Water Column Sampling Techniques Flashcards
(16 cards)
Water Surface Techniques
Surface water samples may be collected by hand from shore or small boats or using the ship’s underway pumping system
Rarely use divers, but useful for precise depths and sediment cores
Depth profiles usually use bottles on a CTD rosette
Water bottles
Rapid exchange with surrounding water
Reliable closures
Resistant to corrosion, no contamination
Easy to handle
Bottles on a hydroline
Thin cable deployed from winch
Bottles attached at set intervals
Bottles closed using ‘messengers’
Hydroline bottles pro and cons
Simple
No knowledge of water column structure
Line unlikely to be vertical
Rosette bottles
Can be closed individually by signal from ship
Other equipment can be attached to rosette
Obtain a preview of water column
Can sample specific features
Large volumes obtained by closing more than 1 bottle
Sample processing
For analysis of chemical constituents, water samples are usually filtered.
Sources of particles:
- biology
- dust
- rivers and resuspension
Particle concs may range from g/L in turbid estuaries to a few ug/L at intermediate water depths
Filtering
0.2um filter usually used to separate dissolved phase from particulate phase
Ideal filter:
- high mechanical strength
- uniform particle cut off
- no contamination/adsorption
Sample storage
need to prevent changes in composition of dissolved phase by biota.
For macronutrients usually freeze
- cannot store samples of ammonia
Trace metals storage
Acidify to pH ~2
DOC/DON/DOP storage
Typically freeze or add mercuric chloride
In situ collection particles
In situ filtration:
- allows filtration of several 100L of seawater
- rapid deployment and recovery
- Biased to smaller particles
Sediment traps:
- better at collecting rarer larger particles
Sediment traps
Cones or tubes
Mouth size few cm to ~1m
Can be fixed (Eulerian) or drift (langrangian)
Array of collectors that can be switched at intervals to achieve time series data
Collectors usually contain a poison to preserve samples
Advantage of sediment traps
Direct flux measurements
Time series possible by rotation
Large amount of material
Allows collection of larger particles
Limitations sediment traps
Over or under sample
Swimmers and potential for microbial alteration of collected material
Expensive
Poor at collecting small particles
Advantages in situ pumps
Rapid deployment
Fine particles
Large mass
Limitations In situ pumps
Can’t time series
difficult to estimate fluxes
Large particles may be missed