Week 3 - Diagnosis and Assessment Flashcards
(22 cards)
Multidimensional model
Biological influences - genes, NTs, hormones
Behavioural influences - conditioning, learning
Emotional/cognitive influences - fight/flight, implicit memory
Social influences - culture, gender
Developmental influences - prenatal, childhood, adulthood
Tripartite model of emotions
Physiology - how body reacts
Cognitive - thinking alongside emotion
Behavioural - what you do
These three do not always align
Equifinality
Several paths to one outcome
Cause vs maintenance
Cause does not explain why a problem persists.
Typically more important to know maintaining factors for treatment
Historical overview - diagnosis
Major approaches - APA’s DSM, WHO’s ICD
DSM - used by Americans, regularly used for research
ICD - used by everyone else (70% psychiatrists in daily work, 1% in US, 15% in Aus)
International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
1853 - Farr and d’Espine develop standardised death causes
1893 - International List of Causes of Death
1922 - Illnesses integrated
1948 - WHO founded and ICD-6 published with section on psychiatric disorders
Current - ICD-11 (DSM-5 overlap)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
1840 - US began classifying mental disorders
1923 (statistical manual for mental diseased for hospitals) and 1945 (Medical 203) form foundations for DSM-I
1952 - DSM-I
DSM-II and ICD-8 - joint effort
1980 - DSM-III (symptoms and thresholds, rise of medical model, insurance involved, SCIDs developed)
1994 - DSM-IV (joint effort with WHO, disorders proliferated)
2013 - DSM-5 (not huge changes, research not advanced enough on genetics and biomarkers, board didn’t trust dimensional approach
DSM evolution
106 diagnoses in DSM-1
298 diagnoses in DSM-5
Unclear whether more people being diagnosed or same amount being diagnosed in different ways
ICD vs DSM
ICD - world agenda, underfunded
DSM - American agenda, lots of money
Multiple voices in one book with agendas and biases
No independent diagnoses tests, must use clinical judgement
Classification (Nosology)
Groups of symptoms that hang together
Zone of rarity - clear boundaries between symptom groupings (not always completely clear however)
Diagnosing can be uncertain and arbitrary
Diagnosing psychological disorders
Hierarchical and categorical.
Using DSM or ICD identifies client symptoms and allows for treatment plans and information searching.
Categorical vs dimensional
Nomothetic vs idiographic
Differential diagnosis required to rule out other possibilities
Reification
Equating individual with their symptoms.
Labelling encourages reification
Why use DSM?
Pros - improved care, improved study, improved communication, helps advocation
Cons - heterogenous disorders, comorbidity, culturally limited, atheoretical, reification, stigma, lack of validity, medicalisation of normality
Basic features of psychological disorder
Clinically significant difficulties
Dysfunction in processes
Personal distress
Not culturally expected
Not the result of social deviance
A valid diagnosis
Clinical description (what it looks like)
Lab research accompanying disorder
Natural history (acute/chronic)
Family studies
Clinical assessment
Systematic evaluation (biopsychosocial)
Diagnosis - fit between symptoms and diagnostic criteria
Purpose - understanding, predicting, treatment, outcome, evaluation
Depends on - reliability, validity, standardisation
Clinical interview
Assesses - presenting problem, current/past behaviour, detailed history, attitudes, emotions
Structured or semi-structured (ADIS-5, SCID5)
Mental status exam
Appearance/behaviour, thought processes, mood, intellectual functioning, sensorium
Physical exam
Helpful to rule out aetiologies (toxicity, medication, allergic reactions, metabolic conditions)
Behavioural/functional assessment
Identify/observe target behaviours
ABCs - antecedent, behaviours, consequences
Assessment (observing) vs analysis (manipulation of A or C to see results)
Self-monitoring - simply monitoring behaviour can be enough to change it (reactivity)
Psychological assessment
Standardised tools to assess cognition, emotion, behaviour
E.g. projective tests, objective tests (intelligence, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, physiological assessment)
Case formulation
Hypotheses about cause and maintenance
Learn about antecedents to mechanisms
Understand how environment may influence treatment
Select best intervention and monitor outcomes