week 11 Flashcards

1
Q

general intelligence tests are more predictive of performacne in what phase?

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

perceptual-speed abilities are more prediucitive of performance in phase??

A

2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

psychomotor abilities are more predictive in phase ?

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

shams et 2000

A

discovered the sound-induced flash illusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

not everyone has the same temporal binding window (TBW)

A

there are some individual variations, and individual differences in temporal binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

does variation exist in individual experiences with the sound-induced flash illusion

A

yes, but they may be too small at the neurophysiological level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what can we use to understand perceptual thresholds

A

behavioral methods
- asking people when the flash then measuring that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the temporal binding window

A
  • varies between participants
  • can be determined experimentally using psychophysics (operant conditioning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how could you determine the perceptual threshold for an individual

A

“percecing them as 2 different events”
- stair case method
- find out what the minimum present the 2 stimuli at different time until they get the time they know there is 2 stimuli
- if the person knows there is 2 stimuli, switch up the order of times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

on a psychometric curve - stimulus intensity at threshold

A
  • point at which ppl at 50%
  • able to detect stimulus (its measuring threshold of when 50% of ppl can detect the stimulus)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

signal detection theory- determing thresholds how?

A

variablitiy in detection thresholds (and binding windows) can be determined mathecmatically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

gaussian distribution

A

how variability in detection thresholds is determined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

about gaussian distribution

A

noise on one side signal+noise on the other
- need to seperate signal and noise
- can help figure out how long to detect signal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

to detect a stimulus, individuals select a crterion

A

if the perceived intentsity is greater than the criterion
if the perceived intensity is less than the criterion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

if the perceived intensity is greater than the criterion

A

stimulus is detected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

if the perceived intensity is less than the criterion

A

stimulus is undetected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

possible outcomes

A

hit
false alarm
correct rejections
miss

18
Q

hit

A

correct response

19
Q

false alarm

A

incorrect yes
- we say a signal is there but its actually just noise
- no signal

20
Q

correct rejection

A

correct no
- no presence of stimulus

21
Q

miss

A

incorrect no
- signal is presented but just noise is identified

22
Q

individual difference in sensory processing

A
  • interested in variation sensory thresholds
23
Q

what is d-prime

A

a measure of sensitivity and estimates the standardized difference between the mean of 2 distributions

24
Q

%hits

A

proportions of hits (hits/total presentations )

25
%false alarms
proportion of false alarms (flase alarms/non-presentations
26
convent proportions to Z-scores using Z-tables
d= Z (%hits)- Z (%false alarms)
27
what does calulating d- prime help with
interpretating individual difference in sensory integration
28
each individuals nervous system
use differnt criteria - can reflect a combination of individual differences in strategy and processing
29
stevenson et al, 2012
investigated if individual difference in the perception of McGurk stimulus could be related to variability in the temporal binding window of participants
30
results of stevenson 2012 - left window
- no relationship between perception McGurk effect and left temporal binding window
31
results of stevenson 2012 - right window
individual with shorter temporal binding had higher likely hood of precepting the McGurk effect
32
how did stevenson use to determine the TBW
pscyhophysics
33
what do most motor control and learning paradigms use
individual differences analyses as supplementary analyses
34
individual differences analyses as supplementary analyses
when no group differnce are found, researchers often look for individual differences
35
Lebar et al, 2015
examined participants brain response to visual stimuli during a mirror-reversed drawing tasks
36
results of lebar et al, 2015
- did not find any difference in brain response to visual stimuli in mirror-reversed vs normal drawing conditions
37
results of lebar et al, 2015 high performers
showed increased visual cortex activation during drawing when compared to low performers
38
how can we design an experiment to examine if high performers' really do show increases in brain activity
- training-studies - between-group differences
39
example of a between group studies
test art students compared to kin students meausre brain activity
40
example of training studies
pre and post measure's - measure before then send to training art school then measure after the training