week 3 Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

What does ‘direct applicable’ mean in the context of EU law?

A

It automatically becomes part of national legal systems without needing to be transposed into national law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of ‘direct effect’ in EU law?

A

A rule is clear, precise, and unconditional enough to be invoked by individuals in a national court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In which case was the concept of direct effect introduced?

A

Van Gend en Loos case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Are all EU laws directly applicable?

A

Yes, but only some have direct effect that can be used without further national legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can primary EU law, such as treaties, sometimes be used with direct effect?

A

Yes, it can be both vertical and horizontal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is direct effect in secondary law, particularly directives, characterized?

A

It is more limited than that of treaty provisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What do directives in EU law bind member states to do?

A

They are binding on member states but leave the choice of form and methods to national authorities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is vertical direct effect?

A

It applies only against the state or public bodies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is horizontal direct effect?

A

It applies between private individuals and/or the court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In the Marshall case, what was the main issue?

A

A female employee claimed she was dismissed due to age and sex; the UK had not implemented the directive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the court’s ruling in the Marshall case?

A

The court allowed her to rely on the national directive because her employer was a public authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in the Faccini Dori case?

A

The court refused to let Faccini Dori invoke the directive against a private company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

According to Article 228 TFEU, who are directives binding upon?

A

They are binding only on the member states to whom they are addressed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define ‘indirect effect’ in the context of EU law.

A

National courts must interpret their own national laws as much as possible in a way that aligns with the wording and purpose of the relevant EU directive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the significance of the Von Colson case?

A

Courts are required to apply national law in a way that fulfills the goal of the directive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the term ‘principle of legal primacy’ mean?

A

EU law always takes precedence over national law whenever the two conflict.

17
Q

What was established in the Costa ENEL case?

A

No country is allowed to give national laws priority over EU law.

18
Q

What did the German court question in the Internationale Handelsgesellschaft case?

A

Whether EU law could override national constitutional rights.

19
Q

What did the Simmenthal case clarify about the application of EU law?

A

EU law must be applied in full from the moment it enters into force.

20
Q

What is the ‘so long’ formula in relation to EU law?

A

German courts could refuse to apply EU law that conflicted with rights guaranteed by the German constitution.

21
Q

What is a major national challenge to the primacy of EU law?

A

Limits of EU competences.

22
Q

What does ‘ultra vires review’ mean?

A

A national court could refuse to apply EU law if it believes the EU has acted beyond its legal authority.

23
Q

What is the protection of constitutional identity?

A

A limitation on the primacy of EU law based on national constitutional courts’ concerns about fundamental rights.

24
Q

What is the shared responsibility of national courts in relation to EU law?

A

The EU relies on national courts to apply its rules.

25
What does procedural autonomy allow member states to do?
Keep their own legal procedures.
26
What is the principle of equivalence?
Countries must treat EU rights at least as well as similar national rights.
27
What is the principle of effectiveness?
National procedures cannot make it too hard or impossible to enforce EU rights.
28
What was the main issue in the Francovich case?
Italy did not implement a directive, preventing an individual from relying on it.
29
What does the Francovich principle or doctrine of state liability state?
When a country breaches EU law, it must make it up to individuals who suffer from it.
30
What are the three conditions for state liability?
* The breached EU rule must give rights to individuals * The breach must be sufficiently serious * There must be a direct link between the breach and the harm