Unit 3 AOS 2 Civil law - 3.2.10 CAV Flashcards
(13 cards)
What is CAV
Consumer Affairs Victoria: Victoria’s consumer affair regulator
4 purposes of CAV
Advise the government on consumer legislation
Enforce compliance
Provide consumers and manufacturers, tenants and landlors with a dispute resolution body
Assist civil disputes to be settled and parties reach an agreement through conciliation
Jurisdiction of CAV
Tenants and landlors
Supply of goods and services:
Purchases and suppliers
Consumers and supplies
Dispute resolution method used in CAV
CAV only uses conciliation
Independant third party faciliates discussion and offers suggestions to help parties reach an agreement
When is CAV suitable
- When partis have tried to resolve the dipsute
- Jursidiction is appropriate
- Willing to cooperate
- Parties want to come to their own decision
- Financial situation is considered (CAV is free)
When is CAV not suitable
- For landlords, manufacturers or suppliers
- Want a binding decision to be handed down
- Formality of court is prefered
- If the matter is urgent, CAV has limited resouces and only one location
Strength of CAV: Free
CAV is completely free, increases access for all Victorians regardless of their ability to pay
Weakness of CAV: Limited jurisdiction
Can only hear complaintss from tenants and consumers
No power to assist other disputes, reduces access for certain parties
Strength of CAV: informality
Informal setting
Can be conducted over the phone
removes anxieites and intimidations
More people can participate openly, upholding fairness
Weakness of CAV: Power imbalance
Due to CAV’s informal nature, a power imbalance cannot be amended
Reduces an equitable outcome
Strength of CAV: Procedural fairness
Both parties can present their case, rebut the other side
Ensures both parties can openly pariticipate in CAV’s processes, upholding fairness
Strength of CAV: Parties reach the decision themselves
Conciliation means a decision cannot be imposed on parties
they must reach an agreement themsevles, more likely to be happy with the outcome as its win-win
Increases access, both parties engage in the processess
Weakness of CAV: Not legally binding decisions
Unless parties sign a deed of settlement, CAV has no power of enfrocing any decision
One party may ignore the outcome, so they may have to use the courts
increases delays and access