Watson and Rayner - classic study Flashcards
(11 cards)
what is the aim of watson and rayner study?
- demonstrate that basic emotional responses can be classically in an infant
- to see if fear would generalise to similar stimuli
what was the sample of watson and rayner?
- opportunity sampling
- 1 participant = 11 month old boy ‘little albert’
what was the procedure of watson and rayner?
- pre-conditioning;
albert was showed various objects (white rat, masks) to which he showed no fear + his response to loud noise was tested - conditioning;
1 session per week + white rat (NS) was paired with a loud noise (UCS) from striking a steel bar and the noise made albert cry (UCR) - testing for generalisation;
Albert was shown the rat, a rabbit, dog, santa claus mask = albert showed fear responses to the other objects - testing for persistance;
tests with rat and other objects after 5 days, then after months = fear persisted but was less intense after 5 weeks
what where the findings of watson and rayner?
albert learned to fear the rat through classical conditioning
albert showed stimulus generalisation as fear spread to other stimuli
alberts fear lasted weeks showing emotional conditioning can be persistent
what are the conclusions of watson and rayner?
phobias can be learned through classical conditioning
fear can generalise to similar objects
emotions aren’t entirely innate as they can be shaped by the environment
what is the G for watson and rayner?
- low generalisability
- study used only 1 participant
- results may not generalise to a population including older people, other infants, people from other cultures
what is the R for watson and rayner?
- high reliability
- used standardised procedure = stimuli and timings consistent + controlled lab experiment
- could be replicated
what is the A for watson and rayner?
- applicable to real life
- shows that phobias can be learned through classical conditioning
- acts as a foundation for phobia treatments = systematic desensitisation + flooding
what is the V for watson and rayner?
- high internal validity
- controlled lab experiment
- ensures cause and effect = fear was due to conditioning, not chance
what is the E from watson and rayner?
- ethical issues
- psychological harm was purposefully induced to cause a fear response
- goes against BPS guidelines