Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Legal Studies Unit 3/4 > Unit 3 Outcome 2 > Flashcards

Unit 3 Outcome 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Plaintiff

A

party who brings the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Defendant

A

party who defends the allegations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Burden of Proof - Civil

A

Rests with the plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Standard of Proof - Civil

A

on the balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Representative Proceedings

A

When a group of people who have a claim based on a similar set of facts bring that claim to court in the name of one person (called a lead plaintiff)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Representative Proceedings - Criteria

A
  • 7 or more people claiming loss
  • Arising out of the same or related facts
  • Identical legal issue to be decided
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Representative Proceedings - Role of Lead Plaintiff (x2)

A

Launches the civil proceedings on behalf of the entire group
Resolution of the lead plaintiffs case determines the defendants liability for other members of the group taking action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Representative Proceedings - Benefits (x3)

A
  • Group members can share the cost of the proceeding
  • Saves time and resources within the legal system
  • Sometimes third party litigation funders can pay the upfront costs (in return for a percentage of damages awarded)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim

A

CLENS
- Cost
- Limitations of Actions
- Enforcement Issues
- Negotiation Options
- Scope of Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Negotiation Options

A

The consideration as to whether will the plaintiff and the defendant will be able to cooperate and resolve the dispute themselves rather than through the courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim - Costs (+ sources of costs x3)

A

The amount of money that has to be paid to resolve a legal dispute
The more complex the case -> greater the costs

Sources of Costs:
- Employing Legal Representation
- Disbursements - (fees)
- Adverse Cost Orders - (party/party costs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim - Limitation of Actions (+ purpose & examples)

A

Legal timeframe in which a plaintiff needs to bring their civil action.

Purpose - to ensure that cases are brought to court in a timely manner. prevents the defendant from having cases pending for an unlimited period of time

Examples:
- Defamation - 1 year
- Contract - 6 years
- Recover unpaid rent - 6 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim - Enforcement Issues (+ examples x3)

A

The ability to enforce the outcome of a legal proceeding

Examples:
- if the defendant is bankrupt or unemployed
- if the defendant is a company, may not have the assets to pay damages
- if the defendant is in prison or overseas, it will be difficult to enforce the payment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim - Scope of Liability

A

Refers to how many people are liable for harm caused to the plaintiff and how responsible that party/parties are.
Required to ensure the plaintiff takes action against all the entities that are liable for their injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim - Scope of Liability (Extent of Liability & impact on damages)

A

Considers whether possible defendants are wholly responsible, or only partially responsible.
Will determine the amount of damages each party will pay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim - Scope of Liability (Contributory Negligence)

A

When the plaintiff partly contributed to their loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Factors to Consider when initiating a civil claim - Scope of Liability - common parties

A
  • Insurance
  • Vicarious liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

CAV (+ enforcement powers)

A

Civil Affair Victoria - complaint body that encourages dispute resolution through conciliation. Free service

Enforcement: CAV lacks enforcement powers, therefore any agreement reached in CAV can only be enforced through the courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

CAV - Jurisdiction (x2)

A
  • A complaint by a consumer against a business
  • A complaint by a tenant against a landlord

for disputes under $40,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

CAV - Appropriate When (x3)

A
  • Dispute is within the jurisdiction
  • Parties have tried to negotiate themselves
  • both parties are willing to attend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

CAV - Not Appropriate When (x4)

A
  • Court system has already ruled on the matter
  • There is a better way to resolve the dispute
  • Parties have not tried to negotiate a resolution
  • All parties are not willing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

CAV - Purpose (x2)

A
  • provide information about consumer laws to the public
  • conciliate disputes arising under consumer laws
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

CAV - POJ Strengths (x2 Access, x2 Fairness, x1 Equality)

A

Access - Free - accessible method of dispute resolution
Access - Informal - doesn’t require legal representation/easy to understand
Fairness - Mutually acceptable solution - parties come to the conclusion themselves
Fairness - Timely - fast resolution time
Equality - Conciliator - promotes equality as it ensures that both parties have the ability to present their argument equally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

CAV - POJ Weaknesses (1x Access, 2x Fairness, 1x Equality)

A

Access - Limited Jurisdiction - many disputes cannot be resolved at CAV
Fairness - Cannot force parties to attend
Fairness - Cannot force agreement - risk that agreements reached in cav will not be followed
Equality - Not available to all parties - cav has limited jurisdiction & cannot compel attendance, meaning that access to cav is not equally spread

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

VCAT (+ makeup)

A

Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal, with limited power to hear types of Civil and Administrative Disputes. It is made up of the President (a supreme court justice), vice-presidents (county court judges) and members.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

VCAT - Purposes (x3)

A
  • Low Cost
  • Efficient
  • Accessible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

VCAT - Jurisdiction (x3 + things that cant be heard)

A

Claims under Residential Tenancies Act 1997 - Landlords & Tenants
Claims under the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 - Claims of unlawful discrimination
Claims under the Australian Consumer Law & Fair Trading Act 2010 - Claims by businesses and consumers
[Not Limited to]

Cant be heard:
- Employee/Employer Disputes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

VCAT - Binding & Outcomes

A

Decisions are binding
Outcomes may include orders for:
- Party to pay another party
- Party to perform an action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

VCAT - Appropriate When (x4)

A
  • The case falls inside their jurisdiction
  • Parties are unable to resolve a dispute any other way
  • Parties are happy to appeal only on questions of law
  • Parties prefer an informal dispute resolution process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

VCAT - Not Appropriate When (x6)

A
  • The case is outside their jurisdiction
  • Parties are willing to negotiate
  • Courts have already ruled on the matter
  • Parties want greater ability to appeal
  • Parties prefer legal representation to conduct their case
  • The claim is complex, or with a large financial dispute - better resolved with barristers and decided in court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

VCAT - POJ Strengths (3 access, 3 fairness, 1 equality)

A

Access - Low Cost
Access - Less Formal
Access - Supportive - VCAT provides information and support to parties when submitting and preparing for their hearing
Fairness - Binding
Fairness - Supportive Methods - VCAT encourages parties to resolve matters through mediation (gives parties more control - which is fair)
Fairness - Timely - most cases resolved quickly
Equality - Flexibility - role of the vcat member is flexible enough that they can ensure unrepresented parties have an equal opportunity to present their case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

VCAT - POJ Weaknesses (3 access, 4 fairness, 1 equality)

A

Access - Limited Jurisdiction - can only resolve matters inside its jurisdiction
Access - Increasing Cost - cost for vcat are increasing
Access - Delays - some lists have long delays
Fairness - No Juries - cannot use juries
Fairness - No legal representation - often requires self-representation, which can create issues for those who are uneducated, causing them to poorly present their case
Fairness - appeals - limited right to appeal
Fairness - enforcement - parties have to go court to enforce most vcat decisions
Equality - not available for all disputes - vcat has limited jurisdictions and cannot resolve large and complex disputes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Appealing to the High Court - Criteria (x2)

A
  • There is a question of law of public importance
  • There are differing opinions on the law and it requires clarification
34
Q

Administrative Convivence

A

Benefit derived from the organisation of cases according to how serious or complex the matters are

e.g. superior courts have more capacity to devote time and resources to long complex disputes without being clogged up by resolving minor disputes

35
Q

Court Hierarchy - POJ Strengths (1x access, 3x fairness, 2x equality)

A

Access - administrative convenience - parties have access to the correct court for their matter
Fairness - appeals are available to everyone
Fairness - consistent aim - although each court has difference processes, all provide public, independent process for resolving civil disputes
Fairness - minimising delay - administrative convenience minimises delays in courts from cases that don’t belong
Equality - right to appeal - both plaintiffs and defendants have a right to appeal
Equality - similar cases resolved in a like matter - each case heard in the appropriate court will be resolved in a similar way

36
Q

Court Hierarchy - POJ Weaknesses (1x access, 1x fairness, 1x equality)

A

Access - Cost of Appeals - limited in that the party wishing to seek an appeal must bear the cost of the fees
Fairness - Cost of Appeals - the party seeking the appeal must bear the cost, if they are unable, incorrect decisions may go uncorrected (which is unfair)
Equality - Cost of Appeals - an appeal may not be available to all parties if they cannot afford the cost

37
Q

Overarching Obligations (+ act & examples x4)

A

Parties in civil disputes must follow a set of overarching obligations.
Civil Procedure Act 2010

Examples:
- The duty to act honestly
- The duty to cooperate in the conduct of the proceedings
- The duty to use reasonable endeavours to resolve the dispute
- The duty to disclose the existence of critical documents at the earliest reasonable time

38
Q

Judicial powers of case management

A
  • Power to order dispute resolution
  • Power to give directions
39
Q

Judicial power of case management - power to order dispute resolution (+ act, definition & purpose)

A

Section 66(1) of the Civil Procedure Act 2010
‘A court may make an order referring a civil proceeding or part of a civil proceeding to appropriate dispute resolution’

The purpose of this power is to assist parties in coming to a fast and cost-effective resolution

40
Q

Judicial power of case management - power to order dispute resolution - POJ Strengths (2x access, 2x fairness, 1x equality)

A

Access - available to all parties - almost all parties have access to mediation at the pre-trial stage
Access - minimises cost - if the mediation is successful, costs are decreased
Fairness - saves parties time and money - if mediation is successful, parties saves time and money
Fairness - avoids trial - often results in disputes being resolved quickly, which shortens the time the plaintiff has to wait for a resolution
Equality - available to all parties

41
Q

Judicial power of case management - power to order dispute resolution - POJ Weaknesses (1x fairness)

A

Fairness - Not suitable for all disputes

42
Q

Judicial power of case management - power to give directions (+ act, definition & purpose)

A

Section 47 - Civil Procedure Act 2010
‘Court may give any direction or make any order it considers appropriate’

Purpose: to give judges the ability to maintain control of the proceedings

43
Q

Judicial power of case management - power to give directions (examples x4)

A
  • identify issues in dispute - Instructions to identify the issues in dispute (pretrial conferences)
  • timetables - set timetables to ensure that the pre-trial procedures move fast
  • order - order of witnesses
  • presentation - directing which evidence should be given orally, and which evidence should be presented in a written form
44
Q

Judicial power of case management - power to give directions (failure to comply x4)

A
  • Dismissing - the plaintiffs claim
  • Dismissing - the defendants defence
  • Direct - one party to pay all/part of the other parties costs
  • Reject - any evidence the plaintiff/defendant wishes to present to the court
45
Q

Judicial power of case management - power to give directions - POJ Strengths (1x access, 2x fairness, 1x equality)

A
  • Access - saves court time and resources
  • Fairness - timely - parties may have their issue resolved quickly
  • Fairness - parties are aware of the case against them - judges have the power to order the disclosure of all documents - allows them to prepare an informed defence.
  • Equality - applies to all cases - judges have broad powers in all cases
46
Q

Methods used to resolve civil disputes

A

Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration

47
Q

Mediation (+ binding)

A

Cooperative, non-judicial dispute resolution process.
Involves a third-party (mediator) - who encourages two parties to communicate (doesn’t provide solutions), which ensures the parties voluntarily come to a resolution.

Resolution not binding unless a deed of settlement is signed

48
Q

Mediation - Not Appropriate When (x4)

A
  • Parties are highly emotional, as negotiation becomes more difficult
  • Parties are unwilling to discuss issues
  • History of violence or threats
  • There is a power imbalance
49
Q

Mediation - Appropriate When (x4)

A
  • Continuing relationship needs top be maintained
  • Parties are willing to discuss issues
  • There is admission of responsibility
  • Parties prefer privacy and confidentiality
50
Q

Mediation - use in resolve disputes

A

Courts - part of the judges powers
VCAT - used before formal hearings

51
Q

Mediation - POJ Strengths (3x access, 1x fairness, 2x equality)

A

Access - Low Cost - lower cost than a trial
Access - Informal - conducted in a supportive, non-adversarial manner
Access - Private - mediation process is not held in the public record
Fairness - Party Control - gives the parties the ability to control the outcome, which is fair
Equality - no party is disadvantaged - mediator ensures that all parties are included
Equality - legal representation is equal - mediator will only allow legal representation if both parties have a lawyer

52
Q

Mediation - POJ Weaknesses (1x fairness, 1x equality)

A

Fairness - some disputes may not be able to find a resolution through mediation
Equality - language barriers - parties without English skills will struggle to engage in mediation

53
Q

Conciliation

A

Cooperative, non-judicial dispute resolution process
Involves a third party (conciliator) - has specialist knowledge, encourages the two parties to communicate, can offer suggestions and solutions, which allows the parties to come to a conclusion themselves

Resolution not binding unless a deed of settlement is signed

54
Q

Conciliation - use in resolving disputes

A

Courts - commonly used in the family court, otherwise, sometimes used as part of the judges power to order dispute resolution
VCAT - used in pre-hearing compulsory conferences
CAV - preferred method of dispute resolution

55
Q

Conciliation - Appropriate When (x4)

A
  • There is a continuing relationship
  • Parties are willing to discuss issues
  • There is admission of responsibility
  • Parties prefer privacy and confidentiality
56
Q

Conciliation - Not Appropriate When (x4)

A
  • Parties are highly emotional
  • Parties are unwilling to discuss issues
  • There is a history of violence or threats
  • There is a power imbalance
57
Q

Conciliation - POJ Strengths (3x access, 1x fairness, 2x equality)

A

Access - Low Cost - lower cost than a trial
Access - Informal - conducted in a supportive, non-adversarial manner
Access - Private - mediation process is not held in the public record
Fairness - Party Control - gives the parties the ability to control the outcome, which is fair
Equality - no party is disadvantaged - conciliator ensures that all parties are included
Equality - legal representation is equal - mediator will only allow legal representation if both parties have a lawyer

58
Q

Conciliation - POJ Weaknesses (1x fairness, 1x equality)

A

Fairness - failure - some disputes may not be able to find a resolution through mediation
Equality - language barriers - parties without English skills will struggle to engage in mediation

59
Q

Arbitration

A

Non-judicial dispute resolution process.
Involves a third party (Arbitrator) who listens to parties present evidence, and makes a binding decision

60
Q

Arbitration - how the hearings are conducted

A

Less formal than a trial, without rules of evidence

61
Q

Arbitration - use in resolving disputes

A

Contracts - commonly used as aa way to resolve disputes in the contract
Court - sometimes used as part of the judges ‘power to order dispute resolution’’
Court - used by the magistrates court for claims of less than $10,000 dollars

62
Q

Purposes of Remedies

A

to return the plaintiff to the position they were in prior to the injury being caused by the defendant

63
Q

Purposes of Damages

A

Monetary compensation

64
Q

Purposes of Damages (+ 4 types)

A

Monetary compensation

Compensatory Damages - reimburse for injury or harm suffered as a result of negligent actions and to restore the plaintiff, as far as possible, to the position the plaintiff was in prior to the breach of rights
- Specific - compensating a specific amount
- General - compensating things that do not have a precise value
- Aggravated - compensation for humiliation and insult
Exemplary Damages - used to punish the defendant - large monetary value
Nominal Damages - small amount to show the defendant was legally right - $1
Contemptuous Damages - awarded in recognition of a right, but where the plaintiff didn’t really deserve to be paid damages. Court considers the case should not have been brought to court

65
Q

Compensatory Damages (types, purpose, ability to achieve purpose)

A

Types:
- Specific - have a precise value and are easily quantifiable
- General - compensation for things that do not have a precise value and are not easily quantifiable
- Aggravated - compensation for humiliation and insult

Purpose: Reimburse for injury or harm suffered as a result of negligent actions and to restore the plaintiff, as far as possible, to the position the plaintiff was in prior to the breach of rights

Ability to achieve purpose:
- Specific -> yes, can compensate for particular harms that can be precisely calculated
- General -> yes to a degree -> can compensate for potential loss of income
no -> impossible to precisely calculate an amount of money that will compensate for physical/physiological pain
no -> no amount of money can reverse it either

66
Q

Injunctions

A

Court orders compelling a party to do/not-do something

67
Q

Purpose of Injunctions

A
  • Preventing harm to the plaintiff
  • Restoring the plaintiff to their original position
68
Q

Types of Injunctions (type, length)

A

Mandatory - force the parties to do something
Restrictive - prevent the parties from doing something

Interlocutory - temporary (usually until the end of the case)
Perpetual - permanent

69
Q

Pre-Trial Procedures

A

Procedures that occur prior to the commencement of a trial, to setup the case for a just and fair outcome

70
Q

Pre-Trial Procedures - purposes (x3)

A
  • For parties to notify their intention to sue/defend the case
  • ensuring that all parties are aware of the case/evidence against them
  • Encourage an early response to the dispute
71
Q

Pleadings

A

Series of documents lodged in court that outlines each parties claim

72
Q

Writ

A

Informs the court and the defendant that they are being sued

73
Q

Statement of Claim

A

document that the plaintiff files in court, which outlines the nature of their claim, the material facts, and the remedy sought

74
Q

Statement of Defence

A

document that the defence files in court, which outlines how the accused plans to defend the claim made by the plaintiff

75
Q

Discovery

A

Parties establish the facts of the case and the evidence that will be used to prove those facts.
Parties seek evidence from opposing parties

76
Q

Types of Evidence

A

Lay Evidence - evidence that is provided by ordinary people
Expert Evidence - evidence that is provided by people with expertise in the field of dispute

77
Q

Impact of Cost on the Civil Justice System (x6 Access, x1 fairness, x1 equality)

A

Access - Cost of proceedings - limit launching a claim
Access - Costs may prevent a defendant fighting a claim
Access - Cost of VCAT - the high costs on some VCAT lists may discourage individuals from pursuing particular types of claims
Access - Higher costs for businesses - the higher costs for businesses at VCAT may discourage some small businesses from initiating proceedings
Access - Cost of using a jury - access to a jury may be discouraged due to the cost
Access - Cost of appeals - high costs of filing an appeal (and the cost of lawyers) may discourage parties from filing an appeal.

Fairness - Unequal Legal representation

Equality - Costs - if some injured parties cannot start proceedings (but others can) due to costs associated, its not equal

78
Q

Time Delays are undesirable because x3

A
  • Stressful on all parties
  • Memories fade over time, which can reduce the accuracy of evidence presented orally
  • Injured party may have their suffering compounded as a result of the delay
79
Q

Impact of Time on the Civil Justice System (x2 Access, x2 fairness, x2 equality)

A

Access - Delays may deter injured parties from initiating a claim - the delays in the justice system may discourage injured parties from initiating legal action in the first place
Access - Pre-trial procedures - longer pretrial procedures go for -> more money spent on legal representation

Fairness - Delays exacerbate the stress of a trial - delays compound the injury to the party which is unfair
Fairness - Unreliable evidence - if delays cause evidence to be lost, it may lead to incorrect and unjust outcomes, which is fair

Equality - Inconsistent dispute resolution times - some injured persons see their disputes resolved very quickly, whereas others face significant delays, this is unequal
Equality - Judicial powers of case management - judges in the courts may use their powers of case management differently, creating a risk for unequal treatments in the court

80
Q

Accessibility Issues in the Civil Justice System (x4)

A
  • Complex organization of courts - have to decide what court to seek a remedy (can be hard for migrants, limited education, unable to afford representation)
  • Complex procedures used - (can be hard for migrants, limited education, unable to afford representation)
  • Locations - difficult for those in Regional Victoria
  • VCAT’s self representation - can allow accessibility, however can be hard for migrants, limited education, unable to afford representation
81
Q

Impact of Accessibility on the Civil Justice System (x2 Access, x1 fairness, x1 equality)

A

Access - Lack of Understanding - some individuals may be participants in civil justice cases as a plaintiff, but not understand the legal processes they are participating in, undermining access to justice. -> leads to be unwilling to bring a case
Access - Self representation - fear of self representation may prevent some from starting proceedings in VCAT

Fairness - Disadvantaged parties - self-represented parties in VCAT and the courts may not be able to present their case in its best light (due to lack of English, education etc) and thus the outcome may not be fair

Equality - Certain groups may be discouraged from approaching the civil justice system - barriers may prevent injured individuals with a right to a remedy from pursuing a case due to their personal characteristics, thus undermining equality

Legal Studies Unit 3/4 (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions