Unit 7: Elections & Referendums Flashcards
(70 cards)
What are the types of elections in the UK?
-General elections
-Elections to the devolved assemblies
-Local elections
-By-elections
-Police and crime commissioners
-London assembly
Who is not elected in the UK?
-The head of state
-The House of Lords
-The judiciary
-Civil service
What is First Past the Post (FPTP)?
-used to elect 650 MPs to the House of Commons who represent views of the local area and of their party
-one MP candidate per party per constituency
-Constituency boundaries are determined by an independent commission which reviews the size of the electorate in each constituency every 8-12 years
-In 2016, the cons announced plans to reduce the number of MPs from 650 to 600
-A candidate must have a plurality of votes to win - 1 more than the second placed candidate
What do parties require in the commons?
-they require a plurality to win: they must have 1 more seat than the second placed party - must have 326 seats to have a majority (majority government) - most common
-If a party does not receive 326 seats (hung parliament) another party can be invited to make up the required seats - coalition government
-OR the PM can choose to govern without a majority (minority government) - would need the support of opposing parties to pass legislation
How competitive are seats in elections? Trends in marginal seats?
-there are safe seats and marginal seats
-In marginal seats, there tends to be a higher turnout in an attempt to swing the result
What does FPTP tend to do? Example? What type of party system does FPTP favour?
-tends to exaggerate the performance of the most popular party - winner’s bonus or landslide effect e.g. 2024 - Labour have over 400 seats but only won 3 million more votes than conservatives even though they only got just over 120 seats
-As parliament is made up the ‘majority’ and the ‘opposition’, FPTP favours a 2 party system - these are major parties that have nationwide support
What can FPTP do to voters? How does this impact smaller parties?
-FPTP system does not directly translate votes to seats - can result in ‘tactical voting’ in some areas. eg. Labour benefitted from anti-Conservative tactical voting between 1997-2005 and 2024
-smaller parties are often not voted for as the public believe that their vote is a ‘wasted vote’ - very difficult to win seats in a FPTP system - eg. UKIP won only 1 seat in 2015, then 0 in 2017 and 2019 BUT reform won 5 seats in first proper election competed
Can FPTP be somewhat beneficial to small parties? How can size of constituencies impact results?
-the system does benefit some smaller parties. eg. SNP won only 50% of the vote but 95% of the seats in Scotland in 2015. The system is therefore inconsistent in some respects.
-Differences in constituency size can lead to bias. eg. The electorate in constituencies won by Labour in 2015 was on average 3850 lower than those won by Conservatives.
Advantages of FPTP?
-Voting is simple – 1 ballot paper only - easy to understand and operate
-Bias is addressed – eg. Constituency areas are frequently re-configured.
-Clear outcome – most elections produce a clear winner.
-Strong and stable governments – Rarely are coalitions or minority governments formed - single party goes exercise control over legislative process - able to fulfil mandate
-Keeps out extremist parties – as small parties find it difficult to be represented.
-Responsible gov - governing party held to account for its record and the opposition is too - mandate obliges winning party to put proposals into effect
Disadvantages of FPTP?
-Disproportional outcomes – such as ‘winner’s bonus’ where main party gets more seats than their vote merits e.g. 1974 where avour won more seats but cons won more votes. Third parties tend to also be under- represented.
-Electoral ‘deserts’ – These are parts of the country where a party has little or no representation – for example, if they have not won any of the constituency seats in that area, yet dominate in Westminster e.g. cons won 34% of vote in ne England in 2018 but 10% of seats - cons are better in south and rural and labour does better un north and wales - 2017 labour won south seats
-Wasted votes - dont help elect MP - any vote for losing candidate (50% in 2015) or vote for winning candidate that wasn’t required for them to win (24% in 2015)
-Limited choice – Only 1 MP per party. Or sage seats If people don’t like the choice, this could result in tactical voting where you dont vote for first choice to prevent a party you dont like from winning e.g. 2024 Woking and nationally.
-FPTP contributes to divisive politics – the 2 main political parties try to directly oppose one another, even though they might not need to/want to (adversarial politics)
What are the 4 types of electoral systems?
- FPTP
- Supplementary Vote - SV
- Single Transferrable Vote - STV
- Additional Member System - AMS
Features of SV? Examples?
-Majoritarian
-Small and single member constituencies
-Two votes with a first choice and a second choice but you vote for a single candidate
-If a candidate gains 51% of votes, they’re elected, if no one does, then all the candidates are eliminated and the second choice of votes are redistributed to the top two candidates if they were the second choice
London Mayor and Police and Crime Commissioners
Strengths of SV? Weaknesses?
-More likely that candidate has majority support
-More choice - increased participation
-More scope for smaller parties - increased participation
-Retains a strong MP - constituency link
-Winning candidate may not have gotten 50% of vote
-May force voters to vote for someone they don’t want to
-Second place candidate could win
-May not benefit smaller parties - still promotes two party system
-Wasted vote still present
Features of STV? Examples?
-Proportional
-Large multi member system
-As many votes as there is candidates
-Quota of seats present, if you reach it, youre elected and the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and votes relocated based on ranking until the quota is reached and all seats are filled
Northern Ireland and Scottish Local Election
Strengths of STV? Weaknesses?
-Most proportional system in all of UK
-Ensures no wasted vote
-Final result creates a government backed by 50% of electorate
-Voters have choice
-Equal value of voters
-Complicated - spoilt ballots
-Produces multi party govs which may be unstable
-Takes a while to get a result
-Fifth or sixth choices are not really votes
Features of AMS? Examples?
-Hybrid of FPTP and closed party list
-Two candidates
-Vote for a single candidate and a party
-Candidate votes are FPTP then, based on results of party list, party seats are topped up from a list of candidates
Scottish Parl and Welsh Parl
Strengths of AMS? Weaknesses?
-MP-constituency link
-Proportional representation
-Greater choice and split of votes
-Party list element allows parties to increase diversity
-Eliminates winners bonus
-Single party gov possible
-Can split votes
-2 categories of representation
-Proportionality diminished by low levels of additional members
-Voters usually vote same way
-Parties have little control over who comes where on part list
-Difficult for a strong gov to form
-Means one party usually dominates
Long terms factors which influence voters behaviour?
- Region/geography
- Ethnicity
- Age
- Class
- Gender
How does region/geography influence voter behaviour?
-rural areas and the south are usually conservative
-urban areas like London and the north are held by labour as well as wales
-regional parties dominate in Scotland and NI has its own system
-in 2024, labour gained more seats in the south
How does ethnicity influence voter behaviour?
-BAME groups more likely to vote labour than conservative
-white voters are the opposite was around
-HOWEVER in 2024, labour has a 7 pt lead in votes from whites in comparison to cons, which chnaged from the 2019 GE where cons were 19 pt ahead
How does age influence voter behaviour?
-2017, age was most important factor in the election where the young were more likely to vote labour than those over 47 who voted conservative
-2016, EU referendum where 18-34 year olds voted remain where over 55s voted leave
-turnout increases with age with 57% of 18-19 year olds voting in 2017 general election compared to 84% of those aged 70+
How does class influence voter behaviour?
-class was traditionally the biggest factor with the working class voting labour and cons being supported by middle class
-since the 80s and class dealignment has meant class is less importnat
-middle class voters more likely to vote remain in 2016 EU referendum than working class
-in 2024 election both the middle classes and the lower classes majority voted labour
How does gender influence voter behaviour?
-women typically support parties that favour support for public services like NHS
-mainly women voted remain and they are also more likely to turn out over men
-in 2024, more women voted labour, conservative and Lib Dem in comparison to men but Labour was by a small margin and more men overwhelmingly voted Reform UK
3 theories of voter choice?
- Rational choice theory
- Issue voting
- Valance issues