications of a decision or action
group norrms
“Everyone’s doing it”
Made by the individual or the work group that you’re around
Rationalizing unethical behavior
Group is telling you their excuses for their behavior/justify
Pressure to go along
Kinda forcing/coercing you into doing something they know is shady but if you go along with it they will feel justified
organizational effects/pressures
Rewards and punishments
- How is pay and bonus system set up
- You might do shady stuff for financial incentives
- If you behave in certain ways and get punished then you are more likely to behave unethically
Roles at work
- What is your job description
- Conflicting roles
- You might need to follow certain ethics but your boss wants you to act in a different way
- Roles may support your behavior in some cases
Diffusion of responsibility
- Cog in the machine so you feel like you have no impact on the bigger picture so if you’re asked to do something unethical you may feel like you should because there is little to no consequences presented
These can encourage OR discourage you from ethical behavior
organizational culture - FORMAL SYSTEMS
Selection/training
- During the hiring process: did they ask ethically related questions? See how flexible you were?
- Training: how organization shapes you
Performance management
- Actual raises and promotions and systems for financial incentives and salaries
- How often are performance evaluation how thorough
Authority structure
- Whether ethical leaders are in place of formal organizations
- Are leaders doing the right thing? Are they ethical managers and training subordinates to be ethical?
organizational culture - INFORMAL SYSTEMS
Role models/heroes
- Who are the people that everyone looks up to? why?
Norms and rituals
- Takes work
- Cultural norms and parties/ceremonies for initiatives to maintain culture
Myths and stories
- What do people say about others in the organization in the past?
cognitive biases
Cognitive biases: How people think that can reduce appropriateness and validity of decisions they make
cognitive biases - fact gathering
Fact gathering
- Overconfidence about your knowledge of the facts
- Think that they got all they need
Falling into confirmation trap
- Once you gather information you might confirm for yourself that that’s the right stuff. Only using parts of data to confirm your beliefs
So… (solution)
- Think about ways that you could be wrong
- What may have I done (bias)?
- What did I miss?
cognitive biases - looking at consequences
Looking at consequences
- Reduced number of consequences
- Brainstorm all possible consequences … you should broaden them
Consequences for self vs. others
- Biased towards our own consequences (how this impacts me)
- Also realize how your actions harm others
Consequences as risk
- Illusion of optimism and illusion of control
- People think they have things under control
- Humans have an optimistic streak (thinking they did the right thing) - this is a BIAS because you should consider how likely things won’t go well
escalation of commitment
- Haunted people in business
- You made a decision and no one will dissuade you from this decision. People cannot stop you from your decision. You are committed to your decision and won’t let it go.
So… (solution)
- Invite input, especially from those who disagree with you
- Talk to others about your decision
- Bring people who disagree with you
- You don’t want yes-men
escalation of commitment
Haunted people in business
You made a decision and no one will dissuade you from this decision. People cannot stop you from your decision. You are committed to your decision and won’t let it go.
cognitive biases - illusion of superiority and ethics of your profession
Illusion of superiority
- Everyone thinks that they are above average
- Must keep in mind that you might not have more integrity than others but you should make yourself stronger
- Don’t assume your actions are right just because you think you have integrity
Ethics of your profession
- Professional codes and ethics - accounting, legal etc. that might match your own morals
- You have to decide between codes vs. what you think about yourself
- Gives you an excuse to do something because of codes
- Code says this but i feel like i shouldn’t do that
So…
Find a middle-ground
Cognitive biases solution: Be aware of biases and make a back-up position
kohlberg’s moral reasoning theory
Kohlberg’s moral reasoning theory is a cognitive developmental theory that focuses primarily on how people think about and decide what course of action is ethically right
Kohlberg’s cognitive moral development theory proposes that moral reasoning develops sequentially through three broad levels, each composed of two stages. As individuals move forward through the sequence of stages, they are cognitively capable of comprehending all reasoning at stages below their own, but they cannot comprehend reasoning more than one stage above their own.
This kind of development can occur through training, but it generally occurs through interaction with peers and life situations that challenge the individual’s current way of thinking
Kohlberg’s cognitive moral development theory (stages): Level 1 (name)
Level 1: Preconventional
“A level I individual (labeled the preconventional level and including stages 1 and 2) is very self‐centered and views ethical rules as imposed from outside the self. Unfortunately, a small percentage of adults never advance beyond this stage, and managers must be ready for that possibility.”
Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation
“Stage 1 individuals are limited to thinking about obedience to authority for its own sake. Avoiding punishment by authority figures is the key consideration.”
Kohlberg’s cognitive moral development theory (stages): Level 2 (name)
Level 2: Conventional
“At level II (labeled the conventional level and including stages 3 and 4), the individual is still externally focused on others but is less self‐centered and has internalized the shared moral norms of society or some segment like a family or work group. “
Stage 3: Interpersonal Accord, Conformity, Mutual Expectations
“At stage 3, what’s right is thought to be that which pleases or helps others or is approved by those close to you. Interpersonal trust and social approval are important”
Stage 4: Social Accord and System Maintenance
“At stage 4, the perspective broadens to consider society. The individual is concerned about fulfilling agreed upon duties and following rules or laws that are designed to promote the common good.”
Kohlberg’s cognitive moral development theory (stages): Level 3 (name)
Level 3: Postconventional or Principled
“A level III (postconventional, sometimes called principled reasoning—stages 5 and 6) principled individual has developed beyond identification with others’ expectations, rules, and laws to make decisions more autonomously.”
Stage 5: Social contract and individual rights
“At stage 5, the emphasis is still on rules and laws because these represent the recognized social contract, but stage 5 thinkers are willing to question the law and to consider changing the law for socially useful purposes. A stage 5 individual would take into account moral laws above society’s laws, such as considering what decision would create the greatest societal good. “
Stage 6: Universal Ethical Principles
“Following ethical principles of justice and rights. Acting in accord with principles when laws violate principles.”