Unit I - Module 2 Cost Estimating Techniques Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

Which of the following estimating techniques relies heavily on the subjective opinion of an individual?

A. Parametric
B. Extrapolation from Actuals
C. Expert Opinion
D. Analogy
E. Build-Up
F. None of the Above
G. All of the Above

A

C. Expert Opinion

Parametric estimates and estimates based on Analogy use data from completed historical programs to
project future costs.

Extrapolation from Actuals is also data-based, though the data used may be from
either complete or incomplete units.

A BuildiUp estimates at the lowest possible level, and uses industrial engineering techniques, such as time standards, to develop an estimate at a low level.

Expert Opinion, on the other hand, relies on the subject opinion of the individual expert.
In fact, Expert Opinion is not generally accepted as a valid technique in and or itself, but rather the estimator’s judgment and expertise is used in applying one of the other methods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In estimating the cost of a “follow-on” contract for a program that has been in existence for an extended period of time for which the actual costs incurred to date on the specific program are readily available, what would be the preferred estimating methodology?

A. Expert Opinion
B. Extrapolation from Actuals
C. Analogy
D. Parametric
E. Build-Up
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above

A

B. Extrapolation from Actuals

Extrapolation from Actuals uses actuals from past or current items to predict future costs for the same item.

Extrapolation from Actuals is an umbrella term covering several estimating techniques, including learning curve and earned value management (EVM) estimates at complete (EACs), will be explored in subsequent modules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which of the following estimating techniques is based upon knowledge of the cost of a similar item and uses adjustment factors for the complexity, technical, or physical differences between the items?

A. Analogy
B. Expert Opinion
C. Extrapolation from Actuals
D. Parametric
E. Build-Up
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above

A

A. Analogy

A cost estimating analogy is an attempt to estimate costs by drawing a comparison between the item in question and a similar (or analogous) item.

An analogy can be done at the system, subsystem, or component level. Multiple analogies can be used at the lower WBS levels to build up to a higher level
estimate.

Two systems are rarely identical, and adjustments must be made to account for the differences between the old item and the new item. These adjustments are based on complexity, technical, or physical differences between the two items.

One difference between estimating parametrically and estimating with an analogy is that in parametric estimating, the analyst has multiple similar systems used to create a Cost Estimating Relationship, where in an analogy only one historical data point is used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Top-level technical data, such as the mass properties of an item, would most likely be used to support which estimating technique?

A. Build-Up
B. Parametric
C. Extrapolation From Actuals
D. Analogy
E. Expert Opinion
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above

A

B. Parametric

The parametric costing technique is a mathematical relationship between certain characteristics (such as weight, thrust, or power) as one or more independent variables of a system and the
system’s cost as a dependent variable.

If the data were at a lower level, such as a detailed mass properties report, that would more likely support the Build-Up technique.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A quantitative methodology for estimating the touch labor of manufacturing a product using labor standards is most likely to be part of the application of which of the following costing techniques?

A. Expert Opinion
B. Extrapolation From Actuals
C. Build-Up
D. Analogy
E. Parametric
F. All of the Above
G. None of the Above

A

C. Build-Up

The Build-Up method builds estimates for higher-level cost elements by summing or “rolling up” detailed estimates for lower-level cost elements.

A build-up is characterized by estimating at the lowest definable level at which data exist. Standards Development is the cornerstone of this technique.

The standards generally reflect an optimal production environment. They capture how long it takes to perform particular task, based on time and motion studies done in controlled environments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or False. A cost analyst that has the labor standards for manufacturing a landing gear bracket for the B-2 Bomber has enough information to determine the total cost of the landing gear bracket.

A

False

False. Manufacturing a landing gear bracket requires inputs beyond touch labor.
Material costs, for example, must also be included. On the labor side, support labor, ancillary labor, and indirects (overhead) must be considered (see Module 11 Manufacturing Cost Estimating for more
detail on these). This demonstrates one of the pitfalls of build-up estimating: omissions are likely.

It is very difficult to anticipate all costs beforehand. It is useful to cross-check a build up estimate with another estimating technique, like an analogy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When using a weight-based parametric estimating technique, it is necessary to know the material type being used (e.g., steel or composites).

True or False.

A

True

The variables used in the Cost Estimating Relationship (CER) developed using a parametric technique must either be constant or the data must be normalized such that differences do no effect the estimate.

The cost-per-pound of Steel vs. Composite Material is not equal. A weight-based parametric estimating technique is influenced by the type of material, and this variable must be known.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which of the following is a major shortcoming of using expert opinion as an estimating methodology?

A. It relies heavily on performance data
B. It takes a purely quantitative approach to estimating
C. Actual cost data is readily available
D. The opinion of an individual is not refutable
E. The estimate is always understated
F. It is likely that other experts exist with differing opinions
G. None of the Above

A

F. It is likely that other experts exist with differing opinions

Expert opinion is subjective. A different expert will likely have a different, subjective, opinion.

Because of this, without support from another, objective, estimating methodology, expert opinion
has little credibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A relationship between power (in kilowatts) and cost (in thousands of dollars) is an example of which methodology?

A. Extrapolation from Actuals
B. Expert Opinion
C. Analogy
D. Build-Up
E. SWAG Estimating
F. Atmospheric Extraction
G. Parametric

A

G. Parametric

The parametric costing technique is a mathematical relationship between certain characteristics (such as weight, thrust, or power) as one or more independent variables of a system and the
system’s cost as a dependent variable.

The stated relationship between kilowatts and cost is a parametric relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which methodology would be best to use when estimating the cost of the 20th lot of F/A - 18 C/D containing units 950 through 980 when complete historical costs are available for units 1 through 949?

A. Extrapolation From Actuals
B. Parametric
C. SWAG Estimating
D. Atmospheric Extraction
E. Analogy
F. Expert Opinion
G. Industrial Engineering

A

A. Extrapolation From Actuals

Extrapolation from actuals is best suited for follow–on units/lots when you have existing datafrom current and past production lots.

N.b., this assumes little change in the product design or manufacturing process from the previous units. If large changes exist, careful adjustments may have to be made or some other method chosen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When developing a cost estimate, you should always use the same costing technique for every element.

True / False

A

False

False. Some techniques may be better suited than others for certain elements in the estimate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

You must develop a cost estimate for the structure subsystem of a new communications satellite, COM2. The new satellite is similar to COM1, a communications satellite your company recently built. Through discussion with the structural engineers, you collected the data to the right. What should the estimated cost of the structure subsytem be?

A. $4 M
B. $5 M
C. $6.25 M
D. $10 M
E. None of the Above

A

C. $6.25 M

The data is recent, and the subsystem similar, so the analogous data does not need to be normalized
further. N.b., this is a cartoon example.

Defense of this cost estimate would require more in-depthinformation regarding, amongst other things, what constitutes “similar” and “recent.”

$5M * (250 kg/200 kg)= $6.25 M
or

$5M / 200 kg = 0.025 $M/kg
0.025 $M/kg * 250 kg = $6.25 M

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If a parametric Cost Estimating Relationship (CER) is given by the equation y = a + bx, which of the following statements is true?

I. x is the independent variable.
II. y usually represents cost.
III. When x increases by 1, y increases by a.

A. I only
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II only
E. I and III only
F. II and III only
G. I, II, and III

A

D. I and II only

Statements I and II are true: x is the independent variable in the equation and, in a CER, y usually represents costs. Statement III is incorrect. The correct statement is: when x increases by 1, y
increases by b, since b is the slope.

If you remember “rise over run,” you’ll see that the line goes up b units as it goes over 1 unit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which of the following pairs are the correct terms for the two main ways to structure a cost estimate?

A. Tops Down / Bottoms Up
B. Top Down/ Bottoms Up
C. Tops Down / Bottom Up
D. Top Down / Bottom Up

A

D. Top Down / Bottom Up

Top Down is generally associated with the use of Parametrics or Analogy; Bottom Up involves working from information at the lowest level to develop an estimate for an entire system.

When referencing either, remember they are both correctly referenced in the singular.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The standard for an item is 800 touch labor hours, and the documented variance factor is 18%. The corresponding indirect labor factor is 60%. What are the estimated touch labor hours for this item?

A. 800
B. 944
C. 1280
D. 1510.4

A

B. 944

Apply variance to touch labor hours:

800*1.18= 944 hours

Do not add in the additional 60% because that is indirect and the questions asks for touch labor (direct)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

True or False. A Cross-Check should result in exactly the same estimate as the original estimate.

A

False

False. A Cross-Check should be a similar number, of at least the same order of magnitude, but it will likely not be exactly the same as the original estimate. In fact, a cross check that results in exactly the same estimate as the original is suspicious.

17
Q

Which of the following estimating techniques is an objective method of estimating?

A. Engineering Judgment
B. Delphi Technique
C. Round Table
D. Expert Opinion
E. None of the Above
F. All of the Above

A

E. None of the Above

All estimating techniques mentioned here are different guises for Expert Opinion, and hence inherently subjective.

18
Q

Which of the following are risks associated with Parametric Estimating?

A. Imprecision of the intercept and slope of the regression line.
B. New technologies are not included in the historical data set.
C. Cost drivers change over time.
D. A and B only
E. B and C only
F. All of the above
G. None of the above

A

E. B and C only

Choice A is a concern, but relates to uncertainty. Choices B and C are risks.

19
Q

Which of these general statements is true?
I. Analogies, Engineering Build-Ups and Parametric Estimates are all used equally throughout a program life cycle
II. Analogies and Parametric Estimates are more prevalent towards the end of a program life cycle, and Engineering Build-Ups are more prevalent earlier in the life cycle.
III. Analogies and Parametric Estimates are more prevalent towards the beginning of a program life cycle, and Engineering Build-Ups are more prevalent later in the life cycle

A

Statement III is generally true.
When the system is in an early phase (like the design phase), engineering estimates are not possible.
As the program matures, the estimates are more detailed.
Analogies and parametrics can still be useful later in a program’s life cycle, but they tend to be
phased out in favor of Build-Ups and Extrapolation From Actuals for most estimates.

20
Q

True or False. All cost estimating methodologies have some weakness

A

True

True, all cost estimating methodologies have some weakness. It is important to understand what those weaknesses are and when to use which methodology.

21
Q

Analogy, parametric, and build-up are the three primary costing techniques used in developing an estimate.

A

The Analogy technique refers to comparing the cost of an item to be estimated to that of a similar item.

The Parametric technique uses a mathematical relationship based on historical data to relate cost to one or more technical, performance, cost, or programmatic parameters.

The Build-up technique involves estimating costs at the lowest definable level and typically applies to Industrial Engineering (IE).

These costing techniques are discussed within the context to which they apply, specifically a Cost Element Structure (CES), and how they relate to the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).

Developing a cost and schedule estimate is the practical application of these techniques. Cost estimators typically use multiple techniques: one to derive the primary estimate and one or more to provide a cross-check to give confidence to the estimate

22
Q

Other techniques include expert opinion and extrapolation from actuals.

A

The Expert Opinion technique uses subjective information from Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to corroborate or adjust cost estimates.

The Extrapolation from actuals technique uses data from prototypes or complete or partially complete units to project the cost of future units; it may also use earned value data to develop an Estimate At Completion (EAC) for any contract, phase, or program

23
Q

the basic application of cost estimating principles

Past
Present
Future

A

Past
Historical cost
Historical productivity
Past systems data

Present
Current pricing data
Production data
Productivity data
Labor rates
Inflation rates
Normalization

Future
Learning curve analysis
Economic analysis
Parametric estimating
Adjusted analogies

24
Q

Cost estimates always have some degree of uncertainty and risk, but cost estimators can quantify that uncertainty to accurately support decision making

A

Precision is the spread of the range of outcomes that the estimate produces. A narrow range requires greater precision while a wider range requires less.

By contrast, accuracy conveys whether the range is centered on the true value. If the center of the range is close to the true value, it is an accurate estimate.

Conversely, if it is nowhere near the center then the estimate is inaccurate. The standard illustration provided in many introductory science textbooks is a dartboard. If the darts cluster tightly about a single point, then the throws are precise. If the darts cluster around the bull’s eye, then the throws are accurate even if they are not tightly clustered.

Precision and accuracy in cost estimates are ideal, but accuracy is more important. Precision can give a false sense of security.

25
The idea of precision and accuracy manifests in cost estimating as uncertainty and risk.
Uncertainty captures the range of possible outcomes of the estimate which characterizes its precision. This is best done as a probability distribution, usually an empirical one resulting from a Monte Carlo simulation which can then be summarized with a confidence interval (e.g., one million dollars, plus or minus 15 percent). Risk refers to the upward shift applied to the cost estimate range to account for the fact that unadjusted estimates tend to be systematically low. This adjustment is intended to eliminate what appears to be an inherent bias in estimates and improves the estimate's accuracy. For instance, if costs come in on average 20% higher than the estimates, cost estimators may want to add 20% to the estimate. At first, this seems like a high percentage, but it is not atypical of historical cost growth on some programs. The proper treatment of uncertainty and risk is difficult because each involves some probability and statistics, but developing a best attempt is essential to produce meaningful and useful estimates.
26
The practice of cost estimating is not a repeatable experiment.
Same systems or units are not built repeatedly so that the range of costs can be observed. The system or unit is built once and one possible value is determined, which includes random or unknown elements, causing it to be above or below average. Even when building multiple units, as in a production run, each individual unit has its own random or unknown elements that produce variation around what should be a smooth learning curve.
27
Costing techniques are the building blocks of a cost estimate. They provide structure and predict future costs based on historical data. Costing techniques rely on statistical properties, logical relationships, and preference
Cost estimating is sometimes referred to as both a science and an art. In exploring costing techniques, cost estimators strive for the curiosity, creativity, and quest for truth found in both the arts and the sciences while maintaining a firmly analytical mindset. In this context, "creativity" means being versatile in applying various established techniques. The Analogy technique uses an estimate for an existing item to develop an estimate for a similar item. The parametric technique uses an established pattern based on known variables to provide an estimate for an item. By developing a statistical relationship or a cost estimating relationship (CER) between known variables, the analyst can infer the cost value for an item using these known variables. The Build-up technique is based on the concept that an item is the sum of its constituent parts. In this technique, the sum of each constituent element adds up to provide the cost for an item.
28
Costing Techniques Analogy Cost estimators think in analogies by comparing one item to another. In layman’s terms, an analogy is a comparison drawn for illustrative purposes, and it is generally a little more precise than a metaphor or a simile in that it seeks to exploit parallel logical (and sometimes quantitative) relationships
A cost estimating analogy is an attempt to estimate costs by drawing a comparison between the item in question and a similar (or analogous) item. Cost estimators develop analogies at the system, subsystem, or component level, and may use multiple analogies at the lower WBS levels to create to a higher level estimate. Generally, some adjustments must be made to the costs of the older item to estimate the new item. These adjustments include those based on programmatic information (e.g., quantity or schedule), physical characteristics (e.g., weight or materials), performance characteristics (e.g., power or pointing accuracy), government or commercial practices, or contract type (e.g., fixed price or cost plus). Economic adjustments for inflation (e.g., converting from constant dollars to then year dollars) are normally considered part of data normalization. For additional information, refer to Module 5 Index Numbers/Inflation. Objectivity is important when making an adjustment. Identify key cost drivers and then determine how the old item relates to the new and how that cost driver affects the costs. Remember that all estimates should be reasonable. The source of the analogy and any adjustments must be logical, credible, and acceptable to an informed
29
Costing Techniques Analogy Application Cost estimators typically use analogies early in the program life cycle when there is little definition in the new program or a lack of a pre-existing cost model. Most development programs have some heritage in design. The heritage or legacy system is used for comparison to the new system to be estimated. One of the first considerations when assessing the cost of a new development program is the percent of new design versus heritage or reuse. This assessment can be performed at system, subsystem, and component levels. An analogy can also be used when there is not enough data or program definition to develop a cost estimate using a more detailed technique. There should be a strong parallel between the historical system and the item to be estimated. Analogy is a one-for-one comparison. An analogy works best when:
there are many similarities between the old and new systems, adjustments are quantitative, not qualitative, and subjective adjustments are minimized or avoided altogether. An analogy is useful as a cross-check for other methods even when using other more detailed costing techniques. In this case, the estimates should have the same order of magnitude
30
Costing Techniques Analogy Considerations There are several advantages of using an analogy.
One advantage is that it can be used before detailed program requirements are known. The more similar the systems, the stronger the analogy and the easier it is to stand up to review. The analogy is also an easy technique to use if a sufficient database exists on an analogous system.
31
Costing Techniques Analogy Considerations There are also disadvantages to using an analogy
One disadvantage is that there is a tendency to be too subjective in making an analogy. For analogies that require too many subjective adjustments, this technique is not appropriate. An assessment that a new component is 20% more complex without specifying a rationale is not acceptable. Associate the complexity to something less subjective. An appropriate adjustment would be that the new component has 20% more integrated circuits or weighs 20% more than the old component. However, it is often difficult to find sufficient cost, technical, and programmatic data for drawing these types of analogies.
32
Costing Techniques Analogy Comparison In comparing the analogy technique with the parametric technique, an adjusted analogy is like a linear regression
but instead of basing the slope on a number of data points, it is essentially a guess. One point does not determine a line, so the assumption is that the line goes through the origin. Since the analogy is a single data point, it represents a point of departure and any estimate using adjusted analogy constitutes estimating outside the range of the data.
33
Costing Techniques Analogy Uncertainty and Risk Uncertainty is the range of possible outcomes of the estimate
For estimates based on an analogy, there will be uncertainty in both the point of departure and the slope of the adjustment. The point of departure is the analogous system. There is uncertainty in whether or not the chosen point of departure is truly analogous to the new system. An estimate based on an analogy assumes a linear relationship between the old and the new system. The unknown nature of the underlying relationship between the two systems creates uncertainty. If data exists to understand the underlying relationship between the two systems, use the parametric estimating technique.
34
Costing Techniques Analogy Uncertainty and Risk For estimates based on an analogy, there are risks not included in the analogous system
This means that the new system may have risks that would not have been captured in the costs associated with the old system. Examples include risks associated with new technologies, risks associated with economic conditions (e.g., inflation), and risks associated with the labor environment. There may also be risk characterized by historical growth in the scaling quantity. As a system or project progresses in the program life cycle and the design matures, the scaling quantity used in the analogy may change. Insight into the historical growth of the scaling quantity allows cost estimators to capture the potential for growth as risk. Examples may include size, power, weight, or lines of code. For additional information about quantifying these risks and incorporating them into your cost estimate, refer to Module 9 Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis.
35
Costing Techniques Parametric The parametric costing technique is a mathematical relationship between certain characteristics (e.g., weight, thrust, or power) as one or more independent variables of a system and the system’s cost as a dependent variable. These relationships are developed using data collected on similar programs
The independent variables are known as cost drivers and could be physical characteristics, performance or operational parameters, programmatic variables, or even other costs. Developing a parametric relationship uses multiple systems to cover a broader range than an analogy. A parametric relationship also allows statistical inferences to be made. These statistical relationships will be able to tell you how well your parametric equation works. When developing a parametric equation, the underlying assumption is that the historical framework on which the parametric relationship is based will remain the same for the new system (e.g., the technology, manufacturing processes, etc., are not drastically changing). A parametric relationship could range in complexity from a simple rule of thumb (e.g., dollars per pound ($/lb)) to a complex regression equation (e.g., Effort = 0.0114 * New SLOC + [0.04 * Reused SLOC]^0.9766). Parametric relationships are commonly referred to as CERs which include rates, factors, and ratios. For additional details on parametric relationships, refer to Module 3 Parametric Estimating. For details on statistically based techniques for developing parametric equations, refer to Module 8 Regression Analysis. Develop CERs using regression whenever possible to enable the statistical inferences previously discussed. Note, however, that many rates, factors, and ratios in use may not be statistically based.
36