Was Damage Or Harm Foreseeable?

Question 0

D the London Ambulance Service, C an asthmatic who suffered an attack. Her doctor telephone for an ambulance that took 30 minutes to occur. C suffered a respiratory arrest. What case was this?

Answer 0

Kent v Griffiths

Question 1

1. Would a ______ person in the defendants position have ____ that the claimant might be _____?

Answer 1

Reasonable
Foreseen
Injured

Question 2

The Caparo 3 part test;

1. Was _____ or harm _____?
2. Is there _____ between the claimant and defendant?
3. Is it ____, just & ______ to impose a duty of care?

Answer 2

Damage
Foreseeable
Proximity
Fair
Reasonable

Question 3

What was held in Kent v Griffiths?

Answer 3

Reasonably foreseeable that the claimant would suffer harm from failure of ambulance to arrive. C won.