Week 6: constituency syntax Flashcards

1
Q

Roughly describe what syntax is

A

Building sentences out of “smaller things”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What term to typologists prefer to syntax?

A

morphosyntax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name two things that are finite in linguistics

A

Number of words (at any given moment)
Number of word forms of a word type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name something that is infinite in linguistics

A

Number of word combinations
Therefore we need algorithms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What questions do syntax ask

A
  1. Is this a valid (grammatical) sentence?
  2. How can I encode meaning in a sentence?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a constituent?

A

The surface representation of a parse-tree subtree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give two types of parsing rules

A
  1. Prohibiting some word types from tightly combining
  2. Defining the order some word types combine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Name universally recognised constituent types

A

Noun Phrase (NP)
Prepositional Phrase (PP)
Verb Phrase (VP)
(Determiner Phrase (DP))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define NP

A

Nominal/noun phrase
A group pf words clustered around something that looks and behaves like a noun.
Can be replaced by a pronoun (it remains an NP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define PP

A

Prepositional Phrase
Formed by combining an NP with a preposition
Cannot be replaced by a pronoun but sometimes can be replaced by an adverb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What about PPs leads to multiple readings?

A

Their freedom of attachment to other parts of the sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define DPs

A

(Theory dependent) Determiner Phrase
An NP where the determiner is the more important part of the phrase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define VP

A

Verb phrase
Verb and all its arguments, separate from subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What (binary branching thing) is done when parsing programming languages?

A

Chomsky normal form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types of constituency tests (four)

A
  1. Adding things
  2. Moving things
  3. Removing things
  4. Replacing things
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Types of substitution tests

A

NP can be replaced by pronoun
PP can be replaced by adverb
VP can be replaced by “do so” substitution

17
Q

Intrusion test

A

If you can add an adverb, it ends up between two constituents. (Use “definitely”)

18
Q

Coordination test

A

Constituents of the same type should be able to be combined using “and”

19
Q

Right-node test

A

If something is shared by two coordinated constituents, that thing must be a constituent itself

20
Q

Topicalisation and (pseudo-)clefting

A

Ways of moving things to the ‘left periphery’. If something can be moved, it is a constituent.

21
Q

Topicalisation, clefting or pseudo-clefting?
“I know her, and polar bears she definitely hunts”

A

Topicalisation

22
Q

Topicalisation, clefting or pseudo-clefting?
“It is polar bears that she hunts.”

23
Q

Topicalisation, clefting or pseudo-clefting?
“What she hunts is polar bears”

A

Pseudo-clefting

24
Q

Wh-fronting

A

Constituents can be replaced by a question word

25
Pros of constituency syntax
Intuitive Backed up by lots of research Provides good descriptions Can be implemented consistently
26
Cons of constituency syntax
Theory dependent Constituency tests are language dependent Constituents are assumed to be contiguous
27