Unit 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Kant’s two moral/ Categorical imperatives?

A

objective is universal
I should act in a way that I would want everyone else in the world to act
Always treat others the way you would want to be treated
Treat others never simply as a means but also an end
People should never be treated only as a means (w/out regard to their dignity or their working condition)
Never use people just to get what you want

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is Kant’s “kingdom” a utopia?

A

It is his idea of a perfect world
Treat others as a end not a means
Act other of their rational will
No one would act on any principle that could not be made universal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why according to Kant’s, is it wrong to make a false promise under any circumstance?

A

It fails to respect other
By lying: A) we deny the other person autonomy (the freedom to make an informed decision on the basis of good will)
B) we use the other as a means to achieve our end, or purpose of the person being lied to
Very black and white ie. of Anne Frank (Nazi)
It is not kind or respectful and we should not use it for selfish reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain Kant’s distinction between theoretical reason and practical reason.

A

Theoretical

Come to know the laws of nature and the cause and effect govern human behavior
Ex. We know the effect of alcohol consumption on the body
Areas of life where freedom of choice is not an issue
We can only know what people actually do

Practical
Moral dimension guiding human behavior
We know that we ought not to drink and drive
Humans act both on impulse as affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the supreme good and how do the three practical principles enable humans to achieve it?

A

God
Humans can not get SG on their own
Kant says that the existence of God allows us to achieve it
Freedom
If SG is to be our achievement, then we ought to do what we can do
(to have the duty to do something, we must to be able to do it)
Kant says that humans are by nature free
Immortality
Impossible to gain SG fully in this life
Achieve the SG in the beyond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define good will, according to Kant

A

Is the will to do our duty for no other reason that it is our duty most precious possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain how Kant’s ethics is deontological

A

Greek work (deon) means = duty

WILL = CENTRAL
impulses > draw us away from duty
desires > draw us away from duty
WILL = FINITE
* do NOT always act according to our duty*

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does Levinas oppose traditional western notions of being?

A

Westernars attempt to overcome all difference and diversity by grouping everything under an ALL-ENCOMPASSING “being”. Therefore, everything carries a stamp of sameness.
Westerners think out of a unified TOTALITY (away from difference)
DIFFERENCE is reduced to being accidental
→ accidental = not essential b/c it changes in every ind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What impact did the Holocaust have on Levinas’ ethics?

A

Heightened his awareness of his Jewish root
Searched for Jewish teacher: Mordechai Chouchani
Become instructed in ways of Jewish Talmud = began to lecture on the subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does Levinas understand the Good?

A

Good is beyond ‘being’/interested not in what is in common things BUT in what is unique about each per on/thg
UNIQUE THINGS/ PERSON = TRACES OF THE GOOD (GOD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the connection between the human face and the Good

A

The eyes are windows to your soul- in the eyes you have immediate, direct contact w/ the other.
Here, you see their uniqueness which requires absolute respect.
Therefore, good = responsibility for the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the authority of the face, “the other”.

A

The face is an authority “HIGHNESS, HOLINESS, DIVINITY”. In the look, the other is not my equal but my superior. The superiority of the face comes from the other stranger - at this point, the face becomes ethical. (it is like a please I need you).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does one become happy according to Aristotle?

A

If and only if, over a long period of time one often performs (w/ some success) the most perfect of typically human things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does Aristotle understand the good?

A

Good permits human beings to reach our potential - what is our internal compass * what we are intended to be*

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Aristotle connect reason, ethical behavior, happiness and good character?

A

To act ethically, is to engage our capacity to reason as we develop good character (that is the highest form of happiness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does Aristotle connect habits and virtues? How do you think he would relate vices to habits?

A

When people seek to become who they are intended to be, they develop habits that represent the best of what it means to be human.
These excellences = virtues
Therefore, to act virtuous: a) to do things well
b) to act successfully as a human being (allowing reason to guide one’s actions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain the relevance of the following quote from Hamlet: “Assume the virtue, even if you have it not, For use almost can change the stamp of nature.”

A

Our ability to perform proper functions (actions) is in no way enhanced by knowing them. Since the virtues are characteristic (fixed capacities for actions, acquired by habit) merely knowing what is good and healthy does not - by itself - usually lead to doing what is good and healthy - as most of us realize. Happiness requires action.

18
Q

Explain Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean

A

Be moderate in all things

19
Q

Generally speaking, what is the main concern of ethics?

A

Ethics is about the “goodness” in human life.

20
Q

Differentiate the responses of Aristotle, Kant, Levinas and religious people to the questions, “How and when does human life reflect what is good?” and “How do we aim at the good life”?

A

Aristotle = reflect on the aim of human life
Kant = reflect on the obligation derived from respect for the law
Levinas = responsibility to the Other, obedience to the will of God
Each have different perspectives on the search for the good
Others meanings of good/evil
Right/wrong
How societies and cultures answer “what is good”

21
Q

Through whom did Aristotle come to the attention of the Catholic Church?

A

Thomas Aquinas (AD 1225-74) through Arab scholars.

22
Q

role does politics play in Aristotle’s ethics?

A

Aristotle is concerned with the POLIS (Greek city state), not the individual. Human life is shaped to its full extent in the context of community.

23
Q

What does Aristotle identify as that to which all human beings aspire?

A

To find happiness.

24
Q

How does Aristotle define happiness?

A

The condition of the good person who succeeds in living well and acting well.

25
Q

What is freedom?

A

“Freedom is the power to act, and so to perform deliberate acts of one’s own. Freedom attains perfection in its acts when directed towards God, the sovereign good.”

26
Q

Freedom and ‘The will’

A

Freedom presupposes (requires) a will
-When we exercise our will, we act out of freedom
-“I will” to teach or “I will” to learn –but I do not “will” to breathe or “will” to sleep

27
Q

WILL (Intention) + ACTION = WILLED (Intended) ACT

A

“a moral act” is not an act alone – it is a willed act
“the will” is an invisible component
We believe it exists because we believe in justice – without a will there is no justice
WILL+ACT=WILLED ACT

28
Q

NATURALISM

A

Every action is the effect of some cause
Free will is only an illusion
We are not responsible for our actions because we do not and cannot will them
CAUSE+ACT=CAUSED ACT

29
Q

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

A

Refers to intelligent computers—computers that can think
Thinking involves reasoning, creativity, intending, reflecting, remembering, anticipating, imagining, judging, etc…
Strong A.I.: some scientists believe that we will be able to create computers that will possess all of the above attributes of thinking and more

30
Q

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND FREEDOM

A

If A.I. thinks, free will might have to be denied
All meaningful actions will be the product of an intention that has a cause
Because the cause is an external influence, all intentions and actions stemming from it cannot carry any moral value
According to Naturalism, the external influence on a computer’s processing is the program it is running = the program is created by a software developer
According to Naturalism, the external influence on a person’s thinking is his/her DNA – our DNA is created by nature

31
Q

Artificial intelligence = no morality

A

Program/Cause (has no moral value), Intention (has no moral cause), action (has no moral cause)

32
Q

THE MIND-BRAIN PROBLEM: The Brain is physical but what is the mind?

A

DESCARTES: maintained that thought exists independently of all physical realities, including the brain.
NATURALISM: argues that the mind (thought) and the brain are one.

33
Q

PHYSICAL AND SPIRITUAL REALITY: “THE MIND IS NOT THE BRAIN”

A

apprehending God, hope, and love cannot be accounted by neural physiology
Catholic teaching refers to the human person as being at once physical and spiritual (CCC #362)
The Catechism describes the “soul” as our “innermost aspect” and “that which is of greatest value” in us. The soul, it says, signifies our “spiritual principle”
(CCC #363)
“The spiritual tradition of the Church also emphasizes the heart…the depths of one’s being, where the person decides for or against God” (CCC #368)

34
Q

RELIGIOUS DETERMINISM: KANT VS CALVIN

A

KANT:
-Freedom is a practical matter – it is a matter of what we do (practice), not why we do it (theory)
-We cannot logically know what causes us to act freely. We only know that we do. Our fascination with justice is evidence of this, since justice presupposes (requires) freedom.

JOHN CALVIN: the French Protestant reformer and theologian (1509-1564) disagrees:
-God has predetermined who is saved and who is not. Our choices have no impact on our fates. Freedom and ethics have no place in the doctrine of predestination.
-Divine justice does not presuppose (require) human freedom

35
Q

ST. AUGUSTINE AND FREE WILL

A

-“It is certain that we will when we will; but He [God] brings it about that we act, but that without His help we neither will anything good nor do it.”
-This means that while we possess intention, we cannot intend or do anything good without God’s help.

36
Q

SOCIAL DETERMINISM AND FREUD

A

-social determinism teaches that a person’s actions are shaped or determined by her/his social influences – EXAMPLE: an abused child becomes a child abuser or a loved child becomes a loving adult
-here, what we do is a consequence of external causes
-thus, there is no moral value attached to abusing or loving

37
Q

FREUD AND THE UNCONSCIOUS

A

-painful, shameful memories or shameful desires can be edited out of our consciousness
-they survive in our unconscious and silently drive our conscious behaviour
-when you act out of your unconscious, your behaviour patterns are what Freud would call “neurotic”
-at this level, you could call Freud’s theory of the unconscious deterministic
-until you reconnect with the repression and what gave rise to the repression, your actions are not free
-thus, you cannot be held directly responsible for your actions

38
Q

FREUD AND INSTINCT

A

-Freud believed that 2 primary instincts motivated our behaviour:
LIFE INSTINCTS: prompts us to do everything that is life-affirming from loving to the sexual drive
DEATH INSTINCTS: motivates us to deny life – it causes us to be aggressive and even kill

39
Q

WHO THEN IS THE SELF?

A
  • Being in harmony with our instincts causes us to be fully human and completely amoral
    *Morality is artificial – it is an imposition on our instincts and produces further aggression
    *The Moral Voice inside our heads is our super-ego = the voice of someone we have placed above ourselves
40
Q

YOUR WILL AND YOUR ACTIONS DETERMINE WHO YOU ARE:

A

The following all argue against the existence of “the will” as a real entity
*Naturalism
*Religious Determinism
*Strong A.I.
*Freud

41
Q

BUT AS CATHOLICS…

A

-we regard our will as God’s most precious gift to us
-the will enables us to be like God – to create out of nothing
-for nothing external forces the will
-the will to act comes from within