Week 03 Flashcards
urban form
physical geography
culture
architectural style
government planning
air quality
comparing NA cities vs Europe
europe has pre automobile city design
less car dependency
different public design patterns
NA = autodependence
european cities: social space
more public space
less commercializaiton
lively downtowns
neighbourhood stability
municipal socialism
european cities: networks
mix from different eras
medievial street patterns and boulevards
best preserved cities were not targeted during wars
NA cities: networks
auto centrality
european cities: urban form
walled cities
compact due to constrained resources when designed and built
renaissance, agrculture revolution
cities expanding outwards
larger public spaces
more ornate buildings
industrial era
core of cities
polluting
wealth moved outside the city
changed hte cores of cities
deindustrialization
deindustrialization of cities in the western world
sewer systems cleaned up the city
many cities were rebuilt to look how they did before the war
potsdamer platz - berlin
rebuild the center of hte city
old rail lines rebuilt for public spaces
post-industrial european city
lots of availabke land in hte middle cores of cities where the industrial yards were
ex. western harbour, malmo
vulcan, oslo
european cities: mobility
europe has amazing transit networks
many modes of tranportation
works because of the compacted density
bordeaux
gromy port city that they turned around
no overhead electrical lines for LRTS
blends with the urban and human scale environemnt more effectively
berlin transit hub
one of the largest hubs in the world
anywhere in europe by high speed rail
amsterdam
tram adapted to the old city
cycling roundabout in the Netherlands
groningen denmark
pop 200,000 (18% students)
cycling and walkability
history of cycling
car accidents and density led to anti car calls
bycicle culture
stockholm royal seaport
strategic redevelopmpent of old industrial areas
human scale integrated district
built on smart grid
hmmarby sjostad
inner city port development
old industrial zone
ecocycle approach
transit
ecomodel cycle
energy waste, water
closed loop of energy
very efficient
are smart cities the same thing aas sustainable cities
no
malmo
connected directly to copenhagen
lots of household waste is collected
bus fleets run on bio gas
malmo western harbour
former massive port location
deindustrialization left these areas unused
hyllie
large scale smart grids
lots of social housing
factors working against transit
cities are not growing in radial patterns
increasingly decentralizing
jobs in many cities are moving out of the core
campus office complexes