Validity Flashcards
(18 cards)
Validity in psychological research
-Researchers produce findings based off of data that is collected from psychological studies
-We need to question whether the findings are truly reflective of natural behaviour
Internal validity
-Internal validity is questioning if the measurement of change in the dependent variable is solely due to the manipulation of the independent variable
-If any other factors (extraneous variable) influenced the change in dependent variable (due to the lack of control) the findings lack internal validity
-Factors that cause findings from studies to lack internal validity (social desirability bias)
-Social desirability bias can cause participants to alter their behaviour to try and make themselves appear in more of a “Positive light”
Factors that cause findings from studies to lack internal validity (Demand characteristics)
-If participants discover/ think they have discovered the aim of the study, demand characteristics can cause them to alter their behaviour in a way that they think the researcher wants to see (will match their research hypothesis)
Factors that cause findings from studies to lack internal validity (Investigator bias)
-This is when the researchers behaviour or personal characteristics can influence the behaviour or responses of participants (e.g a researcher may have more positive body language or voice tonality when a participant is acting in a way that supports their research hypothesis)
Factors that can cause findings from studies to lack internal validity (researcher bias)
-A researcher can interpret participant behaviour in a way that supports their research hypothesis
Factors that can cause the findings of studies to lack internal validity (Uncontrolled extraneous variable)
-A lack of control of extraneous variables (e.g not using standardised procedures or not controlling participant variables)
External validity
-External validity questions whether a study’s results are generalisable to outside of the study
Ecological validity (external validity)
-Ecological validity is how generalisable the findings of a particular study are to alternative settings
-For example would the results from a study on memory still be the same in a busy city street compared to a lab setting
Mundane realism (external validity)
-Mundane realism is how close the tasks used in the study are to everyday real life tasks
-If a the task a participant completes is similar to a task that they perform in real life, then the response will be more natural, increasing the external validity of the findings
Population validity (external validity)
-Population validity is the extent to which the sample is representative of the target population (e.g education level, ethnicity, gender)
Temporal validity (external validity)
-Temporal validity refers to how generalisable findings from studies are over periods of time
-Many older studies were conducted when society, politics and technologies were very different, and if they were replicated now would produce very different findings
Assessing validity (face validity)
-Face validity is whether a test appears to measure what it claims to be measuring
-Criterion validity
-Criterion validity increases confidence in the validity of a test if when the data collected from the test is compared to another measurement of the same variable (using a different method) there is a strong correlation
Concurrent validity
-Concurrent validity is the extent to which data collected by the newly created tests are similar to the data collected from previously established tests
-This uses a test of correlation (0.8 or stronger score indicates high concurrent validity)
Predictive validity
-Predictive validity is the extent to which performances in tests are predicitve of future performances/outcomes/behaviours (e.g GCSE results are very predictive of future A level results)
How can internal validity be improved
-Internal validity can be improved by having a high level of control over all variables involved
-For examples techniques such as: random allocation, standardised procedures, single blind and double blind trials,counterbalancing and peer review
How can external validity be improved
-External validity can be improved by making findings generalisable to outside of the study
-This involves conducting replications of the study:
-Replication of findings in multiple settings (ecological validity)
-Replication of findings with diverse groups of people (population validity)
-Replication of findings with more real world realistic tasks (mundane realism
-Replication of historical studies (temporal validity)