US Supreme Court Flashcards

(78 cards)

1
Q

How many cases are SCOTUS requested to review every year?

A

Over 7,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many cases do SCOTUS review a year?

A

100-150

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is judicial review?

A

The process by which the Supreme Court decides whether a law or government action is constitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many justices are on the Supreme Court?

A

9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why does the Supreme Court have enormous power in the US?

A

Constitutional sovereignty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How long are justices’ tenures?

A

For life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who nominates Supreme Court justices?

A

The president

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What factors will the president consider when choosing a Supreme Court nominee?

A
  • Judicial experience and legal knowledge
  • Professional reputation
  • Share a similar political belief
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What conservative legal group helped Trump choose his Supreme Court nominees?

A

The Federalist Society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why do presidents have to ensure their pick for the judiciary will have widespread support?

A

Nominations must be confirmed by the Senate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Example of the White House failing to uncover a SCOTUS nominee’s controversial background

A

In 1987, Reagan announced his nominee, Douglas Ginsburg, however it was later uncovered that he had used marijuana while a law professor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Senate Judiciary Committee?

A

A standing committee in the Senate which has the job of considering Supreme Court nominations. It conducts hearings and then votes whether to recommend the nominee or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What court have 8/9 Supreme Court Justices previously come from?

A

the Court of Appeals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Example of a Supreme Court judge who had never been a judge before?

A

Elena Kagan - had previously worked in the Justice Department

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does the Senate Judiciary Committee’s vote have any significance?

A

While it is only a recommendation, it normally signifies how the Senate will end up voting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Judiciary Committee vote compare to her Senate vote?

A

Received unanimous support in her recommendary vote
Passed 96-3 in the Senate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How did Clarence Thomas’s Judiciary Committee vote compare to his Senate vote?

A

Received 7-7 in his recommendary vote
Passed 52-48 in the Senate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why, until 2013, did Supreme Court nominees need over 60 votes to secure nomination?

A

Opposition could filibuster the proceedings, and 60 votes are needed for a cloture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the filibuster?

A

A tactic used in the Senate to prevent a vote - there is limited time allowed for voting so senators will aim to use up all this time through debating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a cloture?

A

The process for ending a filibuster - A simple majority is needed to stop a senator talking and allow the vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When was the filibuster removed for Senate judiciary appointment confirmations?

A

2013 by the Democrats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the significance of removing the filibuster for Senate judiciary appointments?

A

A nominee can pass with the support of only one party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Who was the first Supreme Court nominee (in recent history) to not receive a single vote from the minority party in their confirmation?

A

Amy Coney Barrett, 2020

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When was the last time the Senate voted to reject a nominee?

A

1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
When was the last time a SCOTUS nomination was withdrawn by the president?
2005
26
Why did the Republican Senate refuse to hold hearings for Merrick Garland in 2016?
As there was to be an election later that year, they suggested the new president should have the right to choose their nominee
27
Why was the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett controversial?
They nominated Amy Coney Barrett weeks before the 2020 election, going back on the precedent they set of not allowing new appointments in election years
28
Which president nominated Clarence Thomas?
George H W Bush
29
Why was Clarence Thomas' nomination controversial?
He had serious accusations of sexual harassment, which he denied, suggesting it was a racially motivated attack
30
How many Democrats supported Thomas in the Senate vote?
11
31
How many Democrats supported Thomas in the Senate vote?
11
32
Who was seen as the court's "swing vote", before his resignation?
Anthony Kennedy
33
Which Justice replaced Anthony Kennedy?
Brett Kavanagh
34
Why was Brett Kavanagh's nomination contraversial?
He had an allegation of sexual assault
35
What is the process of nomination to SCOTUS?
1. Presidential shortlist 2. Approval from FBI 3. President decides on nominee 4. Senate Judiciary Committee hearings 5. Senate vote
36
How does having life terms improve judicial independence?
The president's ability to influence them ends once they are appointed and they cannot be removed for making unpopular decisions
37
Example of a justice shifting ideology over time
David Souter, appointed by HW Bush, became unexpectedly liberal
38
Example of justices ruling against the president that appointed them
RBG and Breyer ruled against Clinton in 1997, that he was not immune to prosecution
39
Trump v Mazars (2020)
7-2 ruling that Trump did not have the absolute right to withhold his tax returns and financial records from investigation IMPORTANCE: Gorsuch and Kavanagh voted AGAINST Trump
40
Is the SCOTUS appointment process fit for purpose? - YES
- Detailed scrutiny - Several opportunities for candidates to withdraw - Senate Judiciary Committee are experts in law - Check on the power of the president
41
Is the SCOTUS appointment process fit for purpose? - NO
- Presidents choose nominees who support their philosophy - Questioning by the Judiciary Committee often aggressive and politicised - The refusal to hold hearings for Merrick Garland violated the president's right to appoint justices - Depends on which party controls the Senate
42
Who is the current chief justice?
John Roberts (appointed by W Bush)
43
What are the roles of the chief justice?
- Chairs court - Decides which justices will write opinions on cases - Chair presidential impeachment trials
44
What is the current con-lib makeup of SCOTUS?
6-3
45
What is a majority opinion?
An explanation of a judgment made by the Supreme Court
46
What is a minority opinion?
If a ruling isn't unanimous, the minority side write a statement suggesting why the ruling is incorrect
47
Why was Anthony Kennedy seen as the 'swing vote'?
He was conservative on issues such as gun control and campaign finance, but supported same-sex marriage and affirmative action
48
What is partisan gerrymandering?
The practice of redrawing electoral districts to give advantage to one political party
49
Rucho v Common Cause (2019)
Court ruled 5-4 that partisan gerrymandering is not illegal
50
How many women have ever sat on SCOTUS?
Six (inc. Brown-Jackson)
51
What are the two constitutional roles of SCOTUS?
- Interpreting the constitution - Protecting citizens' rights
52
What is strict constructionism?
A judicial approach which involves following the text of the constitution as closely as possible
53
What is originalism?
A judicial approach in which the constitution is interpreted according to the intentions of the framers
54
What is the argument for strict constructionism?
There is already a process for amending the constitution but the constitution should be followed closely in its current form
55
What is loose constructionism?
A judicial approach in which the constitution is applied to a modern context
56
What is a living constitution?
The idea that the Constitution is a living document which should be interpreted according to the needs of modern society
57
Why do liberals criticise strict constructionism?
It prevents necessary and positive change
58
Why do conservatives criticise loose constructionism?
They see it as a power grab by unelected justices
59
Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores Inc (2010)
The court struck down part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act as it violated the 1st amendment by making businesses contribute to contraception in their health insurance
60
Citizens United v FEC (2010)
The court ruled that corporations, unions and associations have the same right to political donations as individuals under the 1st amendment
61
DC v Heller (2008)
The court struck down a law banning handgun ownership in Washington D.C. as it infringes ones' 2nd amendment rights
62
Baze v Rees (2008)
The court ruled that death by lethal injection was NOT "cruel and unusual punishment" (8th amendment)
63
Boumedine v Bush (2008)
The court ruled that foreign nationals detained as terrorist suspects by George W. Bush had the right to challenge this in federal courts
64
United States v Texas (2016)
Struck down Obama's executive order which delayed the deportation of 5m illegal immigrants
65
What Supreme Court ruling gave them the power of judicial review?
Marbury v Madison (1803)
66
What are landmark rulings?
Supreme Court judgements which establish new legal principles or fundamentally change the way in which the constitution is interpreted
67
Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
It was ruled unconstitutional to prevent same-sex marriage
68
Bush v Gore (2000)
The court ruled 5-4 in favour of preventing the Florida Electoral College recount. In effect, the court had picked the next president by stopping the recount with Bush in the lead
69
Why can the court be described as 'quasi-legislative'?
The court has gone above simply interpreting the law and instead now makes the law - "legislating from the bench"
70
What is judicial restraint?
Judges who restrain from making politicised decisions as they are unelected - typically practiced by conservative judges
71
What is 'stare decisis'?
"To stand by things decided" - referring to the convention that judges follow legal precedent where possible
72
What is judicial activism?
Decisions made by judges which they believe will improve society
73
Brown v Topeka (1954)
Struck down the doctrine of 'separate but equal' facilities for white and black Americans, ending segregation
74
Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
Struck down a law passed by Congress in 1992 which prohibited states from authorising sports gambling
75
Is the Supreme Court too political? - YES
- Unelected can make changes to most controversial public policy - Politicised appointments process - Court has increased power of the federal government over states - Decided election outcome in Bush v Gore 2000
76
Is the Supreme Court too politicised? - NO
- For the constitution to remain relevant, the court must apply it to modern times - Justices are independent - Judges vote against their president's interests sometimes - Congress can overturn a court's decision with a constitutional amendment
77
Significance of Brown v Topeka (1954)
- Showed an activist court who were willing to make political decisions - Reduced states' rights - Overturned a ruling from 60 years earlier (Plessy v Ferguson)
78
Significance of Roe v Wade (1973)
- The framers had no intention of protecting abortion in the constitution, so Conservatives argued this was 'legislating from the bench' - Overturned in 2022