unit three test review Flashcards
(90 cards)
arrest
person suspected of a crime is taken into custody
arrest warrant
court order commanding that the person named in it be taken into custody
probable cause
having a reasonable belief that a specific person has committed a crime
drug courier profile
helps to establish probable cause for arrest, commonly held notions concerning typical age, race, appearance, etc of drug couriers
reasonable suspicion
based on even less suspicion than probable cause for arrest, but more than a hunch.
exclusionary rule
evidence seized in an unlawful search cannot be used in trial. (exceptions: inevitability-evidence would eventually be obtained legally, good faith-police officer acted in good faith when obtaining the evidence)
search warrant
court order, obtained from a judge who believes there is a bona fide (genuine) need to search person/ place
affadavit
sworn statement of facts/circumstances that provide the probable cause to believe that a search is justified
interrogate
standard police procedure to question the arrested. usually results in admissions of guilt
self incrimination
suspect has a right to remain silent, cannot be forced to testify against themselves at trial
custodial interrogation
person is in custody, not free to leave, and is being questioned by police
booking
formal process of making a police record of the arrest. accused is asked to provide name, address, DOB, place of employment, and any previous arrest details
arraignment
reading of a criminal charging document in the presence of the defendant, to inform of all charges against them
bail/pretrial release
judge will consider how likely the person is to show up for trial and if person is a danger. you put up by money/property.
personal recognizance
the defendant must promise to return and must be considered a low risk of failing to show up for trial
information (prosecutor’s information)
details the nature/circumstances of the charge
preliminary hearing
screening process used in felony cases to determine if there is enough evidence to require the defendant to stand at trial
grand jury
16-23 people who must determine whether there is sufficient cause to believe a person has committed a crime and should stand trial
indictment
formal charge of criminal action
nolo contendere
plea where the defendant does not admit guilt but does not contest the charges equivalent to pleading guilty. cannot be used as evidence against them in later civil cases
due process
fair procedures
voir dire
lawyers select certain jurors to hear a case
for cause challenge
potential juror can be removed for a specific reason
peremptory challenge
do not have to based on a specific reason