Unit 2: Questions Flashcards
(26 cards)
Gammon v Hong Kong ltd
Strict liability
Outlined rules for strict liability
1. Must be in favour of MR
2. Can’t be used when criminal case
Shah v London
Strict liability - Social concern
Child under 16 bought lottery ticket (gambling)
R v White
Causation - But for Test
Cyanide in mothers cup, died before drinking. But for his actions she would have still died
Alpha cell v Woodward
Strict liability - protecting enviroment
Tried to prevent pollution, but polluted water when making paper in factory
R v smith
Causation
D kept falling off stretcher and died of injuries
R v Jordan
Causation - Novus Actus
Wrong antibiotics were given and died of result
R v Roberts
Causation - D’s own actions
Jumped out of car, feared driver
R v Blaue
Thin skull rule
Could not have blood transfusion and died. Take victim as you find them
Hill v Baxter
Omissions
If driving and attacked by bees, would not be guilty
Define omissions
Failure to act when you have a duty to do so
Dytham
Omission - contact duty
Policeman did not stop a fight when on duty outside a club
R v Miller
Omissions - failure to act in situation
cigarette on a mattress caused fire, woke up and did not out fire out
R v pittwood
Omissions- contractual duty
Did not close train gate when on break while in duty
Gibbons v proctor
Omissions- family relationship
Man did not feed child as it was stepdaughter not actual daughter
Define Mens Rea
Having the guilty mind, can be split into three parts:
Mohan
MR - Direct intent
“The decision to bring about, lies within such powers to the actual actual consequence”
Woolin
MR - Indirect intent
Threw baby in pram, missed and baby died
R v Cunningham
MR - Recklessness
Tried to break gas meter, caused gas leak and damaged neighbours
Define recklessness
MR
Having an unjustified risk
And D takes the risk anyway
Define indirect intent
MR
Result was virtually certain to happen
D knew the risk, but took it anyway
Define strict liability
Offences that do not require Mens Rea only Actus Rea
Sweet v Parsley
Strict Liability
Teacher allowed student to use summer cottage, was not aware of drug abuse
Reasons for Strict liability
Strict liability Saves time - "speeding tickets" Protecting Public Social concern Protecting enviroment
R v Latimer
Transferred Malice
Man tried to hit someone with belt, missed and hit someone else