Week 4 - Ethics Flashcards
(44 cards)
Tri council policy statement
framework for ethical research involving human participants
in canada
3 federal agencies
Canadian institues of health research
o Natural sciences and engineering research council of canada
o Social sciences and humanities research council of canada
core ethical principles
- Respect for persons
o Acknowledge intrinsic value and autonomy of individuals
o Emphasize importance of informed consent and protecting vulnerable
populations - Concern for human welfare
o Overall quality of life
o Consider health, housing, employment, community involvement - Justice
o Fairness and equity in research
o Benefits and burdens of research are distributed justly
Dissemination
openly share results unless it risks participant safety, provide
feedback when possible, acknowledge limitations, avoid data distortion
Indigenous research
Researchers and indigenous partners must navigate individual vs collective interests
importance of elders, knowledge keepers, indigenous governance structures
exploitative research practices have led to apprehension in indigenous
communities
OCAP principles
ownership, control, access, possession – guides ethical research
practices, highlight need for reflection on academic freedom, engagement with future
generations, spiritual values
Open mindset
Enter research without preconceived notions, avoid expecting pariticpants to confirm your assumptions
Questioning technique
Favour “how” questions over “why” questions – encourage contextual
discussions
Acknowledge constraints
Be aware of factors that may limit a participants autonomy, such as fear of
authority or lack of understanding, recognize social and personal contexts that may influence wilingness to share
Contextual approaches
Adapt research methods to a specific community and culture, show respect for participants values and norms
Descriptive rather than remedial
Avoid a fix it mentality, focus on observing and understanding
Authentic relationships
o Treat participants as partners rather than subjects
o Build genuine relationships to help dispel bias
Gaining access to the field
- Community leaders as gatekeepers – getting permission to study the group
o Honestly state research intenti9ons
- Corporate research complexity
o Gaining access to corporations may involve navigating legal departments,
companies may dictate terminology and research focus
Spending time in the field
Researcher presence – demeanor and visibility can vary, be aware of how presence impacts the community
Building relationships – familiarity with community can foster openness
ethical considerations in the field
Friendships – genuine friendships can complicate ethical responsibilities
Intimate relationships – complex ethical challenges
Leaving the field
Done respectfully, maintain integrity of relationships, consider informing
participants of findings to show appreciation
Transition to a frienship role
Covert field research
Observing without revealing ones identity
Justified when it aims to protect individuals or groups from harm
expose injustices or
improve conditions
by police, governments, is opposed as it is seen as an intrusion
truly anonymous
Interviewing and transcribing
Participants may want to be anonymous, so they don’t want to sign forms
- Verbal consent
o Explains the same details as written consent, does not require a signature
Presentism
researchers must avoid judging historical documents by modern standards
Collaborative analysis
can be used to help mitigate viewpoints
Analyzing data
Remain true to the data, do not force it to fit into preconceived theories
Acting ethically in the digital age
Accessibility – information on publicly accessible web pages may be treated like printed
materials in magazines
- Anonymity and informed consent – social media challenges traditional commitments to
anonymity, need for informed consent is questioned
Ethical reflection in writing
Avoid jargon, use the active voice, neutral tone, allow reader interpretation, avoid influencing readers opinions, be consistent
Two dimensions of ethics
- Procedural ethics – formal ethical guidelines, typically established through research
ethics board - Ethics in practice – day to day ethical decisions that arise as researchers engage in the
field