Week 3 Flashcards

(23 cards)

1
Q

difference between arrest and pre-trial detention

A

arrest: short term detention
pre-trial detention: long term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of detention in Netherlands

A
  • Police arrest (with/without warrant)
  • Custody (remains at station for questioning)
  • Pre-trial detention (brought before judge, declared by her)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of detention in Germany

A
  • Temporary arrest wo warrant: effected by any member of the public, used immediately for flagrancy
  • Arrest w warrant: can be used to bring any suspect to justice to face trial (must be issued on same conditions as a potential pre-trial detention)
  • Judge may immediately order pre-trial detention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of detention in England

A
  • Police arrest does not require judicial authorisation (but suspect cannot stay longer than 24h without charge)
  • If not charged: has to be liberated
  • if charged: further detention is permitted but he must be immediately brought to a judge
    –> judge then decides to grant bail or continue detention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the right to first appearance

A

right to see a judge after initial capture by the police (Art 5(3) ECHR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when can someone be arrested in England

A

police has power to effect arrests without judicial authorisation

citizen may also arrest only when it’s impractical for police to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when can someone be arrested in Netherlands

A

may be done with or without warrant depending on the flagrancy of the offence

= offence must be ‘fresh’ (close temporal and spatial connection btw arrest & the completion of offence)
–> efforts of capturing the suspect must be uninterrupted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

when can someone be arrested in Germany

A

may be done with or without warrant depending on the flagrancy of the offence

= suspect must be caught in the immediate vicinity of the offence (although police doesn’t have to maintain visual/auditory connection with victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is reasonable suspicion in Netherlands

A

“a suspect is someone against whom, on the basis of facts and circumstance, reasonable suspicion of guilt of a criminal offence arises”

= objective facts + circumstances suggesting the individual has committed an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is reasonable suspicion in England

A

“must be some reasonable, objective grounds for the suspicion, based on known facts & information”

= objective: reasonable person in possession of the same facts would also suspect
Subjective: police officer carrying out the arrest has suspicion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is reasonable suspicion in Germany

A

requires high level of suspicion for arrest, namely urgent suspicion

= based on the results of investigation, it is reasonable + highly probable that the individual is the perpretrator/accomplice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when is ‘reasonable’ determined?

A

ex ante: at the time of arrest, based on the information at the time. later inaccuracies in evidence do not make the arrest unlawful retroactively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the anticipation principle in NL

A

authority must ensure detention doesn’t exceed the expected imprisonment if convicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

First appearance/habeas corpus

A
  • soon after arrest, suspect must be brought before judge
  • In inquisitorial systems, closed hearing
  • in UK, public hearing, where the suspect is charged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Time limit of police Custody

A

ECHR (Brogan + McKay): less than 4 days & 6hours

Germany: shall be presented before judge immediately (max 1 day after arrest)

Netherlands: 1st appearance max 3 days 18h after arrest

England: max 4 days (24h max without a charge) (extension of 96h max)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rights during police custody

A

remain silent / access to lawyer / legal advice / legal aid / interpretation / translation…

A ‘letter of rights’ is a printed list of rights of the suspect upon arrival at the station

17
Q

Police bail

A

in England, the suspect can be freed if he complies with some bail requirements

18
Q

what is pre-trial detention

A

a judicial detention order given by the judge, which can be reviewed or extended and may be ended if conditions are no longer met

19
Q

Pre trial detention in NL

A
  • “serious suspicion”
  • only allowed for specific offences
  • max 104 days (and up to 2 years once trial begins)
20
Q

Pre trial detention in Germany

A
  • “strong suspicion”
  • no general limitation based on offence (unless it’s a petty offence)
  • max 6 months (extension allowed if case is exceptionally complex, investigation is of unusual scope, or other serious reason)
21
Q

Pre trial detention in England

A
  • no heightened suspicion for pre-trial detention beyond initial reasonable suspicion
  • limited to imprisonable offences
  • bail is granted by default unless specific refusal grounds apply!!!
  • summary offences: max 56 days
  • indictable offences: 182 days
22
Q

What are the ECHR grounds/approach of pre-trial detention from the Buzadji case?

A

Art 5(3): right to be brought promptly + right to release pending trial (synchronisation principle)

general principles
- reasonable suspicion of having committed a crime is necessary but not sufficient for prolonged pre-trial detention
- additional grounds must be relevant and sufficiently reasoned
- justifications must not be stereotypical/abstract and must engage with specific facts of the case
- authorities must consider less intrusive alternatives

Additional grounds
- risk of absconding
- obstruction of justice
- risk of reoffending
- disruption of public order

23
Q

How was the risk of absconding described in Buzadji

A

Nationality
Residence status
How integrated the suspect is (family, community ties…)
Character (past behavior)
Compliance with prior judicial measures
Availability of alternative measures
Assets
Employment/financial situation
Possession of travel documents
Expressed intention to flee