Week 4 - Realism II Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

Herz 1951: The Security Dilemma

A

Structural situation - states improve their own security relative to others by accumulating power resources
Other states are unsure if these are defensive or offensive actions and are forced to secure themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Neorealism

A

Theory developed from Waltz - Theory of International Politics, criticized the traditional realist focus on human nature
→ highlights that the fundamental structure of the international system guides state behaviour
The centre goal of states is survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mearsheimer on The Tragedy of Great Power Politics

A

States always try to maximize their security against rivals but only the hegemonic position gets this security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

RLE: Waltz on Iran’s Nuclear Position

A

Iran possess nuclear weapons for their own security, not to improve offensive capabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

RLE: Mearshimer on the Ukraine Crisis

A

Believes that the West is at fault since they could not accept the need for security by Russia, he found it unsurprising that Russia went to war in 2022

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criticisms of Neorealism

A

The security dilemma neglects the crucial factor of perception (Booth and Wheeler, 2008)

Failure to anticipate the end of the Cold War with the fall of the USSR

Worldview originates in and perpetuates Western History experiences

Ignores developments within states and ideological shifts

The assumption of rationality is too simplistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Multipolar vs bipolar world stability

A

Multipolar:
Flexibility of arrangement (one country can change their main ally)

Dangers are diffused, responsibilities are unclear and vital interests are obscured

Miscalculation (worst case scenario)

Bipolar:
A loss of one is a gain for the other

Take RLE - the Cold War - the US and USSR controlled each others actions throughout the war (communists in Greece = Truman Doctrine, tightening Soviet Control = the Marshall Plan then Cominform)

Overreaction is the lesser of evils

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

RLE - NATO

A

Manifestation of the bipolar distribution of power in Europe during the Cold War (American tool to manage the USSR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Liberal Institutionalism (Mearshimer)

A

Theory is based on the idea that cheating is the main inhibitor of international cooperation (prisoner’s dilemma)
Develops rules for international institutions: increase amount of transactions (states must protect their reputation) issue linkage = greater interdependence, reducing transaction costs
However, this theory only focuses on cooperation and ignores relative gains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

RLE - Martin on the EC

A

Lisa Martin argues that there were reduced transaction costs between the EC during the Falkland Wars, allowing Britain to succeed
Mearsheimer - little was at stake during these transactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Collective Security (Meashimer)

A

Wilsonian approach that challenges realist views on the state
Critique - no explanation on how to achieve trust, historical enmity, transforms local conflicts into international

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Critical Theory

A

Genuine peace system, doesn’t develop the ideal state just challenges assumptions made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly