Which political party responded most effectively to innovations in political communications and why? Flashcards
(159 cards)
Change-over to sound-film in Britain
1930-2
By 1932 all newsreels also available w soundtracks
Rowson 1934 survey of the cinema-industry
4305 registered cinemas in England, Scotland, Wales
Average weekly admissions = 18.5 million
British population 1934
45.09 million
1939 cinema audience
weekly average ranging from 20-23 mill
Areas of highest cinema concentration
Industrial areas of Scotland, Lancashire, North of England, South Wales, Yorkshire, Midlands
43% cinema admissions for seats of 6d or less
Social Survey of Merseyside
Confirmed manual working-class went to the cinema more frequently than those immediately above them
1938-9 daily newspaper circulation
10.48 million
Number of radio licenses 1938-9
8.95 mill
Newsreel companies
Gaumont-British Movietone Pathe Paramount Universal
each produced two newreels a week
CT Cummins, editor of paramount
nothing must be included which the average man will not like
Newsreel censorship?
Not technically subject, but not a right taken for granted. Editors of diff companies met to discuss policy regarding touchy subjects
Newsreels and political criticism
Newsreel companies went out of their way to avoid giving any aids to critical viewings. Stories constructed to move as fast as poss
The press and the party system between the wars-C. Seymour-Ure, 1975, in Gillian Peele, Chris Cook, The Politics
Of reappraisal, 1918-1939 ArticleFurther
Diff between old journalism and the new. The one = highly political and linked financially to the party system; the other = broader in range and based in the market economy
dislocation of the press and the party system
Overall trend = towards a set of dominant national newspapers, squeezing out the provincials; whereas before the war the nationals were more accurately described as ‘metropolitan’ and the provincials flourished
Growth of newspaper chains
decline of metropolitan evening press
decreasing party competition in the provincial press
less scope for expression of regional particularisms
Less opportunity for the reflection of nuances of debate inside the parties about policy and personalities
Labour party growth unaccompanied by corresponding devel of Labour rpess
The press and the party system between the wars-C. Seymour-Ure, 1975, in Gillian Peele, Chris Cook, The Politics
Of reappraisal, 1918-1939 ArticleFurther
Diff between old journalism and the new. The one = highly political and linked financially to the party system; the other = broader in range and based in the market economy
dislocation of the press and the party system
Overall trend = towards a set of dominant national newspapers, squeezing out the provincials; whereas before the war the nationals were more accurately described as ‘metropolitan’ and the provincials flourished
Growth of newspaper chains
decline of metropolitan evening press
decreasing party competition in the provincial press
less scope for expression of regional particularisms
Less opportunity for the reflection of nuances of debate inside the parties about policy and personalities
Labour party growth unaccompanied by corresponding devel of Labour press
By 1939 party leaders had lost control over the finances of the press
Papers decreasing and circulations soaring
New breed of owners and managers had partisan opinions but were not party men
Economic pressures all worked towards concentration of ownership and a reduction in the number of newspapers.
At the same time they confirmed the depoliticisation that had started with the original attempt to attract a new readership
Politics became subordinate
The newspaper developed a broad social function, as distinct from a narrowly political one
Now, newspapers’ political loyalties rested only on sentiment.
Newspaper proprietors untrammelled by party machinery
With Beaverbrook and Rothermere the dislocation of the press and party system came close to the actual displacement of party by newspaper
Decline in provincial mornings
43 in 1919
25 in 1939
growth of national papers
Circulation nearly doubled in 20 yrs
facilitated by growth of Manchester as a centre for printing northern editions, pioneered by Northcliffe w Daily Mail in 1900
Lack of national paper domination
Northeast, well under half families taking a national newspaper in 1935
Decline of the Liberal press
Before the war, 3 London morning papers vs 7 Conservative papers; 2 evening papers vs 4
By 1930, Conservatives 6 morning and 2 evening papers; Liberals 1 of each
1920s parties continuing to subsidise papers
Lloyd George Daily Chronicle ownership
Morning Post purchase by Conservative syndicate incl Duke of Northumberland in 1924
1930s decline of parties’ subsidisation of papers
Morning post no new supporters when tottered again in 1937
National Labour efforts to counter Labour hostility 1931 on
fortnightly News-Letter
1932 weekly - Everyman
The Economist, halfway through the interwar period
With a few notable exceptions, the British Press consists no longer of “organs of opinion”
introduction of tabloid journalism
1935, Daily Mirror
Rothermere and Beverbrook independent political action
anti-waste campaign
Empire Free Trade movement, 1930. Threatened Baldwin’s position as Conservative leader
populist political style - seen as a threat by establishment.
Short articles and pungent prose, favouring assertion more than argument, with no room for elaborate syntax of exposition and qualification