Week 2 - Intro Flashcards

1
Q

Mohan

A

established formal criteria for determining when expert testimony should be admitted into court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sophonow

A

problems with eyewitness evidence collected by the police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lavallée

A

established guidelines for when and how expert testimony should be used in cases involving battered women syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Levogiannis

A

children are allowed to testify in court behind screens that prevent them from seeing the accused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hubbert

A

impartiality of jurors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Oickle

A

established that police interrogation techniques, which consist of various forms of psychological coercion, are acceptable and that confessions extracted through their use can be admissible in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(1) Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation

A

Any disruption of the mother-child relationship during early childhood may have harmful and potentially irreversible long term effects, especially on the child’s ability to establish meaningful prosocial relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(1) Hirschi’s Social Control Theory

A

When a bond that individual has to society is weak/broken, they are more likely to engage in criminal behaviour

  • Attachment: don’t want to jeopardize these relationships
  • Commitment: risk losing the investments
  • Involvement: time and energy
  • Belief: you should respect the rules of society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(2) Learning theories

A

Try to explain how criminal behaviour is developed and maintained

  • Classical conditioning
  • Operant conditioning
  • Vicarious learning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(3) Personality profile

A

Existence of a criminal personality

difference in the nervous system
that will lead to difference in personality and behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(1) The role of the Superego

A

Main source of criminal behaviour relates to inadequate formation of the superego during childhood

  • Harsh superego (neurotic criminal)
  • Weak superego
  • Deviant superego
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(3) Eysenk’s Biosocial Theory of Crime

A

First testable theory of criminal behaviour proposed by a psychologist

Interaction between biological, social and individual factors – Biosocial theory of crime

There are three dimensions to personality (extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism); the first two being the most influential in the development of criminal behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(3) Kernberg’s Theory of Borderline Personality Organization

A

Criminal personality is organized along a continuum

  • Psychotic: absence of reality testing and the use of primitive defences
  • Borderline: capacity for reality testing and use of primitive defences
  • Neurotic: capacity for reality testing and use of higher-level defences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Knowledge (Hess)

A

research – legal precedent, logical thinking, and case law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Methodology (Hess)

A

nomothetic – idiographic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Epistemology (Hess)

A

uncovering hidden truths/objective – persuasion/subjective

17
Q

Criteria (Hess)

A

replication/conservative - single-case/more lenient

18
Q

Nature of the law (Hess)

A

descriptive/how people behave – prescriptive/how people should behave

19
Q

Principles (Hess)

A

alternative explanations – only one correct explanation

20
Q

Latitude (Hess)

A

limited by the court – fewer restrictions

21
Q

General acceptance test

A

Expert testimony accepted in court if the basis of the testimony is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community

22
Q

The Daubert criteria (U.S.)

A
  • The research has been peer reviewed
  • The research is testable (i.e., falsifiable through experimentation)
  • The research has a recognized rate of error
  • The research adheres to professional standards
23
Q

The Mohan criteria (Canada)

A
  • The evidence must be relevant
  • The evidence must be necessary for assisting the trier of fact
  • The evidence must not violate any other rule of exclusion
  • The testimony must be presented by a qualified expert
24
Q

Expert witnesses must be knowledgeable about the following:

A
  • The functions of expert witnesses - Information (educator) and opinion
  • The differences between their field of expertise (e.g. psychology) and the law
  • The criteria for accepting expert testimony