Validity of Will Flashcards

1
Q

Requirements of a Valid Will

A

A valid will must meet the formalities of being in writing, signed and witnessed (2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Witness Requirement

A

The will requires the signature of two witnesses who:

  1. Know the document is a will; and
  2. Both are present at the same time to witness the testator’s signing of the will (or acknowledgement of his signature) during the testator’s lifetime. However, it is not necessary for the two witnesses to sign attesting to the fact at the same time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Not properly witnessed

A

If witness requirements are not satisfied the will can still be treated as properly executed if the proponent of the will establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the testator intended the document to be his will at the time he signed it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interested witnesses

A

Witnesses should not be “interested witnesses”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Holographic Will

A

A will that does not comply with the formalities required for a valid will can qualify as a valid holographic will if the signature and material provisions are all in the testator’s handwriting. A holographic will does not require a date.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When is capacity measured for will formation

A

It is measured at the time of will execution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the requirements for capacity to create a valid will?

A
  1. “Of legal age (at least 18 years old) and sound mind”

2. Free from duress, menace, fraud and undue influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mental Capacity to create a valid will

A

An individual is not mentally competent to make a will if, at the time the will is made, he is unable to:

  1. Understand the nature of the testamentary act.
  2. Understand the nature and situation of property.
  3. Remember and understand his relations with family members that are affected by the will.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mental Disorders that affect creation of a valid will

A

An individual is not mentally competent to make a will if he suffers from a mental disorder that results in hallucinations or delusions that cause him to devise property in a way that he would not have done but for the disorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fraud for Wills & Trusts

A

Fraud is the misrepresentation, deceit or concealment of a material fact, know to be false by the wrongdoer, with the intent to deprive a person of property or legal rights or cause injury, and does in fact deprive the person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fraud in the Execution

A

occurs when a testator is unaware he is signing a will or the will is forged by another, resulting in the entire will being invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fraud in the Inducement

A

occurs when a wrongdoer influences the testator through misrepresentations to include provisions in a will, resulting in only those particular fraudulent provisions being invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fraud in preventing revocation

A

occurs when fraud is implemented to prevent a will revocation; a court will still probate the will and the wrongdoer will take under a constructive trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Undue Influence for Wills & Trusts

A

is found when the testator executes a will:

a. Leaving an unnatural disposition of his property, and
b. The beneficiaries had opportunity to influence this disposition, and
c. The testator was susceptible to their influence
d. The beneficiaries were active in procuring this disposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fraud or Undue Influence is presumed in an instrument making a donative transfer to:

A

a. The person who drafted it.
b. The person in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed.
c. A care custodian of the transferor adult during the period services where provided, or within 90 days of provision of services.
d. A cohabitant or employee of above people (a-c)
The presumption can be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exceptions to the fraud or undue influence presumption

A
  1. When the beneficiary is a blood relative or cohabitant of the transferor, or
  2. When the property transferred is valued at $5,000 or less, or
  3. When an independent attorney reviews the instrument and counsels the transferor with the beneficiary being present.
17
Q

Conflict of Laws for Wills

A

A written will is validly executed if its execution complies with the law of the place where testator is domiciled at the time of execution of the will or domiciled at the time of death or complies with the law of the place the will was executed.

18
Q

Insane Delusion

A

A will can be attacked if at the time of execution the testator was suffering from an insane delusion. This requires showing:

  1. T has a false belief
  2. That false belief was the product of a sick mind
  3. There is no evidence to support the belief, not even a scintilla of evidence
  4. Delusions must have affected testator’s will
19
Q

Elements of Fraud

A
  1. There must be a representation;
  2. Of material fact;
  3. Known to be false by the wrongdoer;
  4. For the purpose of inducing action or inaction; and
  5. In fact induces action or inaction desired.
20
Q

Three types of fraud

A
  1. Fraud in execution
  2. Fraud in inducement
  3. Fraud in preventing testator from revoking the will
21
Q

Fraud in execution

A

Someone forges T’s signature to will. Entire will is invalid.

22
Q

Fraud in inducement

A

The wrongdoer’s representation affects the contents of T’s will. Only that part of the will that is affected by the fraud is invalid. Court can:

  1. Give property to residuary devisees
  2. If no residue, to heirs of law by intestate succession
  3. Constructive trust
23
Q

Fraud in preventing testator from revoking

A

Variation of fraud in inducement.

a. Court will not probate the will and thus the property would go to heirs;
b. Simultaneously, the court will also decree that the heir is constructive trustee who has a duty: to transfer the property to the intended beneficiary as determined by the court.

24
Q

Undue Influence

A

Testator’s free will is subjugated

25
Q

How can undue influence be established?

A
  1. Prima Facie case
  2. Case law presumption
  3. Statutory Presumption
26
Q

Prima Facie Case Elements (Undue Influence)

A
  1. Susceptibility- Testator has a weakness such that he is able to have his free will subjugated.
  2. Opportunity- the wrongdoer had access to the testator.
  3. Active participation - it is the wrongful act that gets the gift.
  4. An unnatural result - the wrongdoer is taking a devise, and this person ordinarily would not be expected to take a devise.
27
Q

Case Law Presumption Elements (Undue Influence)

A
  1. Confidential relationship between T and wrongdoer
    a. California recognizes all confidential relationships:
  2. attorney-client
  3. doctor-patient
  4. guardian-ward
  5. clery-parishioner
  6. trustee-beneficiary
    b. In addition, in CA, a confidential relationship arises whenever one person reposes trust in other.
  7. Active participation
  8. An unnatural result
28
Q

Consequences of undue influence

A
  1. Only that part of the will affected by the undue influence is invalid.
  2. The affected part goes to:
    a. Residuary if any, if none;
    b. Heirs at law by intestate succession; or
    c. Via constructive trust remedy: the tainted part of the will goes to residuary devisees, if any, or if none to the heirs at law;
    d. Court will use one which provides best result.
29
Q

Statutory Presumption of Undue Influence

A

CA law presumes the provision of an instrument (will, trust, deed) making a donative transfer to the following person is the product of undue influence:

  1. Person who drafted the instrument;
  2. A person in fiduciary relationship with the transferor (e.g., trustee or attorney) who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed; or
  3. A “care custodian” of a “dependent adult,” but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or w/in 90 days before or after that period; or
  4. A spouse, domestic partner or blood relative of (1)-(3)
  5. A cohabitant or employee of (1)-(3)
  6. A partner, shareholder, or employer of a law firm in which the drafter has an ownership interest.
30
Q

Statutory presumption does not apply when:

A
  1. donative transfer to a person who is the spouse, domestic partner, or cohabitant, or a person related by blood, within the “fourth degree”
  2. Instrument is drafted or transcribed by a person who is a spouse, domestic partner, or cohabitant of the transferor, or by a person related by blood, within “fourth degree” to transferor
  3. Instrument reviewed by independent attorney, who concludes it is not the product of undue influence.
  4. A transfer does not exceed $5,000, if the estate is over $100,000 (i.e., a “small” gift when there is a “big” estate)
31
Q

Consequences of finding undue influence under the statutory presumption:

A

a. The transferee is deemed to have predeceased the transferor without spouse, domestic partner, or issue. Thus, the gift “lapses” or fails, meaning that the transferee does not take
b. As to the lapses gift, it passes to the residuary, devisee if any, or, if no residue if the lapsed gift is itself residue, to the heirs at law by intestate succession.

32
Q

California Harmless Error Rule

A

If will fails due to formalities in signing by testator or witnessing of the traditional formalities approach, under California’s “clear and convincing” standard the will can still be admitted into probate if the proponent of the will establishes by “clear and convincing” evidence that at the time the testator signed the will, he or she intended the will to constitute his or her will.

33
Q

Presence

A

Sight presence: the witnesses see testator sign;
Conscious presence: testator signs and acknowledges within the witnesses hearing and the witnesses know what is being done.

34
Q

Choice of law

A

The will be admitted into probate in CA if the will complies with the formalities of execution of:

  1. California law
  2. The law of the place where the will was executed
  3. The law of the place of T’s domicile at the time of execution.