Unit 3.5 The Government, Self Help & Charity 1847-80 Flashcards
(35 cards)
Who started the rumour surrounding the Andover Workhouse?
The Chartists - men who wanted the right to vote - they created 20 other stories
When was the Andover Poor Law Union created? How many Guardians was it overseen by?
1835 - overseen by 36 Guardians
Info about the Andover Union Workhouse?
-used as a model of post-1834 Poor Law administration, it was praised in the Poor Law Commissions annual reports
-union abolished all outdoor relief and had the strictest regulations such as the strictest dietary regulation in their workhouse
-1836 - Colin M’Dougal and his wife became master and matron of the Andover workhouse - very trusted so inspections were infrequent
-rumours circulated that the conditions of the workhouse were too bad - beyond less eligibility
What was the Andover Workhouse Scandal?
When rumours circulated in 1845 that the master and matron of the Andover workhouse were treating the paupers very poorly, this was investigated and was proven to be true
Some of the mistreatment included not feeding them, being sexually assaulted by the master and his son, and having to crush bones all day long
What year were the matron and master of the Andover workhouse appointed? Names?
1837 - Colin M’Dougal and his wife
How did the master and the matron of the Andover Workhouse treat inmates?
-The master was an ex sergeant major - fought at Waterloo in 1815, his wife was a ‘violent lady’ according to the Guardians
-The workhouse was ran like a penal colony, keeping expenditure and food rations to a minimum which was approved by the guardians
-Inmates ate with their fingers, denied extra food and drink that was provided elsewhere at Christmas
-Any man who tried to talk to his wife at mealtime was put into a refractory cell
-Crushing bones into fertiliser was the main job done by men - it was strenuous
What did rumours suggest was happening in the workhouse? When?
-1845 - rumours spread that men in the workhouse bone yard were so hungry that they ate tiny scrapes of marrow and gristle attached to old bones
-fighting almost broke out when a succulent bone came their way
What action did one of the Guardians take? Who was it?
-Guardian Hugh Mundy was concerned so raised the issue at a board meeting
-Other guardians weren’t so concerned but they did suspend bone crushing during hot weather
-He took the matter to the local MP, Thomas Wakeley who in August 1845, asked a question in parliament concerning the paupers of Andover who were quarrelling about bones and gnawed at meat
-Home Secretary promised to instigate an enquiry
Who was the assistant poor law commissioner responsible for Andover Union?
Henry Parker
What did the Assistant Commissioner for the Andover Union do? Why were his action unpopular?
-Henry Parker was dispatched to establish facts of matter
-He said that the allegations were true, he discovered inmates regularly given less than their due ration of bread
-The investigation results in M’Dougal resigning as master on the 29th September
-M’Dougal was to be replaced by the unemployed former master of the Oxford workhouse but the man was dismissed for misconduct so wasnt chosen to be his replacement
-Parker was forced to resign by the poor law commissioners in October - he was the scapegoat for the affair, they faced pressure from parliament, press and public
What were the results of the Andover Committees investigation?
-November 1845 - the commissioners acknowledge the outcry against bone crushing by forbidding it
-March 1846 - Parliament select committee was set up to enquire into the administration of the Andover union
-Andover Commitee began to work and they revealed what witnesses said
-Such as, bone crushing was heavy work and gory, it smelt bad, broke backs, blistered hands and boys of eight or ten were set to it
-It came out that M’Dougal seduced young women inmates, so did his son
-Came out that they made Hannah Joyce carry her 5 month old dead babies coffin for a mile for an unceremonious burial
What happened to the Poor Law Commission because of the Andover Workhouse scandal?
-The poor law board was created after the select committees report was published in two volumes in 1846
-It replaced the poor law commission and was more accountable to parliament
-Poor Law Board oversaw the parliament not the workhouse like the commission did
What was the Poor Law Board?
-1847 - created as a replacement for the Poor Law Commission by the government
-It aimed to overhaul the weaknesses of the Poor Law Commission and increased government involvement
-Several Cabinet members who sat on the board were ex officio, the president of the board was an MP - had experience but had a lot of work to do so couldn’t fully focus on the poor law
-Those who were responsible for the Poor Law administration were answerable to Parliament and to the public - established trust
-George Nicholls who was a Poor Law Commissioner was Secretary to the Board and most assistant commissioners stayed on - there wasnt a full reform
-Numbers of assistant commissioners rose from 9 to 13 which was important as they were understaffed beforehand
Ex-officio
A member of a body (board, committee, council etc.) who hold another office
When was the Poor Law Board created?
1847
Why was the Poor Law Board successful?
-1850s - several Unions set up public dispensaries which dispensed medicines to paupers, 1852 - a poor person who could not pay for medical treatment or prescribed medicines automatically qualified for relief
-The connections between medicine and less eligibility were beginning to be broken
-The Forster’s Education Act 1870 set up Board schools - funded and managed by the Poor Law Board in areas where there were insufficient voluntary church schools
-Poor Law Schools Act - Unions could work together to provide district schools
-Instigated the setting up of pauper hospitals - separate from the Workhouse
-Union Chargeability Act in 1866 - financial burden on the Union as a whole, rather than each individual parish
-Poor Law Loans Act 1871, allowed guardians to borrow money from the Public Work Commission
Why was the Poor Law Board a failure?
-popularity of outdoor relief continued to increase - cheaper in some cases e.g. in London in 1862 - against the basic principle of the Poor Law Amendment Act 1834
-1852 - attempted to issue a general order to forbid outdoor relief for the able bodied but it failed
-The change and development in Poor Law medical services happened not in response to any conscious and specific plan or ideology on behalf of the Board, but in response to need and public opinion
-Guardians, even with the offer of loans, were committed to keeping the spending on paupers as low as possible - claimed they couldn’t afford to build separate accommodation and the board did nothing to stop this
-The Union Chargeability Act still failed to create a uniform system and placed a financial burden on the union as a whole - unpopular and difficult to impose
How long did the Poor Law Board last?
1847-71
What was the Poor Law Board replaced by? When?
1871 - Poor Law Board replaced by Local Government Boards
Why was the Poor Law Board replaced?
-By the 1870s, the government were becoming more and more aware, and concerned with, the welfare of the people
-New public health legislation relied increasingly on local authorities
-Therefore it made sense to ensure the Poor Law was also given to local authorities
-Therefore, in 1871, the Poor Law Board was replaced by the Local Government Board
What did Local Government Boards do?
-Supported deterring able-bodied paupers from claiming relief.
-Authorised Boards of Guardians to help groups of paupers emigrate.
-Condemned outdoor relief. (However, the greatest number of paupers were still being relieved outside the workhouse)
What are the 3 groups that were responsible for poverty from 1847-1880?
- Charity Organisation Society
- The Coop
- Friendly societies & Trade Unions
What were the successes of the charity organisation society (COS)?
-Founded in 1869 - aims of coordinating the work of the many private charities
-Charities could coordinate efforts and ensure charitable relief was appropriately given
-Benefits selected for reliefs had to be moral and material to reform behaviour and put food on the table
-Permanent benefit on the recipient
-Local branches were set up all over the country
-Got publicity and used propaganda
-Intellectuals supporters and their views were listened in official circles
-1880 - established practices and procedures it used when visiting poor families collecting info in a systematic way - basis of social work
What were the failures of the charity organisation society (COS)?
-Members of the COS were opposed to giving freely as they believed relief was a gift not a right - should be temporary
-Should only be given to the deserving poor who would be offered limited charity to help them get back on their feet by using casework - many those who applied were turned down
-Manchester District Provident Society didn’t coordinate all the charities in the area - branches worked in an autonomous way, not coordinated and no national organisation
-Provincial branches often failed to recruit sufficient volunteers or raise enough funds
-Rigorous investigative methods resented by the poor
-Charities were alienated and preferred to raise their own funds
-Guardians had a strained relationships with their local COS branches as they interfered with the guardians ways of distributing relief