W & M Rule Statements Flashcards
(97 cards)
Notice Requirement for a Negligence Claim against City
Every claim against any locality for negligence is barred unless the claimant files a written statement of the nature of the claim, including the time and place at which the injury is alleged to have occurred, within six months after such cause of action accrued.
Where must the written statement be filed?
Statement must be filed with the county, city, or town attorney or with the chief executive or mayor of the county, town or city.
When is notice deemed timely filed?
when it is received in the office of the official to whom the notice is directed.
Who has the burden of proof to establish receipt of notice?
Claimant.
How are the provisions of the procedural statute for notice construed?
Mandatory rules that are strictly construed.
If Notice requirements are not met….
The claimant will be barred from bringing the claim.
Does the notice requirement apply to city employees?
No - only applies to city, town, locality
What is the exception to the notice requirement?
Actual knowledge
while a written statement is the property way of providing notice, “provided that the attorney, chief executive, or mayor… or any insurer or entity providing coverage or indemnification of the claim, had actual knowledge of the claim… within six months,” the claim would still be able to proceed.
What is the cause of action for inverse condemnation?
A cause of action for inverse condemnation is a specific type of proceeding based on a constitutionally created right connected to the “taking” or “damaging” of property by the government.
Taking or damaging property means that….
the gov’t action adversely affects the landowner’s ability to exercise a right connected to the property.
To prevail on a claim for inverse condemnation, P must prove:
(i) the property owner owns private property or has some private property right,
(ii) the property or a right connected to that property has been taken or damaged by the government,
(iii) the taking or damaging was for “public use,” and,
(iv) The government or condemning authority failed to pay just compensation to the property owner
Is a drainage project considered a public use?
Yes
Based on a draining project, if an individual suffers from flooding, can that support an inverse condemnation claim?
VA Supreme Court held that a single event of flooding can support an inverse condemnation claim where the property owner’s allegations prove the flooding to their property was caused by city’s failure to maintain the waterway channel.
The abatement of a public nuisance is an exercise of the ___________ _________ of the city.
Police power
Public Nuisance
when a property owner fails to take care of their property and creates a nuisance to the public
In a public nuisance case, where the owner has proper notice and opportunities to be heard on whether their property constituted a nuisance and it is found to be a nuisance, the abatement will/will not be considered an unlawful taking.
Will not be an unlawful taking.
If there is no unlawful taking, is a property owner entitled to compensation?
No
What is a “taking”?
Under federal and VA constitutions, governments entities may:
(1) Take private property
(2) For public use
(3) With just compensation
Is there a taking where the property in question is public property?
No
A taking is not for the public use if the primary use is for private…
private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development except for the elimination of a public nuisance.
Just amount of compensation
when a lawful taking by the government has occurred, condemnation jurors shall be appointed by the Court to determine the issue of just compensation in accordance with procedures prescribed for the condemning authority
Can loss profits be recovered as part of the taking in a condemnation case?
Yes, even if the loss profits are speculative and uncertain.
Legal Nuisance
A municipality or other local government entity (except a county) may be liable for injuries resulting from the creation or maintenance of a nuisance which unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of another’s property.
Is immunity granted with respect to operation of park or recreational extended to a nuisance action based on the operation of such public spaces?
Yes