Unit 2: Questions Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

Gammon v Hong Kong ltd

A

Strict liability
Outlined rules for strict liability
1. Must be in favour of MR
2. Can’t be used when criminal case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Shah v London

A

Strict liability - Social concern

Child under 16 bought lottery ticket (gambling)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v White

A

Causation - But for Test

Cyanide in mothers cup, died before drinking. But for his actions she would have still died

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Alpha cell v Woodward

A

Strict liability - protecting enviroment

Tried to prevent pollution, but polluted water when making paper in factory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v smith

A

Causation

D kept falling off stretcher and died of injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Jordan

A

Causation - Novus Actus

Wrong antibiotics were given and died of result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Roberts

A

Causation - D’s own actions

Jumped out of car, feared driver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Blaue

A

Thin skull rule

Could not have blood transfusion and died. Take victim as you find them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hill v Baxter

A

Omissions

If driving and attacked by bees, would not be guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define omissions

A

Failure to act when you have a duty to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dytham

A

Omission - contact duty

Policeman did not stop a fight when on duty outside a club

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Miller

A

Omissions - failure to act in situation

cigarette on a mattress caused fire, woke up and did not out fire out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v pittwood

A

Omissions- contractual duty

Did not close train gate when on break while in duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gibbons v proctor

A

Omissions- family relationship

Man did not feed child as it was stepdaughter not actual daughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Mens Rea

A

Having the guilty mind, can be split into three parts:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mohan

A

MR - Direct intent

“The decision to bring about, lies within such powers to the actual actual consequence”

17
Q

Woolin

A

MR - Indirect intent

Threw baby in pram, missed and baby died

18
Q

R v Cunningham

A

MR - Recklessness

Tried to break gas meter, caused gas leak and damaged neighbours

19
Q

Define recklessness

A

MR
Having an unjustified risk
And D takes the risk anyway

20
Q

Define indirect intent

A

MR
Result was virtually certain to happen
D knew the risk, but took it anyway

21
Q

Define strict liability

A

Offences that do not require Mens Rea only Actus Rea

22
Q

Sweet v Parsley

A

Strict Liability

Teacher allowed student to use summer cottage, was not aware of drug abuse

23
Q

Reasons for Strict liability

A
Strict liability
 Saves time - "speeding tickets"
 Protecting Public
 Social concern 
 Protecting enviroment
24
Q

R v Latimer

A

Transferred Malice

Man tried to hit someone with belt, missed and hit someone else

25
Pembleton
Transferred Malice | Threw stone into crowd, missed and broke window
26
Define Transferred Malice
When the crime moved from the intended victims to the actual victim. Must be both from the same nature