Week 3 - Diagnosis and Assessment Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

Multidimensional model

A

Biological influences - genes, NTs, hormones
Behavioural influences - conditioning, learning
Emotional/cognitive influences - fight/flight, implicit memory
Social influences - culture, gender
Developmental influences - prenatal, childhood, adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tripartite model of emotions

A

Physiology - how body reacts
Cognitive - thinking alongside emotion
Behavioural - what you do

These three do not always align

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Equifinality

A

Several paths to one outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cause vs maintenance

A

Cause does not explain why a problem persists.
Typically more important to know maintaining factors for treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Historical overview - diagnosis

A

Major approaches - APA’s DSM, WHO’s ICD
DSM - used by Americans, regularly used for research
ICD - used by everyone else (70% psychiatrists in daily work, 1% in US, 15% in Aus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

International Classification of Diseases (ICD)

A

1853 - Farr and d’Espine develop standardised death causes
1893 - International List of Causes of Death
1922 - Illnesses integrated
1948 - WHO founded and ICD-6 published with section on psychiatric disorders
Current - ICD-11 (DSM-5 overlap)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

A

1840 - US began classifying mental disorders
1923 (statistical manual for mental diseased for hospitals) and 1945 (Medical 203) form foundations for DSM-I
1952 - DSM-I
DSM-II and ICD-8 - joint effort
1980 - DSM-III (symptoms and thresholds, rise of medical model, insurance involved, SCIDs developed)
1994 - DSM-IV (joint effort with WHO, disorders proliferated)
2013 - DSM-5 (not huge changes, research not advanced enough on genetics and biomarkers, board didn’t trust dimensional approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DSM evolution

A

106 diagnoses in DSM-1
298 diagnoses in DSM-5
Unclear whether more people being diagnosed or same amount being diagnosed in different ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ICD vs DSM

A

ICD - world agenda, underfunded
DSM - American agenda, lots of money
Multiple voices in one book with agendas and biases
No independent diagnoses tests, must use clinical judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Classification (Nosology)

A

Groups of symptoms that hang together
Zone of rarity - clear boundaries between symptom groupings (not always completely clear however)
Diagnosing can be uncertain and arbitrary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Diagnosing psychological disorders

A

Hierarchical and categorical.
Using DSM or ICD identifies client symptoms and allows for treatment plans and information searching.
Categorical vs dimensional
Nomothetic vs idiographic
Differential diagnosis required to rule out other possibilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reification

A

Equating individual with their symptoms.
Labelling encourages reification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why use DSM?

A

Pros - improved care, improved study, improved communication, helps advocation
Cons - heterogenous disorders, comorbidity, culturally limited, atheoretical, reification, stigma, lack of validity, medicalisation of normality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Basic features of psychological disorder

A

Clinically significant difficulties
Dysfunction in processes
Personal distress
Not culturally expected
Not the result of social deviance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A valid diagnosis

A

Clinical description (what it looks like)
Lab research accompanying disorder
Natural history (acute/chronic)
Family studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Clinical assessment

A

Systematic evaluation (biopsychosocial)
Diagnosis - fit between symptoms and diagnostic criteria
Purpose - understanding, predicting, treatment, outcome, evaluation
Depends on - reliability, validity, standardisation

17
Q

Clinical interview

A

Assesses - presenting problem, current/past behaviour, detailed history, attitudes, emotions
Structured or semi-structured (ADIS-5, SCID5)

18
Q

Mental status exam

A

Appearance/behaviour, thought processes, mood, intellectual functioning, sensorium

19
Q

Physical exam

A

Helpful to rule out aetiologies (toxicity, medication, allergic reactions, metabolic conditions)

20
Q

Behavioural/functional assessment

A

Identify/observe target behaviours
ABCs - antecedent, behaviours, consequences
Assessment (observing) vs analysis (manipulation of A or C to see results)
Self-monitoring - simply monitoring behaviour can be enough to change it (reactivity)

21
Q

Psychological assessment

A

Standardised tools to assess cognition, emotion, behaviour
E.g. projective tests, objective tests (intelligence, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, physiological assessment)

22
Q

Case formulation

A

Hypotheses about cause and maintenance
Learn about antecedents to mechanisms
Understand how environment may influence treatment
Select best intervention and monitor outcomes