Violence Flashcards
(89 cards)
What constitutes recklessness
Acting recklessly involves a conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustifiable risk
What was held in r v tihi
In addition to one of the specific intents, it must be shown that the offender either meant to cause the specified harm, or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it
What is the age for a charge of people smugglinge
Under 18 years of age
What was held in r v crossnan
A mere threat does not constitute violent means. A combination of threats and violence does
In relation to takes away and detains which is correct
Detains and takes away are two separate and distinct offences
What was held in r v Joyce
The crown must establish that at least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.
In relation to blackmail what is an accusation.
Accusation will normally refer to an allegation that the defendant person is guilty of criminal conduct, it is immaterial whether the substance of the accusation is true or false.
What is the difference between section 188 and 189
The victims outcome and injuries
SHORT ANSWER
Doctoring of transferred malice 1st sentence only and r v hunt
It is not necessary that the person suffering the harm was the intended victim - r v hunt - offender intended to stab property owner but accidentally stabbed his servant.
SHORT ANSWER
Definition of injurious substance and device
The definition of injurious substance or device covers a range of things capable of causing harm to a person for example, a letter containing anthrax, boiling water,
SHORT ANSWER
What was held in r v skivington
Theft is an ingredient of robbery, if an honest belief that a man has a claim or right is a defence to theft, then it negatives an element of robbery, without proof of which the full offence is not made out
Three intents for kidnapping
- defendant intended to marry the person
- have sexual connection with the person
- cause them to be detained to marry another person or to have sexual connection with another person
What questions must you ask when u receive information from a CHIS in relation to a robbery
A
What circumstantial evidence can u use to prove intent
- prior threats
- evidence of premeditation
- the use of a weapon
- the number of blows
- the degree of force used
- the body parts targeted
- the degree of resistance by victim
Definition of r v waters
A wound involves the breaking of the skin followed by the flow of blood either externally or internally
Define r v kelt in relation to 198B
Both the physical and mental component must be proved to satisfy this element.
What is the statutory defence for blackmail
A belief by the person making the threat that they are entitled to the benefit or to cause the loss, is not in itself a defence unless the threat is in the circumstances, a reasonable and proper means for effecting his or her purpose
Would a charge under 198A fail if the police officer was trespassing?
If the officer was trespassing on private property without authority then they cannot be said to be acting in the lawful execution of their duty, so yes it will fail
LIABILITY FOR
234(1) violence and extorts
209(a) taking and holding (kidnapping/abduction)
A
LIABILITY
Aggravated Robbery (GBH)
235(a), (b) or (c)
14years
(a) robs any person and at the time of or immediately before or immediately after, the robbery causes GBH to any person.
(b) being together with any other person, robs any person
(c) being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument, or anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument, robs any other person
LIABILITY
Abduction for sexual connection
208(a), (b) or (c)
14 years
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for 14 years who unlawfully takes away or detains a person without his or her consent or with his or her consent obtained by fraud or duress with intent to,
(a) marry him or her
(b) have sexual connection with him or her
(c) cause him or her to be married or to have sexual connection with some other person
Ingredients for demands with intent to steal Section 239(1) 14 years
(1) Without claim of right, by force or with any treat, compels any person to execute, make, accept, endorse, alter or destroy any document capable of conferring a pecuniary advantage with intent to obtain any benefit
(2) everyone is liable to 7years who, with menaces or by any threat, demands any property from any person with intent to steal it.
Assault with intent to rob Sec 236(1)(a), (b) or (c) 14 years
Everyone is liable to 14 years who, with intent to rob any person,
(a) causes GBH to that person or any other person
(b) being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument, or anything appearing to be such a weapon or instrument, assaults that person or any other person
(c) being together with any other person or persons, assaults that person or any other person
What are the intents of blackmail
Sec 237
(a) with intent to cause the person to whom the threat is made to act in accordance with the will of the person making the threat, and
(b) to obtain any benefit or to cause loss to any other person