VI. RESCISSION OF INSURANCE CONTRACTS Flashcards
(41 cards)
What is “ubberimae fides”?
Perfect good faith.
How does the Code define concealment?
IC. Sec. 26. A neglect to communicate that which a party knows and ought to communicate, is called a concealment.
What is the effect of a concealment?
IC. Sec. 27. A concealment whether intentional or unintentional entitles the injured party to rescind a contract of insurance.
Is the insured obliged to disclose everything?
No. Sec. 30 of the Code provides exceptions. According to the Code, “Neither party to a contract of insurance is bound to communicate information of the matters following, except in answers to the inquiries of another:
(a) Those which the other knows;
(b) Those which, in the exercise of ordinary care, the other ought to know, and of which the former has no reason to suppose him ignorant;
(c) Those of which the other waives communication;
(d) Those which prove or tend to prove the existence of a risk excluded by a warranty, and which are not otherwise material; and
(e) Those which relate to a risk excepted from the policy and which are not otherwise material.”
What must each party to an insurance contract communicate to the other?
Each party to a contract of insurance must communicate to the other, in good faith, all facts within his knowledge which are material to the contract, and as to which he makes no warranty, and which the other has not the means of ascertaining. (Sec. 28. IC)
May there be a waiver of the right to information?
Yes. According to Sec. 33 of the Code, “The right to information of material facts may be waived, either by the terms of the insurance or by the neglect to make inquiry as to such facts, where they are distinctly implied in other facts of which information is communicated.”
How is materiality determined?
As provided in Sec. 31 of the Code: “Materiality is to be determined not by the event, but solely by the probable and reasonable influence of the facts upon the party to whom the communication is due, in forming his estimate of the disadvantages of the proposed contract, or in making his inquiries.”
What is the test of materiality?
The test of materiality is whether the insurer would have agreed to issue the policy had it known of the facts concealed or, perhaps, impose additional terms or require higher premium.
What is the difference between concealment and misrepresentation?
Misrepresentation may be distinguished from concealment inn the sense that the former is an active form of deception whereas concealment is the passive form thereof. In misrepresentation, an oral or written assertion is made, whereas in concealment, there is a failure to disclose a material fact.
What is the a “representation”?
A representation is an oral or written statement of a material fact, made by the insured to the insurer tending to induce the latter to assume the risk. It may be either affirmative or promissory.
What is misrepresentation?
Misrepresentation is a false representation which the insured states with the knowledge that it is untrue, intended to deceive the insurer into accepting the risk.
Must a representation be literally true and accurate?
No. A representation need not be literally true and accurate. It is sufficient that it is substantially or materially true, and in case of promissory representation, it is sufficient that it is substantially complied with.
Does misrepresentation as to age entitle the insurer to rescind the contract?
No. A misrepresentation as to the age of the insured does not constitute a ground for rescission. Under Sec. 233(d) of the Code, if the age of the insured was considered in determining the premium and the benefits under the policy, and the age of insured has been misstated, the amount payable under the policy shall be such as the premium would have purchased at the correct age.
What are the two kinds of representation?
Sec. 36. A representation may be oral or written.
When may a representation be made?
Sec. 37. A representation may be made at the time of, or before, issuance of the policy.
How should representations be interpreted?
Sec. 38. The language of a representation is to be interpreted by the same rules as the language of contracts in general.
What is the effect of a representation as to the future?
Sec. 39. A representation as to the future is to be deemed a promise, unless it appears that it was merely a statement of belief or expectation.
Can a representation qualify an express provision in a contract of insurance?
No. Sec. 40 of the Code provides “A representation cannot qualify an express provision in a contract of insurance, but it may qualify an implied warranty.”
May a representation be withdrawn after the insurance contract is effected?
No. Under Sec. 41 of the Code: “A representation may be altered or withdrawn before the insurance is effected, but not afterwards.”
To what date does a representation refer to?
Sec. 42. A representation must be presumed to refer to the date on which the contract goes into effect.
What is the effect on a representation when a person insured has no personal knowledge of a fact?
Sec. 43. When a person insured has no personal knowledge of a fact, he may nevertheless repeat information which he has upon the subject, and which he believes to be true, with the explanation that he does so on the information of others; or he may submit the information, in its whole extent, to the insurer; and in neither case is he responsible for its truth, unless it proceeds from an agent of the insured, whose duty it is to give the information.
When is a representation deemed false?
Sec. 44. A representation is to be deemed false when the facts fail to correspond with its assertions or stipulations.
What is the remedy when a representation is false?
Sec. 45. If a representation is false in a material point, whether affirmative or promissory, the injured party is entitled to rescind the contract from the time when the representation becomes false.
How do we determine the materiality of a representation?
Sec. 46. The materiality of a representation is determined by the same rules as the materiality of a concealment.
***
Sec. 31. Materiality is to be determined not by the event, but solely by the probable and reasonable influence of the facts upon the party to whom the communication is due, in forming his estimate of the disadvantages of the proposed contract, or in making his inquiries.
Note from Carale: The test of materiality is whether the insurer would have agreed to issue the policy had it known of the facts concealed or, perhaps, impose additional terms or require higher premium.