Week 2 Flashcards
(85 cards)
Define EBM
“The conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of the current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”
involves:
best avaliable research evidence
clinical expertise
patient value and preferences
What are the 5 steps of EBM
- Ask a clear, answerable clinical question (PICO format)
- Acquire the best available evidence
- Appraise the evidence for quality and relevance
- Apply the evidence to clinical practice
- Assess the effectiveness and performance
What are the models of EBM attitudes
Evidence Appropriatism: Emphasizes suitability over hierarchy. Best approach.
Evidence Agendaism: Cherry-picking data to support a pre-set agenda.
Evidence Nihilism: Rejecting action unless there is definitive evidence.
How to form a scientific question?
Use the PICO Model
P- population
I - intervention
C - Comparison
O - Outcome
Understand the EBM landscape:
Types of studies!
Experimental: researches introduce interventions
Observational: No intervention, just observations
Pyramid hierarchy (From highest to lowest)
- Systematic Reviews/Meta-analyses
- Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
- Cohort studies
- Case-control studies
- Case series/reports
- Expert opinion
Explain the EBM outcome measures
Pain Scales: VAS (Visual Analog Scale), 0–10 ratings
Neck Disability Index (NDI): Assesses impact of neck pain
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Gold standard for low back pain function
SF-36: 8 health domains (physical, mental, pain, vitality, etc.)
Beck Depression Inventory: Depression severity
Well-being Index: General subjective well-being
Likert Scale: Measures attitudes/perceptions (commonly used in surveys)
Apply EBM search stratergies
Use MeSH terms (Medical Subject Headings) on PubMed, Medline, Cochrane
Reference tracking is essential to confirm claims
Combine keyword + subject heading searching
Be critical of search engine results—always verify journal, author, and context
Explain BIAS
Bias (systematic error):
Confirmation Bias: Favoring info that supports beliefs
Anchoring Bias: Relying too much on first info
Availability Heuristic: Overemphasizing recent or memorable events
Observer Bias: Researcher’s expectations affect outcomes
Selection Bias: Non-representative participant sample
Funding/Publication Bias: Favorable outcomes get published more
Explain Triangulation
Using multiple sources, methods, or observers to cross-verify data and improve validity.
Explain Reflexivity
Ongoing self-reflection by researchers on how their personal background, experiences, and biases influence their research.
Explain Push Survey
A manipulative survey designed to elicit a biased response. E.g. “DJ’s lecture was the best ever! Rank: Good, Great, Excellent.”
Explain Placebo effect
Improvement due to the belief in treatment, not the treatment itself.
Explain Nocebo Effect
Worsening symptoms due to negative expectations or belief in harm
Qualitative studies are?
Explore lived experiences, perceptions, and social meanings
Allow for context-rich understanding of behavior and beliefs
Complement quantitative research and are crucial for EBP
Differentiate between black and white literature vs grey literature
Peer-reviewed
Indexed in databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus)
Includes journals with impact factors
Considered higher scientific credibility
Grey Literature:
Not indexed/peer-reviewed
Includes policy documents, reports, conference abstracts, textbooks
Quality is variable, needs critical appraisal
Sometimes contains valuable early or alternative insights
Explain why ethics is so important
Any study involving humans or animals must go through an Ethics Review Board (ERB).
Key ethical concerns:
Informed consent
Participant anonymity
No coercion or undue harm
Fair treatment and benefit sharing
Difference between Retrospective, Prospective, and Longitudinal Studies
Retrospective: Looks back (e.g., chart reviews)
Prospective: Follows subjects forward
Longitudinal: Follows same subjects over a long time
What are the difference signs of Pseudoscience vs. Science?
SCIENCE:
- Based on empirical, testable evidence
- Transparent methods and peer review
- Willing to change based on new evidence
- Seeks to falsify and test theories
- Uses structured methodology
- Clearly defined terms
PSEUDOSCIENCE:
- Relies on anecdotal or untestable claims
- Lacks peer review, often secretive
- Resistant to change or criticism
- Confirms biases; cherry-picks supportive info
- Often vague, lacks controls or replication
- Ambiguous or exaggerated terminology
What are the various aspects of the EBM Triad?
The Evidence-Based Medicine Triad:
- Best available research evidence
- Data from peer-reviewed clinical studies, meta-analyses, etc.
- Clinical expertise
- The practitioner’s own experience, judgment, and skillset
- Patient values and preferences
- Respecting the patient’s personal choices, goals, and cultural beliefs
Name and Describe Some of the Various Causes of Cognitive Bias
Confirmation Bias: Favoring info that supports existing beliefs; ignoring contradiction.
Anchoring Bias: Over-reliance on the first piece of information received.
Availability Heuristic: Giving more weight to information that is easily recalled or more dramatic.
Bandwagon Effect: Adopting ideas because they’re popular, not necessarily valid.
Dunning-Kruger Effect: People with low ability overestimate their competence; experts underestimate theirs.
Name and Describe Some of the Various Causes of Bias in Research
Selection Bias: Sample doesn’t represent the population (e.g., recruiting only gym-goers for fitness study)
Measurement Bias: Use of faulty tools or leading questions skews data
Observer Bias: Researcher expectations influence interpretation
Publication Bias: Journals prefer to publish positive results
Funding Bias: Results influenced by who pays for the research (e.g., pharma-sponsored trials)
Reporting Bias: Selective disclosure of results
What is the Difference Between Placebo and Nocebo?
PLACEBO:
Beneficial outcome from an inert treatment due to expectation of benefit
Improves symptoms despite no active ingredient
NOCEBO
Harmful outcome from a neutral intervention due to expectation of harm
Patient feels worse because they expect to
What Does the SF-36 Measure? And the Other Measures Discussed?
SF-36
8 domains of health: pain, physical functioning, vitality, mental health, emotional/social role, general health
Gold standard for comprehensive health-related QoL
NECK DISABILITY INDEX
Disability due to neck pain
Used for both acute and chronic neck pain
OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX
Functional status in low back pain
Gold standard for LBP assessment