Unit 13: Indictments and PTPH Flashcards
(55 cards)
What is the indictment?
The document containing the charges against the accused on which the accused is arraigned at the commencement of the trial on indictment.
No draft indictment may be served unless:
The accused has been sent for trial;
HC judge has directed or consented to th preferment of a voluntary bill of indictment;
CC Judge has consented to preferment of a bill of indictment following a declaration by the court approving a deferred prosecution afgreement;
CoA orders a retrial.
Does an indictment that has been served under CrimPR 10 become the indictment where it is not signed?
Yes.
WHo bears ultimate responsibility for the drafting of the indictment?
Counsel for the prosecution.
Save for automatic generation, a draft indictment should be served on appropriate CC officer…
…within 20 days of (a) service of documents where person is sent for trial; or (b) HC consents to preferment of a voluntary bill of indictment.
TRUE or FALSE. The CC can extend the time limit for indictment service?
TRUE.
TRUE or FALSE. A draft indictment may include charges for any indictable offence disclosed by the evidence served under the regulations for the service of the prosecution case after accused has been sent.
True.
If the drafter include a count for an offence in respect of which the accused was not sent…
…ensure the offence is disclosed by the statements.
Provide as much notice as possible to the accused.
The basic requirements of an indictment’s layout are:
(a) each offence charges should be set out in a separate count.
(b) each count should be divided into a statement of offence and particulars of offence;
(c) describe the offence in ordinary language and refer to statutory provisions (if any)
(d) give such particulars as may be necessary for giving reasonable information as to the nature of the charge.
Should a count state the date on which the offence occurred?
Yes, insofar as it is known.
The rule against duplicity states:
A count must allege that an offence occurred on one day, not on several days.
What is the exception to the duplicity rule?
Continuous offences which take place over a period of time.
Give an example of a continuous offence.
Conspiracy
More than one incident of a the commission of an offence may be included in a count if…
…those incidents together amount to a course of conduct having regard to time, place or purpose of commission.
Crim PR 10.2(2) allows a single count to allege multiple incidents of the commission of the offence. Examples of when this is appropriate:
(a) the victim on each occasion was the same, or there was no identifiable individual victim as, for example, in a case of the unlawful importation of controlled drugs or of money laundering;
(b) the alleged incidents involved a marked degree of repetition in the method employed or in their location, or both;
(c) the alleged incidents took place over a clearly defined period, typically (but not necessarily) no more than about a year;
(d) in any event, the defence is such as to apply to every alleged incident without differentiation. Where what is in issue differs between different incidents, a single ‘multiple incidents’ count will not be appropriate, though it may be appropriate to use two or more such counts according to the circumstances and to the issues raised by the defence.
Joint trials: The court may order separate trials unless
The offences to be tried together are founded on the same facts, or form part of a series of offences of the same or similar character.
True or false. Joinder can apply where later offences would not have been committed but for the prior commission of an earlier offence.
True. the test is whether the charges have a comon factual origin.
To show the existence of a series of offences, the prosecution must point to
A nexus between them.
When will the prosecution proceed by way of specimen/sample counts?
Where P is accused of adoptign a systematic course of criminal conduct and it is not appropriate to allege a continuous offence or multiple offending count.
Is there a need to distinguish between principal offenders and secondary parties in a joint offence count?
No.
If two accused a charged on a joint count, must the verdict for them be same the same?
No.
Joinder of accused is appropriate if
…The offences separately alleged against the accused are, on the evidence, so closely related by time or other factors that the interests of justice are best served by a single trial.
Where counts for separate offences can be tried together, the trial judge is able to exercise discretion to order separate trials if…
…the joint trial would be prejudicial or embarassing for some reason, or if some other feature makes that course desirable.
TRUE or FALSE. Where the accused are charged in a joint count, the arguments in favour of a joint trial are strong
TRUE.