Week 3: Research Ethics Flashcards
(27 cards)
What is ethics?
Set of principles and practices that provide moral guidance in a particular field
What are the four moral principles of research ethics?
- Risk vs Benefits
- Acting responsibly and with integrity
- Seeking justice
- Respecting people’s right and dignity
Who is affected by psychological research and must be considered?
- Research participants
- Scientific community
- Society
What are the personal risks of psychological research?
- treatment may fail or harm
- procedure may result in harm
- right to privacy may be violated
What are the personal benefits of psychological research?
- receive helpful treatment
- learn about psychology
- money or credit for participating
How to determine if research is ethical in regards to risk and benefits?
Only ethical if risks are outweighed by benefits
What are the scientific risks of psychological research?
- Bad research taking resources from productive research
- Results misinterpreted with harmful consequences
What are the scientific benefits of psychological research?
- Advance scientific knowledge
- Contribute to the welfare of society
What is the most common risk/benefit scenario in psychological research?
Personal risk with scientific benefit
What does the moral principle of acting with responsibility and integrity entail?
- Research if thorough and competent
- Meet professional obligations
- Be truthful
What does the moral principle of seeking justice entail?
Treat participants fairly
What does the moral principle of respecting people’s rights and dignity entail?
- Respect autonomy
- Use informed consent (obtain and document)
- Respect privacy
- Maintain confidentiality (ideally anonymity)
Why is there unavoidable ethical conflict in psychological research?
- There will always be a conflict between risks and benefits
- Being completely truthful to participants can make scientifically valid studies difficult
How do you deal with unavoidable ethical conflict in a responsible and constructive way?
- thoroughly think through the issues
- minimise risks
- weigh risks against benefits
- be able to explain ethical decisions to others
- get feedback on ethical decisions
- take responsibility for ethical decisions
Nuremberg Code
- set of 10 ethical principles for research
- written in 1947 in conjection with Nuremberg trials
Declaration of Helsinki
- created by World Medical Council 1964
- required written protocol for human research participants
Belmont Report
- guidelines from 1978, developed in response to Tuskegee study
- has three principles (justice, respect for persons, beneficence)
What are the three principles of the Belmont Report?
- Justice: distribute risk and benefits fairly across groups at society level
- Respect for persons : need for informed consent
- Beneficence: maximise benefits of research while minimising harm to participants and society
What are the three types of research risk levels?
- Exempt research
- Expedited research
- Greater than minimal risk research
What is the principle of informed consent?
- obtaining and documenting people’s agreement to participate in the study
- Must inform them of everything that might be reasonably expected to affect their decision
- Do form but also oral
When is informed consent not required?
- No harm
- Conducted in the context of people’s ordinary lives
(e.g. counting how many people hold open the door in a public building)
What counts as deception in psychological research?
- misinforming participants about the purpose of a study
- using confederates
- using phony equipment
- presenting participants with false performance feedback
When does ethics allow for deception?
- befits to study outweigh risks
- participants reasonably expected to be unharmed
- research question cannot be answered without deception
- participants informed of deception asap
What is the principle of debriefing?
- Process of informing participants asap of the purpose of the study, revealing any deception and correcting any other misconceptions that may have resulted from participation
- Also return the participant to normal mood, if applicable to study