Unit 1 Multiple Choice & Short Answer Flashcards
(188 cards)
What are the “Gold Star Winners” in terms of study methods?
- Low stakes practice testing
- Spacing out learning
What are the “Runners-Up” in terms of study methods?
- Elaborative interrogation
- Self-explanation (or to others)
- Interleaved practice
What are the “Doesn’t Work on Their Own” study methods?
- Highlighting
- Rereading
How do exams affect learning?
test with delayed feedback > test with immediate feedback > test with no feedback > no test in terms of learning enhancement
What is MBE and why is it important?
Education, Psychology, and Neuroscience combined…importance?
1. Effective teaching can benefit from knowing something about the literal organ doing the learning
2. Studying the brain without studying learning is incomplete
3. We need cognitive/ed psych to bridge from “brain scans to lesson plans”
4. MBE is everywhere!!!
What was Bruer’s primary critique in “A Bridge too Far?”
Argued that neuroscience findings must be filtered through cognitive psychology before they can be relevant to education. That is, there is no appropriate DIRECT connection to draw between neuro and ed because “the ed neuro argument relies on three well-established findings but these findings are taken way too far and are misconceived/embellished because we are trying to make a direct jump.”
3 main examples Bruer used to support his argument
- Synaptogenesis
- Critical periods
- Enriched environments
What was Bruer’s synaptogenesis argument?
Charts of synaptic density exhibit peaks in different cortexes early in development (then drop as we age), leading to a misleading view of a “limited window” for learning. Bruer noted that synaptogenesis actually occurs through adolescence and all of adulthood as well, and this misconception could plague education.
What was Bruer’s critical periods argument?
Hubel & Wiesel’s cat experiments showed that ocular dominance columns could only be reorganized prior to 6 moths of age, giving rise to the idea that we have “critical periods.” Bruer noted that while there is a critical/sensitive period for the visual system, there is not a sensitive period for most things. Again, we shouldn’t be making this leap from neuroscience to education without filtering through the data.
What was Bruer’s enriched environments argument?
“Enriched” environments lead to increased synapse formation in rats, so it has been theorized that we should increase stimulation levels in the classroom. Bruer noted that we don’t need to enrich the environment, but rather ensure that it isn’t impoverished. That is, it’s not an issue of enriched vs. standard environments, it’s more of a social issue between standard vs. impoverished.
Why is “building bridges” between neuro and ed so challenging?
- Many studies show learning changes the brain, alters synapses, changes structures, etc. but it is not obvious how this translates to ed. policy or practice. We need a middle-man/translator (cognitive psych according to Bruer) to establish better conceptual framework across different levels of analysis.
- Diversity of approaches between education and cognitive neuroscience is a source of interference.
What are key research methodology differences between education and neuroscience that make bridging the gap challenging (diversity of approaches)?
- Ed. uses randomized controlled trials to improve ed. materials, while neuro uses brain imaging and analyzes behavior to uncover relationships between mind and brain
- Ed. uses large sample sizes, ensuring diverse samples, among classrooms, schools, etc., while neuro uses small samples with limited diversity in highly controlled settings
- Ed. uses high ecological validity, neuro uses low ecological validity
- Ed. has large number of extraneous variables, neuro has small number of extraneous variables
What are some suggestions for building better bridges between education and neuroscience in terms of teacher education and training?
- Increasing scientific/neuro literacy for educators
- Reducing proliferation of neuromyths
- Applying neuroscience data that might affect pedagogy
What are some suggestions for building better bridges between education and neuroscience in terms of researcher education and training?
- Train neuroscientists in educational process and practice with real world constraints
- Think in multidisciplinary ways beyond the lab (external validity)
- Develop new insights in exploring real world problems and solutions
4 different types of possible bridges to link education and neuroscience
- Prescriptive bridge - NeuroEd helping tell educators what to do (Bruer’s critiques)
- Conceptual bridge - NeuroEd helping educators and students understand why certain methods work or don’t work
- Functional bridge - NeuroEd helping tell educators and students what is possible or impossible for the brain to do
- Diagnostic bridge - NeuroEd helping explain how/why a student is learning/struggling based on specific brain activity or anatomy (i.e., special ed)
example of how MBE was successfully used to build diagnostic bridge
Educational research developed a dyslexia remediating phonological difficulties program, and neuroscientists found that successful remediation altered brain networks to resemble typical readers. In this manner, neuroscience supports education by showing WHY particular programs work.
6 different levels of analysis and why they’re important in the context of bridging
“Ed. neuro faces the challenge of connecting these levels to provide coherent, multi-level explanations for learning and informing educational practice and policy:”
1. Sociocultural - learning is a situated activity taking place in a socio-cultural context
2. First-person level - the direct experience of learners reported by the learners themselves
3. Cognitive/behavioral - the study of mental processes
4. Neural - neural systems involved with cognition (uses brain imaging)
5. Genetic - how genetic markers interact with cognitive abilities, structures, and performance
6. Evolutionary - many cognitive abilities are based on evolutionarily recent cultural acquistions but ancient brain systems
What is ecological vs external validity, and how are the two implicated in MBE?
Ecological validity is how relevant or generalizable experimental results are to the real-world, while external validity is how revelant or generalizable experimental results are to instances outside of that experiment.
MBE researchers should prioritize ecological validity, but many experimental lab tasks give up ecological validity to gain experimental control; moreover, constraints of neuroimaging make ecological validity difficult (e.g., can’t bring MRI into classroom)
4 ways to improve ecological validity to help build bridges
- Pre-test/intervention/post-test - test behavioral/neural activity in lab, adminsiter educational intervention, then measure behavioral/neural measures in lab again after intervention
- Classroom studies - collect behavioral/neural data directly in classrooms
- Lab studies with authentic tasks - use authentic, unconstrained natural tasks (e.g., gaming) that are possible in a lab setting
- Individual differences - link differences in skill with differences in brain activation/genetics, etc. to find correlations
Why is it so hard to build bridges in the context of ecological/external validity?
Education research prioritizes authenticity, socio-cultural context, and learners’ first-peson experiences, while brain research prioritizes reproducibility, reliability, and statistical power
4 lobes of the brain and their functions
example of successful study using ecological validity in educational neuroscience to bridge the gap
A meta-analysis found that brain regions that activate when thinking about yourself are also active when engaged in moral thinking. This sparked thought that implementing a moral activity with family members as examples may be more effective, and pre-test/intervention/post-test in-classroom study found that student service hours increased more following teaching involving family/friends in ethical activities.
gray matter
consists of the cortex and nuclei, the outer surface of the brain; soma and dendrites are found here, and gray matter is critical for higher-order thought and cognition
white matter
consists of myelinated axons/axon tracts that connect regions of the cortex; “white” because myelinated axons appear whiteish in color