WEEK 18 Flashcards
(24 cards)
the economy is a system of interconnected parts and
investment is the spark that drives its growth
aggregate demand is….., it leads to increase in production and/or price
consumption + investment + government spending and (net beteern export (x) - (m) imports)
simple keynesian model
key macroeconomic variables - GDP and national icnome are oftehn used inerchangeably
circular flow of income model - illustrates income flows between different sectors of the economy and their impact on aggerage demand
fluctuations in aggregate demand - economists believe that these fluctuations drive the business cycle
Keynesian model development and assumptions
revisits the circular flow model and focuses on the determination of national income (GDP) and the effect of aggregate demand changes
the assumption are that prices are constant in the initial model-later effect on output and prices are considered
(INJECTION)J = I+G+X
INVESTMETN GOVERMNET AND EXPORT
(withdrawal) W = S+T+M
SAVING TAX AND IMPORT
TO reachthe equilibrium the national income needs to be same AS expenditure (Y=E) and ALSO
injection = withdrawal
if there is any deviation from its equilibrium (only on short run)
(Y) national income can only be
=Cd + w (withdrawal)
EXPENDITURE CAN BE FROM
Cd (from househol who asedk to produced the product + J (injections)
THE 45 DEGREE LINE IS CALLED
KEYNESIAN CROSSING
TJE CONSOMPTUON LINE IS
Cd SHALLOWER and flatter than y beacuse it includes W and Cd doesnt
if aggergate expensiture (e) exceeds national income (y)
national income will rise to meet the increase in spending , use more factro of production
given the followign data whjat will happen to equilibrium national income? C=100 I=20 M=30 X= 25 S=18 T=28 G=26
decrease IF J =W we already in equilibrium
if W is more than J WE DECREASE IF J is better than W we increase
j=71 I,G,X
w=76 S,T,M
since w>J
more leakes from the economy than injection into, leads to fall in aggregate demand and hence decrease in national income
THE MULITPIER
K=change in national income / change in expenditure
the rise in GDP is larger than the rise in the aggregate expenditure
Example 10 billion rise in aggregate expensditure could lead to 30 billion rise in GDPPP with a multiplier of
3
marginal propensity to consumer (MPC)
DETERMINES THE SIZE OF THE multiplier with higher MPC leading to a larger multiplier
mpc(under d) = change in Cd/ change in national income
mulitplier k= 1/(1-mpc)
if a rise in nation income of 100 m causes cnsumption of domestic good and services to rise by 60 the multiplier is
mpc=change in consumption/ change in national income = 60/100= 0.6
k = 1/(1-0.6) = 2.5
aggregate supply (depends on aggerage demand up to full emplyement income)short run SRAS
-Flexibility of aggeragte supply shows how output responds to a change in aggerage demand
- various perspecitve on aggerage supplu
-extreme keynesian postion
SRAS horizontal up to Yunderf= changes in AD purely refelcrted in real output Y
SRAS vertical at Yunderf
keynesian position
at all the time business face increase in demand they will increase their output only without increasing the price until they reach a position where we exhaust all our resources and reach potential level
then any increase in AD is oing to e increased only in price
increase in the prices or inflation is only going ot happen when
we reach our potential level
when the gap between actual production and the potential production is its minimum value
mainstream position the AS is a curve and not a straigh line because
diminishing returns
chnage in everything short term but not all of them
new classicist argue that the short run AS is vertial at potentila outputl YP assumptions
continuous market clearing - all markets adjust to equilibrium continuously
rational expectations-people use all available info to predict macroeconomic variable accurately
potential level at all times
only place we see an upwards detterent is when we have an upwards trend , where there is no expectaion about increasing AD
increase their production
mainstream
we can see some inflation before we reach potential level
keynesian point
no inflation before we see potential level