UNIT3 AOS2; Civil Law Part A Flashcards
(63 cards)
Civil Law
Civil action is when an individual suffers damages as a result of their rights being infringed by the actions of another party
- Can be remedied by the parties negotiating and reaching a suitable agreement
Plaintiff
The person initiating a civil action
Defendant
The responding party, the one civil action is being put against
Torts
Negligence, defamation, trespass or nuisance claims
Contract
Involving legally binding agreements between two or more parties
Burden of Proof
- Plaintiff must prove the case, prove the defendant is in the wrong
- Presents evidence to establish the case against the defendant
Defendant has the burden of proof when making a counterclaim
Standard of Proof
- Strength or amount of evidence needed to prove the case
- Must be proved on the balance of probabilities
Balance of Probabilities
The plaintiff must prove that they are most probably or most likely in the right and the other party is most likely wrong
49% or less - 51% or more
Factors to Consider Before Initiating a Claim
- Costs
- Limitations of Action
- Enforcement Issues
- Costs
The high cost of legal representation can act as a barrier to many people who wish to take a civil issue to court.
Plaintiff needs to consider whether it is worth pursuing
Depend on:
- The complexity
- The number of witnesses
- The expertise of the lawyer
Example:
Senior solicitor $500-$800 p/h
Senior barrister $9000 per day
Additional Costs
Magistrates court can cost from 70 thousand to 100 thousand
Mediation is $2,000 to $20,000 per day
- If not successful, may have to pay for the defendant’s costs. Usually the losing party pays for the winning party’s costs.
- Limitations of Actions
Restrictions placed on the time within which a civil action can be commenced
Reasons:
- So the defendant doesn’t have to face an action after a significant amount of time
- Evidence is not lost and people can still remember what happened
- So they are resolved as quickly as possible
IN GENERAL a claim must be commenced within six years after the date on which the action occurred.
3 years for personal injury, 1 year for defamation cases
- Not particularly date of wrong doing but date of which the plaintiff first knows
- Enforcement Issues
Plaintiff will need to consider whether the defendant is able to pay and whether or not the defendant will pay
- The defendant is in jail
- Bankrupt or have little money to pay
- Overseas or uncontactable
Mediation
Parties in conflict sit down and discuss issues involved, develop options, consider alternatives and try reach an agreement through negotiation.
- Resolution is made by the parties (voluntarily)
- Third party mediator facilitates communication between parties but doesn’t offer solutions
Conciliation
Similar to mediation but the conciliator has more influence over the outcome
- Resolution is made by the parties (it may be on the advice of the conciliator)
- Third party conciliator facilitate communication between the parties and offers suggestions and solutions
Mediation and Conciliation; Suitable
- Relationship between parties will continue, like families or friends
- Both parties are prepared to compromise and stick to the agreement
- When parties want privacy and confidentiality
- When the court has referred the dispute to mediation or conciliation
- When legal costs are expected to be high
Mediation and Conciliation; Unsuitable
- When overwhelming emotions may interfere with negotiations
- Irreparable damages between the parties
Like broken promises, violent/threatening behaviors, one or more parties unwilling to co-operate - Imbalance of power between the parties
- Where the matter is urgent
Strengths of Mediation and Conciliation
- Less formal and less intimidating
- Safe and supportive environment
- Save time and money
- Experienced third party
Weaknesses of Mediation and Conciliation
- Decisions may not be binding/enforceable
- No ability to appeal decision
- One party may be stronger so the other party is intimidated, someone who is wealthy
Arbitration
Independent arbitrator makes a final and binding decision. It’s conducted in private and is informal. Equal opportunities for everyone.
- Resolution is decided by the arbitrator
- Third party listens to the evidence and arguments of disputing parties then make a decision
Arbitration; Suitable
- When the claim is less than $10,000
- When parties want some rules of evidence
- When parties want a binding and enforceable award made by an independent third party
- To avoid publicity and keep confidentially and privacy
Arbitration; Unsuitable
- Where the parties have not agreed to arbitrate the dispute
- When parties want greater control over the process and outcome
- Want to have their case in court
- More comfortable with formal rules or evidence and procedure
Strengths of Arbitration
- Decision is binding and fully enforceable
- Usually faster than courts
- Arbitrators, expert on the subject
- Private and confidential, great for parties wanting to avoid publicity
Weaknesses of Arbitration
- Arbitrations can be formal, this adds to stress, time and costs
- Parties have no control over outcome
- The right to appeal is limited