UT Flashcards
(32 cards)
Bentham 1748-1832
ACT UT ( founded movement: Philosphical radicals)
Mill (1806-1873)
RULE UT- first person to call for votes for women in parliament.
” Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be socrates dissatisfied then a fool satisfied”
Peter singer- 1946-
Preference UT ( influenced by his teacher RM Hare)
ACT utilitarianism
Purpose of morality is to make a world a better place. Morality is about producing good consquences not having good intentions, bring most benefit to all of humanity. Puspose of morality is to guide people’s actions in such a way to produce a better world. Thus, UT is about the consquences ( consquenalist and telelogical ethical theory)
ACT UT fundamental imperative:
always act the way that will produce the greastest Overall amount of happiness
ACT UT- action?
Ethical theory for society to live by- should decide how to balance pain and pleasure, action that produces most pleasures for the most people ought to be informed.
Principle of utility
ACT UT0 theory of usefulness- the greatest happiness for the greatest number, this should be applied directly to every single action. Judges each ethical dilemma on its indiviual situation and would act based on how we saw the action.
Happiness= Pleasure- pain
What was the sole good in life for Bentham?
Pleasure was the soul good in life and pain the sole evil, thus he was a hedonist ( One who believes the pursuit of pleasure is most important)
What was the hedonic calculus
- Purity- Measuring tendency of pleasure to produce pain
2.Remoteness- distance of anticipated benefits - Richness- Likelihood that pleasure will be followed by more pleasure
4.Intensity- Power of the pleasure - Certainty- Probability of the act resulting in pleasure
- Extent- Number of people affected by the action
- Duration- length of pleasure
Act UT strengths- 1
- Assesses individual situations one by one and thus produces a unique answer fit for complexity of human life
-Hedonic calculus discourages monstrous behaviour by ensuring likelihood of pain is always considered in any condition
-Everyone is a competent judge and everyone’s happiness is worth as much as everyone else’s
Act UT strengths- 2
Clear theory based on single principle and accessible via common sense. clear and consistent ethics anyone can understand
Flexible- avoids pitfalls of absolutist ethics
Equality/ democracy- interests of all people and favours majority
Act UT Weaknesses- 1
Time consuming and life cannot be stopped whilst run through question of if we should kill someone to protect ourselves through hedonic calculus
Reduces morality to mathematical formula, ignoring other values we should still strive for such as compassion, equality and love
HC seems unreliable likely that two people wull apply it to same situation and get different results
Act UT Weaknesses-2
- Contradictory: what is more important greatest happiness or greatest number? Pojman example of competition as 3 peiple run different distances in different times, cannot measure who did best. can’t measure.
- Difficult to predict outcome of every action- cannot predict future-
- No rest objection- no rest from doing good, no time to have own pleasures
- Williams- UT can cause us to go against deeply help moral principles, compromising our moral integrity.
what did mill argue about act UT?
Mill argued that the greatest good for greatest number should not be quantitative matter, quality of pleasure should also matter
Rule UT higher pleasure and lower pleasure?
Higher pleasure: of the mind and intellectual e.g. Theatre
Lower pleasure: sensual and physical e.g. sex and sweets
(Rule UT)component judges?
Someone who has experiences both higher and lower pleasures thus can distinguish between both
Rule UT
Rule UT: an applies moral rule, basical moral rule that allows society to function, consquences of having everuone follow particular rules and calculate overall rules
Strong rule UT and weak rule UT? ( Rule UT)
Strong rule UT: strong form of theory that maintains that rules established through application of UT principles should never be broken
Weak Rule UT: weak version tries to account for the possibility that those same UT principles can take precedence in a particular situation over a general rule, however rule would still form part of the decision making process
So overall what does Rule UT do?
Looks at consquences of having everyone follow a rule and calculated overal utility of accepting or rejecting the rule.
Strengths of Rule UT- 1
More consistent than bentham, due to rule making, less vunerable to indiviual interpretations of events and their consquences
Argues for quality over quantity of pleasure, higher pleasure enrich our lives and develop human abilties
Strengths of Rule UT- 2
Not just about the consequences as improving people, can use Bentham’s HC many times but not grow and develop as a moral agent
Recognises pleasure is complex and different for different people
Weakness of Rule UT- 1
Component judges- who is a component judge? seems elitist when the poorly educated or those in poverty cannot access “higher pleasure”
Rule UT is too rigid- fails to consider complexity of indiviual situations
Weakness of Rule UT- 2
No clear guidance on how to decide between 2 possible actions where both could potientially produce higher pleasure for peiple
Higher and lower pleasures are hard to define
Preference UT-
Someone who wants to maximise satisfaction of what sentient beings want, their desires need to be satisfied and minimising suffering.
Extends UT to include all sentient beings (animals)