Week 4 - Civil law Flashcards
(42 cards)
Civil law is, along with common law, one of two legal traditions most studied in comparative law. What is a simplistic understanding of civil law?
A simplistic understanding of civil law is that it involves the codification of law.
This explanation is way to narrow, because civil law is more than mere codification. Codification is the culmination (eindpunt) of a certain understanding of law, which is the real hallmark of civil law.
There is more to civil law than mere codification. It argues that codification is the culmination of a certain understanding of law - a certain kind of legal mindset - which is the real hallmark (kenmerk) of civil law. What does this hallmark include?
- Systemization of law. The legal system works coherent and logical.
- Method of statutory interpretation. The role of judges is restricted. They can only operate within the boundaries of the law.
- Role of legal authorities. Legislators have a prominent role, since they draft laws.
- Application of law. Legislation is central and important and not relying on judicial decisions or reusing precedents established by judges.
- The legal system is a product of the specific historical evolution.
Civil law is often cited as statutory law. What does this mean?
Statutory law means that law is expressed in statutes and the statutes reflect the substance of law.
This infers that law is only written, giving civil law a distinctive characteristic of positivism.
Explain how civil law has a strong connection with democracy.
Democratically elected legislature defines law in a particular community.
Any attempt to derive law from sources other than the legislature must, therefore, defend itself against the charge that it ignores the will of the people and is thus deeply undemocratic.
Explain why, according to some, in a civil law system there is a lack of a mechanistic concept of statutory law.
The mechanistic concept of statutory law means that you can read a law and apply it without any interpretation, like a machine follows a manual.
In a civil law system, judges do not simply read a rule and apply it like a machine. Instead, they need to interpret and understand the purpose, structure, and context of the law.
Next to written law, in a civil law system we can also find customary law. What is customary law and what are its two components?
Customary law is unwritten law based on regular practice and this being the normative and consistent approach, and the belief that the practice is legally binding (opinio juris).
How relevant is customary law in modern civil law systems?
Its practical importance is minimal, and some scholars question whether there are any principles that can be described as customary law.
This illustrates that civil law is predominantly codified and thus written.
What are additional sources of law that influence civil law systems?
International law, EU law, and general principles of law.
What are the two key aspects of a judge’s role in civil law systems?
- Judges are not part of the legislative branch. Their task is to apply existing written law to individual cases. Judicial decisions are not considered formal sources of law, unlike in common law systems.
- Despite this, previous court decisions are crucial in practice. They often clarify or develop detailed rules by interpreting broad or vague statutory provisions. In some areas, such case law becomes the only practical guidance.
In civil law systems, there is a problem with judge-made-law. What is this problem?
Judges are bound by statutes (the underlying legal norms), not by previous judicial decisions (precedents). What is binding are not the rules established by a judge but only the norms on which they are ultimately based.
It is widely recognized that judges do not only apply law and interpret law, but in doing so also develop it. What German term can be used to describe this?
Rechtsfortbildung. It is a German term for the judicial development of law. By using this term, the problematic term ‘judge-made law’ can be avoided.
Why can we state that even in civil law countries, judicial decisions are highly important in the legal practice?
The judgments of judges do not merely decide individual cases, but also contain abstract statements about substance of legal norms which wil have an effect in the future and for all other cases.
What is a common myth about civil law systems, and what actually characterizes them?
A major myth is that civil law systems are primarily defined by their codes (e.g., French Civil Code 1806, German BGB 1896). In reality, what characterizes modern civil law is the underlying principle of systematizing law and basing all legal decisions on statutes. The key is not just having codes, but the desire to codify—to organize laws systematically into clear, comprehensive statutes.
What is a legal code?
A legal code is a systematic, comprehensive, and unified collection of laws with claims to exclusive authority.
What is the primary aim of a legal code?
To collect all applicable laws in a specific area into a single instrument, while eliminating duplications, inconsistencies, and contradictions.
What is the difference between a code and a statute?
A statute is an individual law.
A code is a collection of laws in a specific area in a single instrument. It basically is a large statute, not a different kind of law.
What is the true distinguishing characteristic of civil law systems?
It is not just the existence of codes, but the underlying idea of systematization and conceptualization of law.
What is one major benefit of systematizing law in civil law systems?
Consistent terminology is used so that the same terms have the same meaning within a law, across areas of law, and ideally throughout the entire legal system.
What are the two main approaches to statutory interpretation in the German legal system?
The subjective approach focuses on the legislature’s original intent, while the objective approach focuses on the intent of the statute itself. Though the subjective view may seem logical, the objective approach helps ensure that statutes stay relevant over time.
What are key objections to the subjective approach in statutory interpretation?
- The legislature is not a single thinking entity—only individuals have intent. It can better be seen as the intent of certain individual parliamentarians.
- Law should reflect the text of the statute, not the unclear intentions behind it.
- Citizens must be able to rely on the written law, not hidden motives or statements.
- Law must apply to unforeseen cases, meaning it must sometimes go beyond the legislature’s original intent.
What is the prevailing view in the debate between subjective and objective statutory interpretation?
There is no definitive resolution. A pragmatic approach now dominates: legislative intent is considered important, but not the only factor in interpreting statutes.
What are the four main methodologies of statutory interpretation in German law?
- Grammatical – based on the ordinary meaning of the words in the statute.
- Systematic – interprets the provision in relation to other legal provisions.
- Teleological – aims to fulfill the purpose or goal behind the provision.
- Historical – considers the origin of the law and its broader intellectual and legislative context.
How is the French approach to statutory interpretation similar to the German approach?
In both systems, the statute is the starting point of legal reasoning, and judges are bound by it.
How do the French approach statutory interpretation?
The focus in France critique of the early dominance of the exegetical school, where the text of the statute was given a central place in the interpretation.
Later, this method of interpretation was supplemented by a subjective variant, which used various means to determine the historical ratio legis.