Week 4 - Ethics Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

Tri council policy statement

A

framework for ethical research involving human participants
in canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 federal agencies

A

Canadian institues of health research
o Natural sciences and engineering research council of canada
o Social sciences and humanities research council of canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

core ethical principles

A
  • Respect for persons
    o Acknowledge intrinsic value and autonomy of individuals
    o Emphasize importance of informed consent and protecting vulnerable
    populations
  • Concern for human welfare
    o Overall quality of life
    o Consider health, housing, employment, community involvement
  • Justice
    o Fairness and equity in research
    o Benefits and burdens of research are distributed justly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dissemination

A

openly share results unless it risks participant safety, provide
feedback when possible, acknowledge limitations, avoid data distortion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Indigenous research

A

Researchers and indigenous partners must navigate individual vs collective interests

importance of elders, knowledge keepers, indigenous governance structures

exploitative research practices have led to apprehension in indigenous
communities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

OCAP principles

A

ownership, control, access, possession – guides ethical research
practices, highlight need for reflection on academic freedom, engagement with future
generations, spiritual values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Open mindset

A

Enter research without preconceived notions, avoid expecting pariticpants to confirm your assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Questioning technique

A

Favour “how” questions over “why” questions – encourage contextual
discussions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Acknowledge constraints

A

Be aware of factors that may limit a participants autonomy, such as fear of
authority or lack of understanding, recognize social and personal contexts that may influence wilingness to share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contextual approaches

A

Adapt research methods to a specific community and culture, show respect for participants values and norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Descriptive rather than remedial

A

Avoid a fix it mentality, focus on observing and understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Authentic relationships

A

o Treat participants as partners rather than subjects
o Build genuine relationships to help dispel bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gaining access to the field

A
  • Community leaders as gatekeepers – getting permission to study the group

o Honestly state research intenti9ons
- Corporate research complexity
o Gaining access to corporations may involve navigating legal departments,
companies may dictate terminology and research focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Spending time in the field

A

Researcher presence – demeanor and visibility can vary, be aware of how presence impacts the community

Building relationships – familiarity with community can foster openness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ethical considerations in the field

A

Friendships – genuine friendships can complicate ethical responsibilities

Intimate relationships – complex ethical challenges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Leaving the field

A

Done respectfully, maintain integrity of relationships, consider informing
participants of findings to show appreciation

Transition to a frienship role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Covert field research

A

Observing without revealing ones identity

Justified when it aims to protect individuals or groups from harm

expose injustices or
improve conditions

by police, governments, is opposed as it is seen as an intrusion

truly anonymous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Interviewing and transcribing

A

Participants may want to be anonymous, so they don’t want to sign forms
- Verbal consent
o Explains the same details as written consent, does not require a signature

19
Q

Presentism

A

researchers must avoid judging historical documents by modern standards

20
Q

Collaborative analysis

A

can be used to help mitigate viewpoints

21
Q

Analyzing data

A

Remain true to the data, do not force it to fit into preconceived theories

22
Q

Acting ethically in the digital age

A

Accessibility – information on publicly accessible web pages may be treated like printed
materials in magazines

  • Anonymity and informed consent – social media challenges traditional commitments to
    anonymity, need for informed consent is questioned
23
Q

Ethical reflection in writing

A

Avoid jargon, use the active voice, neutral tone, allow reader interpretation, avoid influencing readers opinions, be consistent

24
Q

Two dimensions of ethics

A
  • Procedural ethics – formal ethical guidelines, typically established through research
    ethics board
  • Ethics in practice – day to day ethical decisions that arise as researchers engage in the
    field
25
Reflexivity as an ethical tool
Reflexivity – researchers relfecting on their actions, decisions, and impact throughout the research process - Allows researchers to examine their own role, biases, and ethical considerations in conducting research - supplements limitations of procedural ethics
26
procedural ethics
seen as a formality ethics committee may be unfamiliar or antagonistic toward qualitative methods ethical committees cannot see all unexpected ethical challenges. Researchers may gloss over potential risks
27
ethics in practice
unanticipated situations arise, demanding quick and thoughtful responses react to sensitive disclosures or participant vulnerabilities o breaching confidentiality to avoid harm
28
microethics
address issue between high level bioethical debates and everyday issues faced in clinical practice ethical complexities in everyday interactions relationship and interactions between researchers and participants, for respondng to sensitive disclosures
29
frustration with procedural ethics
biomedical models may not fit research needs, ethics applications are formal and bureaucratic
30
history of procedural ethics
after WWII with the Nuremberg code, created to protect research participants after atrocities committed by Nazi doctors
31
value of procedural ethics
protects basic rights and safety of participants provides a checklist for researchers, prompting them to consider issues like confidentiality, consent, risks, benefits
32
limitations of procedural ethics
not much guidance in dealing with real life situations faced in qualitative research
33
knowledge construction
research is a collaboration between researchers and participants o process requires scrutiny, reflection, and interrogation of how data is gathered
34
defining reflexivity
continuously examine their actions, roles, and research process with the same critical scrutiny as the data itself o actively construct interpretations and critically question how those interpretations come about
35
two-step process
process: first, objectively observing the research subject, and second, reflecting on that observation itself
36
RESEARCH ETHICS
principles - guide interactions w/ research participants & our commitment to safeguard their rights & interests
37
The Most Basic Ethical Dilemma
* Balancing 2 important & sometimes conflicting responsibilities
38
confidentiality
do not disclose information that identifies any one participant to anyone else
38
Protecting confidentiality
informed consent, confidentiality forms, electronic or handwritten codes, assign pseudonyms
38
Primary obligation
do no harm
39
anonymity
protecting identity of participants individuals cannot be identified
40
individual conflict of interest
interests of researcher dont coincide with interests of participants
41
institutional conflict of interest
interests of institution conflict with ethical obligations
42
all ethical research requires...
systematic data gathering transparency and accuracy collection of original data fair and accurate data representation