A significant statement is defined as..
‘a failure or refusal to answer a question or answer satisfactorily when under caution’ (Code C 11.4A & Code H 11.5)
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994) ss 34-37 permit the court to draw ‘such inferences as appear’ proper against the accused in the circumstances contained within those sections
Section 34 - CJPOA is drawing inferences from ?
from silence when questioned or charged/officially informed that he might be prosecuted
nferences can be drawn if, when questioned by the police under caution, charged or officially informed that he may be prosecuted, the defendant fails to mention a fact on which he later relies in his defence, that he could reasonably have been expected to mention at this time.
What is CJPOA 1994 Section 36
Section 36 – inferences from silence when fail to account for objects, substances and marks
What is CJPOA 1994Section 37
Inferences from silence when fail to account for presence
What is CJPOA Section 35
Inferences from silence at trial
Under section 36 what 4 conditions must be satisfied
What 4 conditions must be ratified for section 37
A special warning must be given for which sections
36 and 37 - what are they?
What is a significant statement
Defined under Code C para 11.4A and Code H para 11.5 as ‘one which appears capable of being used in evidence against the suspect, in particular a direct admission of guilt’
What is a relevant comment
Where it falls outside the context of a ‘significant statement’ but nevertheless may still be relevant to the offence