Unit I - Module 2 Cost Estimating Techniques Flashcards
(36 cards)
Which of the following estimating techniques relies heavily on the subjective opinion of an individual?
A. Parametric
B. Extrapolation from Actuals
C. Expert Opinion
D. Analogy
E. Build-Up
F. None of the Above
G. All of the Above
C. Expert Opinion
Parametric estimates and estimates based on Analogy use data from completed historical programs to
project future costs.
Extrapolation from Actuals is also data-based, though the data used may be from
either complete or incomplete units.
A BuildiUp estimates at the lowest possible level, and uses industrial engineering techniques, such as time standards, to develop an estimate at a low level.
Expert Opinion, on the other hand, relies on the subject opinion of the individual expert.
In fact, Expert Opinion is not generally accepted as a valid technique in and or itself, but rather the estimator’s judgment and expertise is used in applying one of the other methods.
In estimating the cost of a “follow-on” contract for a program that has been in existence for an extended period of time for which the actual costs incurred to date on the specific program are readily available, what would be the preferred estimating methodology?
A. Expert Opinion
B. Extrapolation from Actuals
C. Analogy
D. Parametric
E. Build-Up
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above
B. Extrapolation from Actuals
Extrapolation from Actuals uses actuals from past or current items to predict future costs for the same item.
Extrapolation from Actuals is an umbrella term covering several estimating techniques, including learning curve and earned value management (EVM) estimates at complete (EACs), will be explored in subsequent modules.
Which of the following estimating techniques is based upon knowledge of the cost of a similar item and uses adjustment factors for the complexity, technical, or physical differences between the items?
A. Analogy
B. Expert Opinion
C. Extrapolation from Actuals
D. Parametric
E. Build-Up
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above
A. Analogy
A cost estimating analogy is an attempt to estimate costs by drawing a comparison between the item in question and a similar (or analogous) item.
An analogy can be done at the system, subsystem, or component level. Multiple analogies can be used at the lower WBS levels to build up to a higher level
estimate.
Two systems are rarely identical, and adjustments must be made to account for the differences between the old item and the new item. These adjustments are based on complexity, technical, or physical differences between the two items.
One difference between estimating parametrically and estimating with an analogy is that in parametric estimating, the analyst has multiple similar systems used to create a Cost Estimating Relationship, where in an analogy only one historical data point is used.
Top-level technical data, such as the mass properties of an item, would most likely be used to support which estimating technique?
A. Build-Up
B. Parametric
C. Extrapolation From Actuals
D. Analogy
E. Expert Opinion
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above
B. Parametric
The parametric costing technique is a mathematical relationship between certain characteristics (such as weight, thrust, or power) as one or more independent variables of a system and the
system’s cost as a dependent variable.
If the data were at a lower level, such as a detailed mass properties report, that would more likely support the Build-Up technique.
A quantitative methodology for estimating the touch labor of manufacturing a product using labor standards is most likely to be part of the application of which of the following costing techniques?
A. Expert Opinion
B. Extrapolation From Actuals
C. Build-Up
D. Analogy
E. Parametric
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above
C. Build-Up
The Build-Up method builds estimates for higher-level cost elements by summing or “rolling up” detailed estimates for lower-level cost elements.
A build-up is characterized by estimating at the lowest definable level at which data exist. Standards Development is the cornerstone of this technique.
The standards generally reflect an optimal production environment. They capture how long it takes to perform particular task, based on time and motion studies done in controlled environments.
True or False. A cost analyst that has the labor standards for manufacturing a landing gear bracket for the B-2 Bomber has enough information to determine the total cost of the landing gear bracket.
False
False. Manufacturing a landing gear bracket requires inputs beyond touch labor.
Material costs, for example, must also be included. On the labor side, support labor, ancillary labor, and indirects (overhead) must be considered (see Module 11 Manufacturing Cost Estimating for more
detail on these). This demonstrates one of the pitfalls of build-up estimating: omissions are likely.
It is very difficult to anticipate all costs beforehand. It is useful to cross-check a build up estimate with another estimating technique, like an analogy.
When using a weight-based parametric estimating technique, it is necessary to know the material type being used (e.g., steel or composites).
True or False.
True
The variables used in the Cost Estimating Relationship (CER) developed using a parametric technique must either be constant or the data must be normalized such that differences do no effect the estimate.
The cost-per-pound of Steel vs. Composite Material is not equal. A weight-based parametric estimating technique is influenced by the type of material, and this variable must be known.
Which of the following is a major shortcoming of using expert opinion as an estimating methodology?
A. It relies heavily on performance data
B. It takes a purely quantitative approach to estimating
C. Actual cost data is readily available
D. The opinion of an individual is not refutable
E. The estimate is always understated
F. It is likely that other experts exist with differing opinions
G. None of the Above
F. It is likely that other experts exist with differing opinions
Expert opinion is subjective. A different expert will likely have a different, subjective, opinion.
Because of this, without support from another, objective, estimating methodology, expert opinion
has little credibility.
A relationship between power (in kilowatts) and cost (in thousands of dollars) is an example of which methodology?
A. Extrapolation from Actuals
B. Expert Opinion
C. Analogy
D. Build-Up
E. SWAG Estimating
F. Atmospheric Extraction
G. Parametric
G. Parametric
The parametric costing technique is a mathematical relationship between certain characteristics (such as weight, thrust, or power) as one or more independent variables of a system and the
system’s cost as a dependent variable.
The stated relationship between kilowatts and cost is a parametric relationship.
Which methodology would be best to use when estimating the cost of the 20th lot of F/A - 18 C/D containing units 950 through 980 when complete historical costs are available for units 1 through 949?
A. Extrapolation From Actuals
B. Parametric
C. SWAG Estimating
D. Atmospheric Extraction
E. Analogy
F. Expert Opinion
G. Industrial Engineering
A. Extrapolation From Actuals
Extrapolation from actuals is best suited for follow–on units/lots when you have existing datafrom current and past production lots.
N.b., this assumes little change in the product design or manufacturing process from the previous units. If large changes exist, careful adjustments may have to be made or some other method chosen.
When developing a cost estimate, you should always use the same costing technique for every element.
True / False
False
False. Some techniques may be better suited than others for certain elements in the estimate.
You must develop a cost estimate for the structure subsystem of a new communications satellite, COM2. The new satellite is similar to COM1, a communications satellite your company recently built. Through discussion with the structural engineers, you collected the data to the right. What should the estimated cost of the structure subsytem be?
A. $4 M
B. $5 M
C. $6.25 M
D. $10 M
E. None of the Above
C. $6.25 M
The data is recent, and the subsystem similar, so the analogous data does not need to be normalized
further. N.b., this is a cartoon example.
Defense of this cost estimate would require more in-depthinformation regarding, amongst other things, what constitutes “similar” and “recent.”
$5M * (250 kg/200 kg)= $6.25 M
or
$5M / 200 kg = 0.025 $M/kg
0.025 $M/kg * 250 kg = $6.25 M
If a parametric Cost Estimating Relationship (CER) is given by the equation y = a + bx, which of the following statements is true?
I. x is the independent variable.
II. y usually represents cost.
III. When x increases by 1, y increases by a.
A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II only
E. I and III only
F. II and III only
G. I, II, and III
D. I and II only
Statements I and II are true: x is the independent variable in the equation and, in a CER, y usually represents costs. Statement III is incorrect. The correct statement is: when x increases by 1, y
increases by b, since b is the slope.
If you remember “rise over run,” you’ll see that the line goes up b units as it goes over 1 unit.
Which of the following pairs are the correct terms for the two main ways to structure a cost estimate?
A. Tops Down / Bottoms Up
B. Top Down/ Bottoms Up
C. Tops Down / Bottom Up
D. Top Down / Bottom Up
D. Top Down / Bottom Up
Top Down is generally associated with the use of Parametrics or Analogy; Bottom Up involves working from information at the lowest level to develop an estimate for an entire system.
When referencing either, remember they are both correctly referenced in the singular.
The standard for an item is 800 touch labor hours, and the documented variance factor is 18%. The corresponding indirect labor factor is 60%. What are the estimated touch labor hours for this item?
A. 800
B. 944
C. 1280
D. 1510.4
B. 944
Apply variance to touch labor hours:
800*1.18= 944 hours
Do not add in the additional 60% because that is indirect and the questions asks for touch labor (direct)
True or False. A Cross-Check should result in exactly the same estimate as the original estimate.
False
False. A Cross-Check should be a similar number, of at least the same order of magnitude, but it will likely not be exactly the same as the original estimate. In fact, a cross check that results in exactly the same estimate as the original is suspicious.
Which of the following estimating techniques is an objective method of estimating?
A. Engineering Judgment
B. Delphi Technique
C. Round Table
D. Expert Opinion
E. None of the Above
F. All of the Above
E. None of the Above
All estimating techniques mentioned here are different guises for Expert Opinion, and hence inherently subjective.
Which of the following are risks associated with Parametric Estimating?
A. Imprecision of the intercept and slope of the regression line.
B. New technologies are not included in the historical data set.
C. Cost drivers change over time.
D. A and B only
E. B and C only
F. All of the above
G. None of the above
E. B and C only
Choice A is a concern, but relates to uncertainty. Choices B and C are risks.
Which of these general statements is true?
I. Analogies, Engineering Build-Ups and Parametric Estimates are all used equally throughout a program life cycle
II. Analogies and Parametric Estimates are more prevalent towards the end of a program life cycle, and Engineering Build-Ups are more prevalent earlier in the life cycle.
III. Analogies and Parametric Estimates are more prevalent towards the beginning of a program life cycle, and Engineering Build-Ups are more prevalent later in the life cycle
Statement III is generally true.
When the system is in an early phase (like the design phase), engineering estimates are not possible.
As the program matures, the estimates are more detailed.
Analogies and parametrics can still be useful later in a program’s life cycle, but they tend to be
phased out in favor of Build-Ups and Extrapolation From Actuals for most estimates.
True or False. All cost estimating methodologies have some weakness
True
True, all cost estimating methodologies have some weakness. It is important to understand what those weaknesses are and when to use which methodology.
Analogy, parametric, and build-up are the three primary costing techniques used in developing an estimate.
The Analogy technique refers to comparing the cost of an item to be estimated to that of a similar item.
The Parametric technique uses a mathematical relationship based on historical data to relate cost to one or more technical, performance, cost, or programmatic parameters.
The Build-up technique involves estimating costs at the lowest definable level and typically applies to Industrial Engineering (IE).
These costing techniques are discussed within the context to which they apply, specifically a Cost Element Structure (CES), and how they relate to the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).
Developing a cost and schedule estimate is the practical application of these techniques. Cost estimators typically use multiple techniques: one to derive the primary estimate and one or more to provide a cross-check to give confidence to the estimate
Other techniques include expert opinion and extrapolation from actuals.
The Expert Opinion technique uses subjective information from Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to corroborate or adjust cost estimates.
The Extrapolation from actuals technique uses data from prototypes or complete or partially complete units to project the cost of future units; it may also use earned value data to develop an Estimate At Completion (EAC) for any contract, phase, or program
the basic application of cost estimating principles
Past
Present
Future
Past
Historical cost
Historical productivity
Past systems data
Present
Current pricing data
Production data
Productivity data
Labor rates
Inflation rates
Normalization
Future
Learning curve analysis
Economic analysis
Parametric estimating
Adjusted analogies
Cost estimates always have some degree of uncertainty and risk, but cost estimators can quantify that uncertainty to accurately support decision making
Precision is the spread of the range of outcomes that the estimate produces. A narrow range requires greater precision while a wider range requires less.
By contrast, accuracy conveys whether the range is centered on the true value. If the center of the range is close to the true value, it is an accurate estimate.
Conversely, if it is nowhere near the center then the estimate is inaccurate. The standard illustration provided in many introductory science textbooks is a dartboard. If the darts cluster tightly about a single point, then the throws are precise. If the darts cluster around the bull’s eye, then the throws are accurate even if they are not tightly clustered.
Precision and accuracy in cost estimates are ideal, but accuracy is more important. Precision can give a false sense of security.