Voluntary Manslaughter: Diminished Responsibilty Flashcards

1
Q

Voluntary manslaughter

A

3 defences to changer murder
If once successful then it is reduced to manslaughter
Diminished responsibility- homicide act 1957
Loss of control - coroners and justice act 2000
Suicide pact - homicide act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Diminished responsibility

A

S2(1) homicide act and amended by CJA 2009
A person who kills or is a party to a killing of another is not to be convicted of murder if he was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning which:
a) arose from a recognised medical condition
b) substantially impaired the Ds ability to:
- understand the nature of his conduct
- form a rational judgment
- exercise self control
c) provides an explanation for Ds acts and omissions in doing or being a party to the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Burden of proof

A

On the d, but d only need prove it on the balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Recognised medical condition

A

Byrne 1960
Sexual psychopath strangled and mutilated a woman
Medical evidence said that the abnormality of his mind meant he was unable to control his pervert desires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Abnormality of mental functioning
Test

A

Ds mental functioning was so different from an ordinary human being, a reasonable man would term it abnormal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Substantial impairment

A

Have to prove that the abnormality substantially impaired the Ds responsibility of his actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Substantial impairment
Prove minimum of 1 in court

A

To form a rational judgement
- doesn’t know nature of his conduct
- suffers from paranoia or schizophrenia
- battered women’s syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Providing an explanation for Ds conduct

A

D has to prove that the abnormality of mental functioning provides an explanation for his acts or omissions
Has to be a causal connection between abnormality of mental functioning and the killing
Must be a significant factor in the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Golds 2014

A

D had history of a mental disorder
Killed partner by stabbing her 22 times
Mental disorder was a substantial impairment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v diestschmann

A

D killed friend who broke dead relatives watch
D medicated for suicidal thoughts relating to the relatives death
Mental disorder was enough to impair his ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly