Vicarious Liability Flashcards
(13 cards)
The main rules for imposing liability
- there must be a tort
- the tortfeasor must be an employee and
- the tort must occur in the course of employment; and/or the tort must be closely connected with the employment
- VL
Make sure you establish the tort. This is usually very obvious. Often you are told eg that there was ‘negligent driving’.
- VL
Establishing that the tortfeasor is an employee
Barclays Bank v Various case as a part of establishing employee status
- There must be a relationship between the two persons which makes it proper for the law to make one pay for the fault of the other
- There must be a connection between the relationship and the tortfeasor’s wrongdoing
Traditional tests to establish employment status
- Control test – Mersey Docks v Coggins
- Integration test – Cox v Ministry of Justice;
- Economic reality (multiple) test – Ready Mixed Concrete
If employment status is ambiguous, which test do you use?
Akin to Employment test CBC approved in Armes v Nottingham CC
What are the different steps of the akin to employment test?
Comes from the CBC case
1. The employer has liability insurance- insured against liability
2. Employee’s doing something on behalf of the employer
3. The work is part of the employers business
- VL
The Tort must occur in the course of employment.
You need to establish whether there was an non-intentional tort and/or intentional tort
Which test is used for Non-intentional torts?
Salmond test
What are the circumstances where the tort falls within the course of employment as a part of the Salmond test?
- authorised act in an unauthorised manner – Limpus v London General Omnibus;
- authorised act in a purely careless manner – Century Insurance v Northern Ireland Transport Board
- where the employer benefits from the tort – Rose v Plenty
What are the circumstances that are not within the course of employment as a part of the Salmond test?
- unauthorised act in an unauthorised manner – Beard v London General Omnibus
- employee on a frolic on his own – Storey v Ashton
- giving unauthorised lifts – Twine v Beans Express
What is the test for Intentional torts?
The Close Connection test
Explain the Close Connection test
Close connection test is where there is a link between what the employee was employed to do and the employee’s conduct - Lister v Hesley Hall. CBC said ask two things:
1. What was the nature of their job, and
2. Was there a sufficient connection between the position they were employed to carry out and the wrongful act which makes it right for the employer to be held liable Mohamud v Morrisons