Unit 3: Area of Study 1 - The Victorian Criminal Justice System Flashcards

(166 cards)

1
Q

Principles of Justice

A
  • Fairness
  • Equality
  • Access
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fairness in the Criminal Justice System

A

Is where an individual has a fair and unbiased hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How Fairness is Upheld in the Criminal Justice System (List 2)

A
  • By having an impartial Adjudicator
  • By understanding Court processes
  • Having the opportunity to Appeal a case
  • The availability of legal representation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Equality in the Criminal Justice System

A

Is how all people should be treated equally under the law and have an equal opportunity to present their case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How Equality is Upheld in the Criminal Justice System (List 1)

A
  • The use of a Judge and Jury

- The extent to which the law applies to everybody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Access in the Criminal Justice System

A

Is how people should be able to understand their legal rights and have their case heard in a Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How Access is Upheld in the Criminal Justice System (List 2)

A
  • Plea Negotiations
  • Sentence Indications
  • Being able to have your case heard without long delays
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Parties in a Criminal Case

A
  • Prosecution

- Defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Prosecution

A

Is the party who brings the Criminal Case to Court. This is the Crown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Accused

A

The person who is charged with a Criminal Offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of Criminal Offences

A
  • Summary Offences

- Indictable Offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Summary Offences

A

Minor Criminal Offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Court that Hears Summary Offences

A

Magistrate’s Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is a Jury Present when Hearing Summary Offences?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Name of the Final Hearing when Summary Offences are committed

A

Hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Examples of Summary Offences

A
  • Common Assault

- Traffic Offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Sanctions for Summary Offences

A
  • Fines

- Short Terms of Imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Indictable Offences

A

Are serious Criminal Offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Courts that Hear Indictable Offences

A
  • County Court

- Supreme Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Is a Jury Present when Hearing Indictable Offences?

A

Yes, if the Accused pleads ‘Not Guilty’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Name of the Final Hearing when Indictable Offences are Committed

A

Trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Examples of Indictable Offences

A
  • Murder

- Rape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Sanctions for Indictable Offences

A
  • Large Fines

- Long Prison Sentences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Indictable Offences Heard Summarily

A

Is an Indictable Offence that is heard in the Magistrates’ Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Examples of Indictable Offences Heard Summarily (List 2)
- Theft - Robbery - Burglary under $100,000
26
Sanctions for Indictable Offences Heard Summarily
- Fines | - Short Terms of imprisonment
27
Burden of Proof
Is the party in a case who has the responsibility to prove the guilt of the Accused
28
Who has the Burden of Proof in a Criminal Case?
The Prosecution
29
Standard of Proof
Is the level of confidence in the evidence of the case that is required
30
What is the Standard of Proof in a Criminal Case?
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
31
What does Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Mean?
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt means that the decision must be free from all reasonable doubts. All (or most) Jurors must agree that the Standard of Proof is Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
32
Presumption of Innocence
Is how all Accused persons are assumed innocent until or if they are proven guilty
33
Ways that the Presumption of Innocence is Upheld
- The Accused having the Right to Silence | - The Burden of Proof resting with the Prosecution
34
Rights of the Accused
- The right to be tried without unreasonable delay - The right to a fair hearing - The right to trial by Jury
35
The Right to be Tried Without Unreasonable Delay
Is how all accused have the right to have their matter heard within a reasonable timeframe
36
Sources of the Right to be Tried Without Unreasonable Delay
Sections 21 and 25 of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights
37
Consequences of Failing to Uphold The Right to be Tried Without Unreasonable Delay
- "Justice too long delayed is justice denied" | - Witnesses may forget key information due to the length between the incident and the Hearing/Trial
38
The Right to a Fair Hearing
Is how the Accused has the right to have their case heard by a competent, independent and impartial Court
39
Source of The Right to a Fair Hearing
Section 24 of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights
40
The Right to Trial by Jury
Is how under the Criminal Procedure Act, a trial by Jury must take place if the Accused has pleaded Not Guilty
41
Sources of The Right to Trial by Jury
The Australian Constitution and Victorian Statute Law
42
How the Rights of the Accused Upholds the Principles Justice: Fairness (List 2)
- Quicker Resolution: The right to be tried without unreasonable delay upholds Fairness as the Accused people/s or victim/s do not have to endure prolonged anxiety and stress of waiting for the resolution of their case - Fair Trial: The right to a fair trial upholds fairness as Accused persons are given the best possible opportunity to defend charges against them and test the accuracy of evidence presented by the Prosecution, for victims to have their say and for legal representatives to build the best case for their clients - Unbiased: The right to a fair hearing ensures decisions are based on the law and the facts, not on bias or prejudice
43
How the Rights of the Accused Upholds the Principles Justice: Equality (List 2)
- Minimises Delays: The right to be tried without unreasonable delay upholds Equality as all Accused persons, irrespective of the circumstances of their case, the crime they are accused of or their personal characteristics, will not have to endure unreasonable delays - Same Process for all Accused: The right to a fair hearing upholds Equality as the same fundamental rules of evidence and procedure apply for all Accused persons - Jury Trials: Equality is achieved as all Accused persons have the right to be tried by a Jury of their peers if they have been accused of an Indictable Offence, regardless of their personal circumstances
44
How the Rights of the Accused Upholds the Principles Justice: Access (List 2)
- Timely: The right to be tried without unreasonable delay upholds Access because if cases are resolved in a timely manner, case backlogs may be relieved, enabling other matters to move through the Criminal Justice System more swiftly - Just Outcome: The right to a fair hearing upholds Access as Accused persons are given the best possible chance to achieve a just outcome - Community Involvement: The right to trial by jury upholds Access as members of the public are able to engage with and participate in the Criminal Justice System, all Accused persons may access Jury trial, as the state bears the cost
45
Rights of the Victim
- The Right to give Evidence as a Vulnerable Witness - The Right to be Informed about Proceedings - The Right to be Informed of the Likely Release Date of the Accused
46
Vulnerable Witness
Is a person who is under the age of 18, suffers from a mental disability, is an alleged victim of a sexual offence or is an alleged victim of family violence
47
Victims' Register
Is a database that is maintained by the state of Victoria to provide the victims of violent crimes with relevant information about prisoners whilst they are in prison
48
The Right to Give Evidence as a Vulnerable Witness
Is how certain victims who are witnesses to a crime may be entitled to be vulnerable and therefore able to give evidence to the Court in alternative ways
49
Alternative ways Vulnerable Witnesses Can Give Evidence (List 2)
- The Witness can give evidence from another location via CCTV - Screens can be erected so that the Witness cannot see the accused in the Courtroom - The Court may approve a 'support person' to sit beside the Witness
50
Sources of the Right to Give Evidence as a Vulnerable Witness
Provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act and the Evidence Act
51
The Right to be Informed About Proceedings
Is how the Police and OPP must inform the Victim about their rights to support services ad the progress of the investigation. Once the Prosecution has started, they must inform the Victim of any charges and how they can find out details of the trial, including the outcome
52
Sources of The Right to be Informed About Proceedings
Sections 7, 8, 9 of the Victims' Charter
53
The Right to be Informed of the Likely Release Date of the Accused
If a person is a Victim of a criminal act of violence and are on the Victims' Register, they may receive information about the likely release date of the prisoner
54
Source of The Right to be Informed of the Likely Release Date of the Accused
Section 17 of the Victims' Charter
55
Parole
Is the supervised and conditional release of a prisoner after a minimum prison term has been sentenced
56
If a Victim is Placed on the Victims Register, they may be Entitled to Know Information Such as (List 2)
- The length of the Offender's sentence - Earliest Parole date - Changes to the length of the Offender's sentence - Escape from Prison - Offender's death during Prison
57
Institutions that are Available to Assist an Accused Person
- Victorian Legal Aid (VLA) | - Community Legal Centres (CLC's)
58
Victorian Legal Aid (VLA)
Is a Government agency which provides free legal advice and information regarding a range of legal matters at low or no cost
59
Duty Lawyer
Is a Lawyer that gives advice (and sometimes representation) at the Magistrates' and/or Children's Court for minor matters
60
Means Tests
Is a test which assess the applicant's income, assets and expenses to see if they qualify for assistance
61
Income Test
Is a test to see whether the applicant's income is low enough to qualify for assistance
62
Roles of Victorian Legal Aid (List 2)
- Provide free legal information - Provide free legal advice for eligible people such as the disabled, homeless, under 18 and that do not have enough money - Provide a Duty Lawyer - Undertakes Income Tests - Undertakes Means Tests
63
Strengths of Victorian Legal Aid in Promoting Fairness (List 1)
- VLA's eligibility criteria for a grant of legal assistance/legal representation ensure those most at risk of a serious sanction are at least able to afford a private lawyer and are provided with legal representation - The provision of Duty Lawyers in the Magistrates' Court provides advice and assistance to some Accused persons, ensuring a Fairer hearing for those individuals
64
Weaknesses of Victorian Legal Aid in Promoting Fairness (List 1)
- VLA's strict eligibility criteria and a very tight budget means it is only able to provide legal advice and representation to a small number of Accused persons, many Accused persons charged with Criminal Offences do not meet VLA's eligibility criteria but cannot afford a private Lawyer; as a result, VLA is limited in its ability to ensure Fairness across the Criminal Justice System - Duty lawyers are not available to all accused persons in the Magistrates' Court
65
Strengths of Victorian Legal Aid in Promoting Equality (List 1)
- VLA's eligibility criteria ensure legal support is provided to those most in need regardless of their personal characteristics such as race, religion, gender etc. This promotes Equality in the administration of Justice - All members of society regardless of their personal characteristics such as wealth, religion etc. can access all of VLA's published information
66
Weakness of Victorian Legal Aid in Promoting Equality
- The strict eligibility criteria for legal assistance means that many accused persons are unable to get support from VLA and are therefore unrepresented. VLA can only represent the very poor since the rich can get their own personal Lawyers. The people in the middle may need to represent themselves since they don't fit in the criteria
67
Strength of Victorian Legal Aid in Promoting Access
VLA publishes free information about Criminal Proceedings and the Court System, improving many Accused Persons' understandings of the Legal System and how to defend the alleged charges
68
Weaknesses of Victorian Legal Aid in Promoting Access (List 1)
- Information published by VLA about the Legal System is general and limited to some disputes. Because of this, it promotes the understanding of the Legal System for only some Accused Persons - A lot of VLA's information about the Criminal Justice System is provided online; those with low incomes, the homeless or the elderly may not have access to a device that is connected to internet and because of this, they cannot get any legal advice
69
Community Legal Centres
Community Legal Centres are independent community organisations that provide free legal services to the public
70
Roles of Community Legal Centres (List 2)
- Provides basic information (mostly online) - Provides initial Legal advice in the Centre or over the phone - Provides Duty Lawyers at the Court for urgent matters
71
Strength of Community Legal Centres in Promoting Fairness
Even though the information that is provided by CLC'S is limited, as an accused person who has sought advice from a CLC is in a better position to present their Defence in its best light, promoting Fairness
72
Weakness of Community Legal Centres in Promoting Fairness
CLC's often provide legal advice and casework for relatively minor Criminal Matters and cannot assist those who have committed Indictable Offences
73
Strength of Community Legal Centres in Promoting Equality
CLC's often provide an Interpreter service to ensure those from non-English speaking backgrounds can access Legal Assistance in a language they understand, promoting Equality in the Justice System
74
Weakness of Community Legal Centres in Promoting Equality
As CLC's usually provide limited assistance to those charged with Summary Offences and do not help those people who have been charged with Indictable Offences
75
Strength of Community Legal Centres in Promoting Access
CLC's provide free Legal Advice and information, meaning education on the Justice System is accessible to all people within the CLC's local community
76
Weakness of Community Legal Centres in Promoting Access
Relatively few CLC's are located in rural parts of Victoria, limiting Access to Legal Information and advice for those in remote areas
77
Committal Proceeding
Is a pre-trial procedure that aims to determine the Guilt of an Accused person. This occurs in the Magistrates' Court when the Accused has been charged with one or more Indictable Offences and has pleaded 'Not Guilty' or has not pleaded at all yet
78
Committal Hearing
Is the main and final stage of Committal Proceedings, which allows the Accused to question the Prosecution's Witnesses and make submissions about Charges. If the Magistrate determines there is sufficient evidence, the Accused will stand Trial. If the Magistrate determines there is not enough evidence, the accused will be allowed to go free. However, they can be brought back if more evidence is found
79
Purposes of Committal Hearings (List 2)
- To determine whether a charge for an Indictable Offence is appropriate to be heard and determined Summarily - To decide if there is enough evidence to support a Conviction - To find out if the accused plans to plead Guilty or Not Guilty - To ensure a Fair Trial, if the matter proceeds to Trial
80
Strengths of Committal Proceedings (List 2)
- Helps filter out weak cases - Allows the accused to be informed of the Prosecutor's case against them - The Onus is on the Prosecutor to establish enough Evidence - It may result in withdrawal or combination of Charges - It gives the Accused the opportunity to test the strength of the Prosecutor's case
81
Weaknesses of Committal Proceedings (List 2)
- Complicated process and can be unfair for an unrepresented party - They can be expensive - They can add to delays - They can contribute to stress and inconvenience of the Accused, Victims and families - It may be considered unnecessary for stronger cases
82
How Committal Proceedings Achieves Fairness
Committal Proceedings filters out weaker cases, allowing efficiency in the Courts, which ultimately reduces time delays
83
How Committal Proceedings Does not Achieve Fairness
If the Magistrate finds insufficient evidence, the Department of Public Prosecutions may still commit the Accused to stand trial
84
How Committal Proceedings Achieves Equality
Committal Proceedings allow both Parties to be informed of the evidence that is against them
85
How Committal Proceedings Does not Achieve Equality
The process of Committal Proceedings is very difficult without Legal Representation, which makes it unequal compared to the Prosecution who have access to a panel of experienced Lawyers
86
How Committal Proceedings Achieves Access
Committal Proceedings enhances Access to the Legal System as the Accused sees all the evidence against them to decide on their Plea
87
How Committal Proceedings Do not Achieve Access
The processes surrounding Committal Proceedings is hard to navigate if the Accused is unrepresented
88
Plea Negotiations
Is an informal process between the Accused, the Lawyer and the Prosecution where negotiations are made for the Accused to agree to Plea Guilty to fewer Charges or a Lesser Charge such as agreeing to Plea Guilty to Manslaughter instead of Murder
89
Purposes of Plea Negotiations
- To resolve a case efficiently and secure a Conviction | - To avoid the stress of a Trial for those involved, such as a Vulnerable Witness
90
When are Plea Negotiations Appropriate? (List 2)
- When the Accused is willing to cooperate - When the Prosecution has a strong case - When Witnesses are willing to provide Evidence
91
Strengths of Plea Negotiations (List 2)
- They save the costs that are associated with a full Trial or Hearing - It ensures a quick determination of Criminal Cases - Victims and others are saved from the trauma, inconvenience and distress of the trial process - They will lead to a certain outcome
92
Weaknesses of Plea Negotiations (List 2)
- Victims and the community may feel the accused's 'let off' or will get a lenient sentence - The Accused may feel pressured into accepting a deal - It avoids the need for the Prosecutor to prove the case 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' - Negotiations are held privately and do not need to be disclosed - If the Negotiations do not succeed, either Party may get an insight into the other Party's case
93
Sentence Indications
Are given out by the Court to let the Accused know what their Sanction is likely to be if they are to Plead Guilty. This can be used for both Summary and Indictable Offences if the Accused applies and the Prosecution agrees. They cannot be used against the Accused if they proceed with the Trial and the Sentence imposed must not be more severe than the Indication
94
Purposes of Sentence Indications
- They provide a level of certainty for the Accused about what their sentence is likely to be - It reduces the time that is spent in Court, and therefore costs and resources by encouraging an early Guilty Plea
95
When are Sentence Indications Appropriate?
- When the Accused applies for the Indication - When there is sufficient information - When the Prosecution consents
96
The Victorian Court Hierarchy (From the Bottom to Top)
- Magistrates’ Court - County Court - Supreme Court (Trial Division) - Supreme Court (Court of Appeal) - High Court of Australia
97
Original Jurisdiction
Is the power of a Court to hear a case for the first time
98
Appellate Jurisdiction
Is the power of a Court to hear a case on Appeal
99
Criminal Jurisdiction
Is the power of a Court to hear Criminal matters
100
Jurisdiction
Is the Legal authority of a Court or other Dispute Resolution Bodies to decide the outcome of Legal cases
101
The Reasons for a Court Hierarchy
- Specialisation of Courts - Appeals - Administrative Convenience
102
Specialisation of Courts
Is when Courts specialise in an area and gain expertise and efficiency in that area. For example, less serious cases are heard in the Lower Courts, such as the Magistrates’ Court whilst the more serious cases are heard in the Higher Courts, such as the Supreme Court
103
Appeals
Appeals occur when a Party is unhappy with the outcome of their case. Grounds of Appeal can include a Question of Law, a Conviction or a Sanction. An Appellant may need to seek leave for their Appeal when Appealing to the Court of Appeal and their High Court
104
Original Jurisdiction of the Magistrates’ Court (List 2)
- Summary Offences - Indictable Offences Heard Summarily - Committal Proceedings - Bail Applications - Warrant Applications
105
Appellate Jurisdiction of the Magistrates’ Court
No Appellate Jurisdiction
106
Original Jurisdiction of the County Court
Hears Indictable Offences except Murder, Attempted Murder
107
Appellate Jurisdiction of the County Court
Hears Appeals from the Magistrates' Court on Conviction or Sentence (in limited circumstances
108
Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Trial Division)
Hears serious Indictable Offences including Murder and Attempted Murder
109
Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Trial Division)
Hears Appeals from the Magistrates' Court on Points of Law, Conviction or Sentence (in limited circumstances)
110
Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Court of Appeal)
No Original Jurisdiction
111
Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Court of Appeal)
Hears Appeals from the County Court or the Supreme Court (Trial Division)
112
The Judge
Is an impartial adjudicator who is appointed to hear Trials or Hearings
113
The Responsibilities of Judges in a Criminal Case (List 2)
- Managing the Trial through Case Management - Giving Directions to the Parties - Asking Witnesses questions - Determining the Verdict (If there is no Jury) - Determining the Remedy
114
The Jury
Criminal Trials in both the County and Supreme Courts require a Jury which consists of 12 randomly selected Jurors
115
The Responsibilities of the Jury in a Criminal Case (List 2)
- Being objective when partaking in a case - Listening to and remembering the evidence of the case (Jurors are allowed to take notes in a notebook) - Listening to the Judge’s direction and their summing up of a case - Delivering a verdict (Guilty or Not Guilty) - Keeping deliberations confidential
116
Responsibilities of the Parties in a Criminal Case (List 2)
- Giving opening and closing addresses - Making submissions about sentencing - Assisting the Judge in Jury matters
117
Legal Practitioners
There are two types of Legal Practitioners: Solicitors and Barristers. Solicitors prepare the case, drafts documents and develops evidence about the case whilst Barrister presents the case at a trial
118
Responsibilities of Legal Practitioners in a Criminal Case (List 2)
- Preparing documents and evidence about the case - Complying with their duty to the Court Presenting their client’s case in the best possible light - Not misleading the Court - Not presenting false Evidence
119
Sanctions
Are penalties that are imposed by a Court if an Accused is found Guilty or Pleads Guilty
120
Purposes of Sanctions
- Rehabilitation - Punishment - Deterrence - Denunciation - Protection
121
Purpose of Sanctions: Rehabilitation
Is designed to reform an Offender in order to prevent them from committing Offences in the future
122
Ways Courts Rehabilitate an Offender (List 2)
- Imposing a short Jail stay - A Sanction without Jail - A Sanction that will include treatment
123
Purpose of Sanctions: Punishment
Is designed to make the Offender 'pay' for their crime
124
Purpose of Sanctions: Deterrence
Is designed to discourage people from committing crimes
125
General Deterrence
Is aimed at the community in general and to deter them from committing similar Offences
126
Specific Deterrence
Is aimed at the Offender to prevent them from committing the same Offence again
127
Purpose of Sanctions: Denunciations
Is when there is disapproval of the Offender's behaviour. For example, the Court may give a harsher sentence for a particularly violent crime to demonstrate disapproval of the behaviour
128
Purpose of Sanctions: Protection
Is aimed to safeguard the community from the Offender. Prison is usually the Sanction
129
Types of Sanctions
- Fines - Community Correction Order (CCO) - Imprisonment
130
Fines
Are monetary payments that are ordered by a Court as a penalty for a Criminal Offence. These are expressed in Penalty Units. Fines are paid to the State of Victoria, not to the Victim
131
Purposes of Fines
- To punish the Offence - To Deter the Offender - Denunciation
132
The Ability of Fines to Achieve their Purposes
The more wealthy the Offender is, they Fines will act as only a small Punishment. Additionally, the highest Fine that is available in the Statute may not be very high. Finally, a small Fine may only act as Deterrence to the very poor
133
Community Correction Order (CCO)
Is a supervised sentence in the community that includes special conditions such as the the treatment of the Offender and unpaid community work for a certain number of hours
134
Conditions that are Attached to Every Community Correction Order (List 2)
- The Offender must not commit another offence punishable by imprisonment during the term of the order - The Offender must report to a specified community corrections centre within two working days of the order coming into force - The Offender must report to and receive visits from a Community Corrections Officer - The Offender must notify an Officer of a change of address - The Offender must not leave Victoria without permission - The Offender must comply with any directions of Community Corrections Officers
135
Sentencing Purposes of Community Corrections Orders
- To punish the Offender by limiting their freedom - To Rehabilitate them (when it includes treatment for Drugs or Alcohol) - May act as Specific Deterrence by the Offender having to do Community Work
136
Factors to Consider when Determining Whether a Community Corrections Order Achieve their Purpose (List 2)
- Whether there is a condition that will achieve the right purpose for the particular type of Offence - The most appropriate condition to be imposed, and whether the Court imposes that condition - Whether the Offender will comply with the conditions - Whether a CCO properly protects the community, where protection is a relevant purpose - Whether there is another or better Sanction that will achieve the necessary purposes
137
Imprisonment
Is a Sanction that involves removing the Offender from society for a period of time and placing them in Prison
138
Concurrent Sentence
Is when the Offender serves 2 or more Sentences at the same time
139
Cumulative Sentence
Is when the Offender serves 2 or more Sentences one after the other
140
When Cumulative Sentences Must be Given (List 2)
- When certain Indictable Offences such as Arson occur - Where Imprisonment is in default of payment of a Fine - When a Prisoner commits an Offence - When a person on Parole or Bail commits an Offence
141
Aggregate Sentence
Is an overall sentence that may be given out by a Judge, rather than separate Sentences for separate Offences. This Sentence cannot exceed the total that would have been imposed if separate sentences were received for each Charge
142
Indefinite Sentence
Is when an Offender has been Convicted by the County or Supreme Court for a serious Offence such as Murder. This can only be imposed if the Offender poses serious danger to the community
143
Purposes of Imprisonment
- Punishment - Losing freedom from society - Protection - Dangerous people are removed from society - Rehabilitation - Prisoners may undergo for certain Offences - Denunciation - A long Prison term demonstrates the disapproval of the Offence - Deterrence - Most people don't want to go to prison and acts as a way for a person to not want to go to Prison once released
144
Types of Sentencing Factors
- Aggravating Factors - Mitigating Factors - Guilty Pleas - Victim Impact Statements
145
Aggravating Factors
Are circumstances bout the offender or the offence that can increase the seriousness of the offences. If they are present, a higher sentence is normally imposed
146
Examples of Aggravating Factors (List 3)
- The use of violence, explosives or a weapon when committing an offence - Nature and gravity of offence (particularly cruel, unprovoked, pre-planned etc.) - Vulnerabilities of the victim (e.g. disability, young, old etc.) - Offender motivated my hatred or prejudice against a person or group of people - Offence committed in front of children - Breach of trust by the offender - Offence occurred while the offence is on a CCO or Bail
147
Mitigating Factors
Are Factors that relate to the Offender, the Victim or the Offence that reduce the seriousness of the Sentence
148
Examples of Mitigating Factors (List 2)
- The Offender was provoked by the Victim - The Offender showed remorse - The Offender has no previous Convictions - The Offender has cooperated with Police and made full Admissions - Injury or harm was minor - The Offender was young or had a Disability that made them not fully aware of the consequences - The Offender Plead Guilty early
149
Guilty Pleas
The Court must consider a Guilty Plea in Sentencing, particularly the timing of the plea (e.g. before or at the start of the Trial)
150
The Sentencing Act says that Guilty Pleas Must be Considered Because
- If an offender knows a Guilty plea is taken into account, it may encourage them to Plea Guilty rather than going to Trial - An early Guilty Plea avoids the time, expense and stress of a trial for all Parties that are involved, particularly the Victims and their families - The Court must state the amount of the 'Discount' for the Guilty Plea
151
Victim Impact Statements
Are statements that contain details of loss, injury and damage that was suffered as the result of the Offence. Medical and Psychological reports can also be attached. When sentencing, the Court must take into account the impact and circumstances of the Victim
152
Factors that Affect the Principles of Justice
- Costs - Time - Cultural Differences
153
Factors that Affect the Principles of Justice: Costs
The Costs of Legal Representation is the main Costs that the Accused will endure. If an accused is unable to afford a Lawyer, they may seek assistance from Victoria Legal Aid or a community legal centre. However, with limited funding, many don't qualify and will be forced to represent themselves
154
How Costs of Legal Representation does not Achieve Fairness
If the Accused cannot afford a Lawyer, they may have an unfair result due to their lacking of understanding of Court Procedures and the language that is used in Criminal Trials
155
How the Costs of Legal Representation does not Achieve Equality
If Parties cannot afford Legal Representation, they are at risk of not being treated Equally under the Law as they might be up against very skilled Lawyers who understand the Law and the rules of the Court. This places the unrepresented Accused at risk of not being able to perform at the same level as their opponent
156
How the Costs of Legal Representation does not Achieve Access
An Accused who cannot pay for Legal Representation may have trouble accessing the Courts, which may result in them having to Plead Guilty to a Crime that they may not have committed because they do not have the means or the ability to Defend their case
157
Factors that Affect the Principles of Justice: Time
There are delays in having a matter heard before the Courts as they have to complete a lot of paperwork. The use of Plea Negotiations help reduce these delays significantly by encouraging an early Plea, meaning a faster resolution of the Case
158
Factors that Affect the Principles of Justice: Cultural Factors
Cultural-based difficulties include difficulties that are faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people such as language barriers
159
Examples of Difficulties that are faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People (List 1)
- Understanding and responding to the English language | - They are forbidden to talk about certain things, such as the names of the dead
160
Recent Reforms to the Victorian Legal System
- The Expansion of the Koori Court | - The Implementation of Victim Support Dogs
161
Koori Court
Is a division of the Magistrates', County and Children's Courts and hear cases just regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people when it within their Jurisdiction, consent is given and there is a Guilty Plea
162
The Expansion of the Koori Court
A second Koori Court in Warnambool opened in 2019
163
Victim Support Dogs
Support dogs were trialed in 2017. The program officially began in 2019. The dogs are trained to support Vulnerable Witnesses in another location or in the Courtroom. Research has found that these dogs significantly reduced the stress of Witnesses, and have been found to need fewer breaks when giving Evidence. Permission must be sought from the Magistrate or Judge to allow the dog to be used. There are now 6 dogs used in the program
164
Recommended Criminal Reforms
- The Continued Expansion of the Koori Court | - Increased Funding for Legal Aid Centres and other Services
165
The Continued Expansion of the Koori Court
There are plans to expand the Koori County Court to all locations which have a Koori Magistrates' Court. The intention is to expand all Koori Court facilities widely throughout Victoria
166
Increased Funding for Legal Aid Centres and other Services
The Law Council of Australia conducted a report in 2018 into the state of Justice for Australians who experience disadvantage. One recommendation was to fund additional resources for Legal support services such as Legal Aid and Community Legal Centres. The minimum additional resources should be $390 million per year