Vicarious liability Flashcards
(9 cards)
vicarious liability definition
where one party is held liable for the tort of another party - strict liability
structure for vicarious liability
- tort was committed
- by an employee or someone in a relationship akin to employment
- in the course of their employment or quasi-employment
what is the test to identify an employment relationship
Ready Mixed concrete v Minister of Pensions
what to consider for the Economic Realities test
-Remuneration for personal service and mutuality of obligations
Control (more control the employer has, more likely they are an employee)
Other contractual factors:
- Tools and equipment
- PAYE
- Integration as an organization
Label is irrelevant
Where does the test for relationship akin to employment come from
Barclays Bank v Various
What is the test for a relationship akin to employment?
a) The employer is more likely to have the means to compensate the claimant than the tortfeasor
b) The tort has been committed as a result of an activity being undertaken by the tortfeasor on the employer’s behalf
c) The tortfeasor’s activity is part of the business activity of the employer
d) By allowing the tortfeasor to carry on the activity, the employer created the risk of the tort being committed
e) The tortfeasor is, to a greater or lesser degree, under the control of the employer
General rule when lending employees
Primary employer will remain vicariously liable and it will be difficult for them to rebut this (Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths)
Possible for both primary and secondary employers to be vicariously liable
Test to establish whether the tort was committed in the course of the employment or quasi-employment
- what is the nature of the employee’s job?
- was there sufficient closeness of connection between the position in which the employee was employed and the wrongful act
Mohammud v Morrisons
Employer’s indemnity
- under s 1(1) Civil Liability (Contribution Act), an employer may be entitled to seek an indemnity from their employee should they be forced to pay damages in respect of the employee’s tort.
- BUT generally not done